dri-devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Dave Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nouveau/instmem: use iomapping interface for instmem handling
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 22:49:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260623224957.8FB771F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260623223320.3837840-1-airlied@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Critical] Passing `iobj->bar->addr` to `io_mapping_map_wc` without truncating the VMM base address causes an out-of-bounds pointer calculation on 64-bit systems.
- [High] Unconditional io_mapping_init_wc() of the entire NVKM_BAR2_INST breaks driver probe on constrained architectures and completely bypasses the existing graceful BAR0 fallback when BAR2 is missing or unmappable.
- [High] The patch introduces a type confusion vulnerability and potential resource leak in `nv50_instmem_dtor` due to structural assumptions.
--

commit f429f6c462c04142327023f718eaa2eb0469d838
Author: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

nouveau/instmem: use iomapping interface for instmem handling

This patch transitions the nouveau driver's instmem handling to use the
io_mapping API. Instead of individually mapping and unmapping instobjs
with ioremap_wc(), it maps the entire BAR2 region upfront during
initialization and maps offsets as needed.

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/instmem/nv50.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/instmem/nv50.c
> index 6fbaa1e5876dc..929246bde72d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/instmem/nv50.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/instmem/nv50.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -172,8 +175,7 @@ nv50_instobj_kmap(struct nv50_instobj *iobj, struct nvkm_vmm *vmm)
>  
>  	/* Make the mapping visible to the host. */
>  	iobj->bar = bar;
> -	iobj->map = ioremap_wc(device->func->resource_addr(device, NVKM_BAR2_INST) +
> -			       (u32)iobj->bar->addr, size);
> +	iobj->map = io_mapping_map_wc(&imem->iomap, iobj->bar->addr, size);

[Severity: Critical]
Is it possible this leads to an out-of-bounds pointer calculation on 64-bit
systems?

The bar2 VMM is initialized with a starting address of 0x0100000000ULL (4GB),
meaning iobj->bar->addr returns an address >= 4GB. Before this patch, the
u32 cast implicitly truncated the 4GB base to extract just the internal offset.

Since io_mapping_map_wc() takes an unsigned long offset, passing the full
64-bit u64 value will preserve the 4GB base, resulting in a pointer that is
out of bounds by at least 4GB.

>  	if (!iobj->map) {
>  		nvkm_warn(subdev, "PRAMIN ioremap failed\n");
>  		nvkm_vmm_put(vmm, &iobj->bar);

[ ... ]

> @@ -409,7 +411,10 @@ nv50_instmem_fini(struct nvkm_instmem *base)
>  static void *
>  nv50_instmem_dtor(struct nvkm_instmem *base)
>  {
> -	return nv50_instmem(base);
> +	struct nv50_instmem *imem = nv50_instmem(base);
> +
> +	io_mapping_fini(&imem->iomap);
> +	return imem;

[Severity: High]
What happens when this destructor is called for derived classes?

In nv50_instmem_new(), if nvkm_gsp_rm() is enabled, the creation is delegated
to r535_instmem_new(&nv50_instmem, ...). This reuses the nv50_instmem
function table (which contains this destructor) but allocates a different
structure.

If the base pointer does not belong to a struct nv50_instmem, won't calling
io_mapping_fini(&imem->iomap) result in type confusion and cause iounmap()
to operate on garbage memory?

>  }

[ ... ]

> @@ -433,8 +438,16 @@ nv50_instmem_new_(const struct nvkm_instmem_func *func,
>  
>  	if (!(imem = kzalloc_obj(*imem)))
>  		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	if (!io_mapping_init_wc(&imem->iomap, device->func->resource_addr(device, NVKM_BAR2_INST),
> +				device->func->resource_size(device, NVKM_BAR2_INST))) {
> +		kfree(imem);
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +

[Severity: High]
Will this unconditional initialization break driver probe on systems where the
full BAR2 region cannot be mapped?

Previously, small ioremap_wc() allocations were made on demand, and if they
failed, the driver gracefully fell back to accessing memory safely via the
BAR0 window.

By attempting to map the entire NVKM_BAR2_INST resource upfront and aborting
on failure, it seems the fallback mechanism is bypassed entirely, which could
cause initialization failures on 32-bit architectures or if BAR2 is
exceptionally large.

>  	nvkm_instmem_ctor(func, device, type, inst, &imem->base);
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&imem->lru);

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260623223320.3837840-1-airlied@gmail.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-23 22:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-23 22:33 [PATCH] nouveau/instmem: use iomapping interface for instmem handling Dave Airlie
2026-06-23 22:49 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-01 21:52 ` Danilo Krummrich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260623224957.8FB771F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox