dri-devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer" <pierre-eric.pelloux-prayer@amd.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] drm/amdgpu: move debug_vm handling to amdgpu_cs_parser_fini
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2026 09:39:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260622093929.EEC1C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260622092859.3600-1-pierre-eric.pelloux-prayer@amd.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Moving `amdgpu_vm_bo_invalidate()` to `amdgpu_cs_parser_fini()` accesses BO structures without holding their `dma_resv` reservation locks, leading to data races, potential use-after-free vulnerabilities, and lockdep assertions.
--

commit 130b94ccdb3ef241f2576b6d31544c37bb57192b
Author: Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer <pierre-eric.pelloux-prayer@amd.com>

drm/amdgpu: move debug_vm handling to amdgpu_cs_parser_fini

The commit restarts the CS if the validation is still in progress, but when
debug_vm is enabled, all BOs are invalidated, causing an infinite loop. This
patch moves the BO invalidation to amdgpu_cs_parser_fini to avoid that.

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c
> index d63fbc7c568de..7e75c536dab3d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -1382,6 +1369,8 @@ static int amdgpu_cs_submit(struct amdgpu_cs_parser *p,
>  /* Cleanup the parser structure */
>  static void amdgpu_cs_parser_fini(struct amdgpu_cs_parser *parser)
>  {
> +	struct amdgpu_device *adev = parser->adev;
> +	struct amdgpu_bo_list_entry *e;
>  	unsigned int i;
>  
>  	amdgpu_sync_free(&parser->sync);

[ ... ]

> @@ -1397,8 +1386,21 @@ static void amdgpu_cs_parser_fini(struct amdgpu_cs_parser *parser)
>  
>  	if (parser->ctx)
>  		amdgpu_ctx_put(parser->ctx);
> -	if (parser->bo_list)
> +	if (parser->bo_list) {
> +		if (adev->debug_vm) {
> +			/* Invalidate all BOs to test for userspace bugs */
> +			amdgpu_bo_list_for_each_entry(e, parser->bo_list) {
> +				struct amdgpu_bo *bo = e->bo;
> +
> +				/* ignore duplicates */
> +				if (!bo)
> +					continue;
> +
> +				amdgpu_vm_bo_invalidate(bo, false);

[Severity: High]
Does moving this invalidation here result in accessing the BO structures
without their reservation locks?

Earlier in amdgpu_cs_parser_fini(), drm_exec_fini() is called to drop
all dma_resv locks acquired during parsing:

amdgpu_cs_parser_fini() {
...
    amdgpu_sync_free(&parser->sync);
    drm_exec_fini(&parser->exec);
...

Since amdgpu_vm_bo_invalidate() iterates over the bo->vm_bo list, which
is protected by the BO's reservation lock, could this unlocked access
lead to a data race or a use-after-free if it races with concurrent
mapping operations like amdgpu_vm_bo_del()?

Additionally, if any of the BOs are always-valid, this will eventually call
amdgpu_vm_bo_moved(), which triggers an amdgpu_vm_assert_locked(vm) lockdep
assertion since the root PD lock was already dropped.

> +			}
> +		}
>  		amdgpu_bo_list_put(parser->bo_list);
> +	}
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < parser->nchunks; i++)
>  		kvfree(parser->chunks[i].kdata);

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260622092859.3600-1-pierre-eric.pelloux-prayer@amd.com?part=1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-06-22  9:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-22  9:28 [PATCH v1 1/2] drm/amdgpu: move debug_vm handling to amdgpu_cs_parser_fini Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer
2026-06-22  9:28 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] drm/amdgpu: remove left-over variable Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer
2026-06-22  9:39 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-22 12:19 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] drm/amdgpu: move debug_vm handling to amdgpu_cs_parser_fini Christian König

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260622093929.EEC1C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=pierre-eric.pelloux-prayer@amd.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox