From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Kaitao Cheng" <kaitao.cheng@linux.dev>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/14] drm/ttm: Open-code reservation list walk
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2026 06:51:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260609065120.74E531F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260609062526.94907-4-kaitao.cheng@linux.dev>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Missing lock release when `dma_resv_reserve_fences()` fails, leaving the current buffer object permanently locked.
--
commit 4a941c2e22e18c4c60dbeb3162fc85117e45e7a8
Author: Kaitao Cheng <chengkaitao@kylinos.cn>
drm/ttm: Open-code reservation list walk
This patch modifies ttm_eu_reserve_buffers() to open-code the
list_for_each_entry() loop. This prepares the code for future list iterator
updates while preserving the existing traversal semantics where the cursor
can be rewound during duplicate handling.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_execbuf_util.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_execbuf_util.c
> index bc7a83a9fe443..8072f07d55579 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_execbuf_util.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_execbuf_util.c
> @@ -86,7 +86,9 @@ int ttm_eu_reserve_buffers(struct ww_acquire_ctx *ticket,
> if (ticket)
> ww_acquire_init(ticket, &reservation_ww_class);
>
> - list_for_each_entry(entry, list, head) {
> + for (entry = list_first_entry(list, typeof(*entry), head);
> + !list_entry_is_head(entry, list, head);
> + entry = list_next_entry(entry, head)) {
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does the error path in this loop leak
the lock on entry->bo when dma_resv_reserve_fences() fails?
If ttm_bo_reserve() successfully acquires the lock on the current entry->bo,
and then dma_resv_reserve_fences() fails (for example, returning -ENOMEM),
the code cleans up using ttm_eu_backoff_reservation_reverse():
ttm_eu_reserve_buffers() {
...
if (!ret) {
ret = dma_resv_reserve_fences(bo->base.resv, num_fences);
if (!ret)
continue;
}
/* uh oh, we lost out, drop every reservation and try... */
ttm_eu_backoff_reservation_reverse(list, entry);
...
}
However, ttm_eu_backoff_reservation_reverse() explicitly skips unlocking the
current entry itself because it uses list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse().
The code then bypasses the slowpath because ret is -ENOMEM (not -EDEADLK)
and returns without unlocking entry->bo:
ttm_eu_reserve_buffers() {
...
if (ret == -EDEADLK) {
ret = ttm_bo_reserve_slowpath(bo, intr, ticket);
}
...
if (unlikely(ret != 0)) {
if (ticket) {
ww_acquire_done(ticket);
ww_acquire_fini(ticket);
}
return ret;
}
...
}
Could this sequence leave the ww_mutex for entry->bo permanently locked?
> struct ttm_buffer_object *bo = entry->bo;
> unsigned int num_fences;
>
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260609064122.95825-1-kaitao.cheng@linux.dev?part=6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-09 6:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-09 6:13 [PATCH v2 00/14] list: Prepare entry iterators to cache cursor state Kaitao Cheng
2026-06-09 6:13 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] drbd: Open-code transfer log list walk Kaitao Cheng
2026-06-09 6:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 6:13 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] firewire: core: Open-code topology " Kaitao Cheng
2026-06-09 6:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 6:25 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] drm/bridge: Open-code bridge chain list walks Kaitao Cheng
2026-06-09 6:25 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] drm/i915/gt: Open-code active timeline walk Kaitao Cheng
2026-06-09 7:00 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-06-09 6:25 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] drm/i915: Open-code DFS dependency list walk Kaitao Cheng
2026-06-09 6:25 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] drm/ttm: Open-code reservation " Kaitao Cheng
2026-06-09 6:51 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-09 6:25 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] spi: fsi: Open-code message transfer walk Kaitao Cheng
2026-06-09 7:02 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-06-09 6:25 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] spi: stm32-ospi: " Kaitao Cheng
2026-06-09 6:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 6:25 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] spi: stm32-qspi: " Kaitao Cheng
2026-06-09 6:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 6:38 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] spi: tegra210-quad: " Kaitao Cheng
2026-06-09 6:38 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] locking/locktorture: Open-code ww mutex list walk Kaitao Cheng
2026-06-09 6:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 6:38 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] locking/ww_mutex: Open-code stress reorder " Kaitao Cheng
2026-06-09 6:57 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] spi: tegra210-quad: Open-code message transfer walk sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 6:41 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] ASoC: dapm: Open-code widget invalidation walk Kaitao Cheng
2026-06-09 6:41 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] list: Cache cursors in entry iterators Kaitao Cheng
2026-06-09 6:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 6:55 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] ASoC: dapm: Open-code widget invalidation walk sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 6:47 ` [PATCH v2 00/14] list: Prepare entry iterators to cache cursor state Andy Shevchenko
2026-06-09 7:05 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-06-09 10:33 ` Christian König
2026-06-10 6:14 ` Kaitao Cheng
2026-06-10 8:07 ` Christian König
2026-06-10 8:18 ` Kaitao Cheng
2026-06-10 9:11 ` Christian König
2026-06-10 15:02 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-06-11 8:01 ` Christian König
2026-06-11 8:29 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-06-11 8:39 ` Christian König
2026-06-11 18:31 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-06-11 12:27 ` Kaitao Cheng
2026-06-10 14:43 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-06-11 4:42 ` Kaitao Cheng
2026-06-11 6:54 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-06-11 7:36 ` Kaitao Cheng
2026-06-11 7:52 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-06-11 12:04 ` Kaitao Cheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260609065120.74E531F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kaitao.cheng@linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox