From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Yuho Choi" <dbgh9129@gmail.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] drm/kmb: Fix device reference leaks in probe
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2026 21:28:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260608212813.78B141F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260608211341.123939-1-dbgh9129@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 6 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [Low] Undeclared identifier `dev` in `kmb_dsi_init()` breaks the build.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Devres-managed resources are bound to the wrong device, causing memory leaks on probe deferrals.
- [High] The MIPI DSI host remains registered indefinitely if the DRM probe defers, leading to a Use-After-Free upon module unload.
- [High] Calling `drm_crtc_cleanup()` on an uninitialized CRTC causes a NULL pointer dereference and kernel panic.
- [High] Ignored return value from `kmb_dsi_encoder_init()` leads to incomplete DRM initialization and crashes.
- [High] Ignored return value from `kmb_initialize_clocks()` leads to hardware operations without enabled clocks.
--
commit fe279368e5a0418668dc2dae4e274724b0887c0b
Author: Yuho Choi <dbgh9129@gmail.com>
drm/kmb: Fix device reference leaks in probe
kmb_probe() takes a reference to its own platform device only to keep a
local dev pointer, and passes an extra reference to the DSI platform
device into kmb_dsi_host_bridge_init(). Neither reference is released.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/kmb/kmb_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/kmb/kmb_drv.c
> index 7c2eb1152fc2f..f8ef618e3a810 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/kmb/kmb_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/kmb/kmb_drv.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -515,20 +515,24 @@ static int kmb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> of_node_put(dsi_in);
> of_node_put(dsi_node);
> - ret = kmb_dsi_host_bridge_init(get_device(&dsi_pdev->dev));
> + ret = kmb_dsi_host_bridge_init(&dsi_pdev->dev);
>
> - if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
> - return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> - } else if (ret) {
> - DRM_ERROR("probe failed to initialize DSI host bridge\n");
> - return ret;
> + if (ret) {
> + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER) {
> + DRM_ERROR("probe failed to initialize DSI host bridge\n");
> + kmb_dsi_host_unregister(NULL);
> + }
> + goto err_put_dsi_pdev;
> }
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but if kmb_probe() returns
-EPROBE_DEFER, it explicitly skips calling kmb_dsi_host_unregister(NULL).
If the module is subsequently unloaded while still in this deferred state,
could this cause a use-after-free since the globally allocated dsi_host
would remain registered in the MIPI DSI core's internal list pointing to
unloaded memory?
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/kmb/kmb_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/kmb/kmb_dsi.c
> index 59d0e856392fc..a7df845088842 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/kmb/kmb_dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/kmb/kmb_dsi.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1410,7 +1430,6 @@ int kmb_dsi_mode_set(struct kmb_dsi *kmb_dsi, struct drm_display_mode *mode,
> struct kmb_dsi *kmb_dsi_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct kmb_dsi *kmb_dsi;
> - struct device *dev = get_device(&pdev->dev);
>
> kmb_dsi = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*kmb_dsi), GFP_KERNEL);
[Severity: Low]
Does the removal of the dev variable declaration cause a build failure?
It looks like dev is still being used here in devm_kzalloc() without
being declared in kmb_dsi_init().
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but is the memory allocation tied to the
wrong platform device?
The devm_kzalloc() call resolves dev to dsi_pdev->dev, which is the device
returned by of_find_device_by_node(), rather than the device actively
being probed.
Since dsi_pdev isn't cleaned up when kmb_probe() returns -EPROBE_DEFER,
won't this leak a new kmb_dsi structure into dsi_pdev's devres list on
every probe deferral?
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does the error path in kmb_probe()
cause a NULL pointer dereference?
If kmb_setup_mode_config() fails before kmb->crtc is initialized,
the error path unconditionally jumps here:
drivers/gpu/drm/kmb/kmb_drv.c:kmb_probe() {
...
err_free:
drm_crtc_cleanup(&kmb->crtc);
...
}
Since devm_drm_dev_alloc() zeroes the memory, kmb->crtc.dev is NULL.
Calling drm_crtc_cleanup() on this uninitialized CRTC would dereference
this NULL pointer.
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but are we ignoring the return value
from kmb_dsi_encoder_init() here?
drivers/gpu/drm/kmb/kmb_drv.c:kmb_setup_mode_config() {
...
ret = kmb_dsi_encoder_init(drm, kmb->kmb_dsi);
/* Set the CRTC's port so that the encoder component can find it */
kmb->crtc.port = of_graph_get_port_by_id(drm->dev->of_node, 0);
ret = drm_vblank_init(drm, drm->mode_config.num_crtc);
...
}
The result in ret is immediately overwritten by drm_vblank_init().
If encoder initialization fails, the driver proceeds to register the DRM
device with an incomplete display pipeline, which could lead to crashes
during subsequent modeset operations.
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but is it safe to ignore the error code
returned from kmb_initialize_clocks()?
drivers/gpu/drm/kmb/kmb_drv.c:kmb_hw_init() {
...
/* Enable display clocks */
kmb_initialize_clocks(kmb, &pdev->dev);
/* Allocate LCD interrupt resources */
irq_lcd = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
...
}
If clock initialization fails, the driver silently continues execution
and attempts to access hardware MMIO registers. Accessing unclocked
MMIO registers usually triggers a synchronous external abort and hangs
the system.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260608211341.123939-1-dbgh9129@gmail.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-08 21:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-08 21:13 [PATCH v1] drm/kmb: Fix device reference leaks in probe Yuho Choi
2026-06-08 21:28 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260608212813.78B141F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dbgh9129@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox