dri-devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Melissa Wen" <mwen@igalia.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] drm/amd/display: make shaper bypass mode cleaner
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2026 12:32:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260609123256.ED5DB1F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260609121230.1358786-6-mwen@igalia.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

New issues:
- [High] Removing the `enabled` fallback leaves the shaper transfer function in a corrupted state if an invalid 1D LUT size is provided.

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Atomic check silently ignores invalid colorop LUT sizes and allocation failures in the blend transfer function.
--

commit 7d44b36a8843f15370d407ecab07d171e3f7d506
Author: Melissa Wen <mwen@igalia.com>

drm/amd/display: make shaper bypass mode cleaner

Start shaper tranfer function setup in bypass mode, i.e. tf->type ==
TF_TYPE_BYPASS and let the helper checks set it to a different mode
according to userspace request.

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_color.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_color.c
> index 13ad7ac1e35e4..4651241433296 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_color.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_color.c
> @@ -1648,10 +1648,11 @@ __set_dm_plane_colorop_shaper(struct drm_plane_state *plane_state,
>  	struct dc_transfer_func *tf = &dc_plane_state->in_shaper_func;
>  	const struct drm_color_lut32 *shaper_lut;
>  	struct drm_device *dev = colorop->dev;
> -	bool enabled = false;
>  	u32 shaper_size;
>  	int i = 0, ret = 0;
>  
> +	tf->type = TF_TYPE_BYPASS;
> +
>  	/* 1D Curve - SHAPER TF */
>  	old_colorop = colorop;
>  	for_each_new_colorop_in_state(state, colorop, new_colorop_state, i) {

[ ... ]

> @@ -1702,13 +1702,9 @@ __set_dm_plane_colorop_shaper(struct drm_plane_state *plane_state,
>  			ret = __set_output_tf_32(tf, shaper_lut, shaper_size, false);
>  			if (ret)
>  				return ret;
> -			enabled = true;
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	if (!enabled)
> -		tf->type = TF_TYPE_BYPASS;
> -
>  	return 0;
>  }

[Severity: High]
Does removing the enabled fallback leave the shaper transfer function in a
corrupted state if an invalid 1D LUT size is provided?

If userspace sets bypass = false but provides an invalid LUT size or unsets
the data blob (size = 0), the check for shaper_size == colorop->size fails
and __set_output_tf_32() is skipped in __set_dm_plane_colorop_shaper().

Since tf->type was already set to TF_TYPE_DISTRIBUTED_POINTS earlier in the
function, and we no longer fall back to TF_TYPE_BYPASS when enabled is false,
the function returns 0. Could this cause the atomic commit to succeed while
programming the hardware with an uninitialized transfer function?

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but a similar problem exists in
__set_dm_plane_colorop_blend().

Does the atomic check silently ignore invalid colorop LUT sizes and allocation
failures in the blend transfer function?

drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_color.c:__set_dm_plane_colorop_blend() {
	...
		/* Custom LUT size must be the same as supported size */
		if (blend_size == colorop->size)
			__set_input_tf_32(NULL, tf, blend_lut, blend_size);
	}

	return 0;
}

If the size check fails, __set_input_tf_32() is skipped entirely, but the
function returns 0. Also, the return value of __set_input_tf_32() is ignored,
meaning allocation failures are not propagated. Could this allow the hardware
to be programmed with an uninitialized or partially initialized transfer
function?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260609121230.1358786-1-mwen@igalia.com?part=5

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-09 12:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-09 11:51 [PATCH v3 0/7] don't allow changes to inactive colorops Melissa Wen
2026-06-09 11:51 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] drm/atomic: only add states of active or transient active colorops Melissa Wen
2026-06-09 12:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-25 22:28   ` John Harrison
2026-07-20 11:06     ` Melissa Wen
2026-06-09 11:51 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] drm/atomic: reject colorop update from inactive color pipeline Melissa Wen
2026-06-09 12:37   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-25 22:38   ` John Harrison
2026-07-20 11:40     ` Melissa Wen
2026-06-09 11:51 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] drm/amd/display: don't check colorop status if its in an inactive pipeline Melissa Wen
2026-06-25 22:52   ` John Harrison
2026-07-20 11:28     ` Melissa Wen
2026-06-09 11:51 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] drm/amd/display: truly bypass plane colorop 3x4 matrix and hdr mult Melissa Wen
2026-06-09 12:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 11:51 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] drm/amd/display: make shaper bypass mode cleaner Melissa Wen
2026-06-09 12:32   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-09 11:51 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] drm/amd/display: fix bnld colorop bypass mode Melissa Wen
2026-06-09 12:51   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 11:51 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] drm/amd/display: allow individual colorop changes Melissa Wen
2026-06-09 12:50   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-24 20:54 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] don't allow changes to inactive colorops Harry Wentland

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260609123256.ED5DB1F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=mwen@igalia.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox