From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Andre Luiz Batista Bueno" <andrebueno.mac@gmail.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 RESEND] drm/amdgpu: deduplicate JPEG v5.0 interrupt routine
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2026 07:56:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260624075659.E17921F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260624033134.145561-1-andrebueno.mac@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Potential out-of-bounds array access when indexing `node_id_to_phys_map` with unvalidated `entry->node_id`.
--
commit 9ee6645118b792b4fedbe83c62cc09cc3bce36b1
Author: Andre Luiz Batista Bueno <andrebueno.mac@gmail.com>
drm/amdgpu: deduplicate JPEG v5.0 interrupt routine
This commit deduplicates identical interrupt processing routines in
jpeg_v5_0_1.c and jpeg_v5_0_2.c. It updates jpeg_v5_0_1_process_interrupt()
to be non-static and calls it directly from the jpeg_v5_0_2 interrupt
handlers to avoid code duplication.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/jpeg_v5_0_1.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/jpeg_v5_0_1.c
> index 250316704dfac..2b8d8f4ca30d2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/jpeg_v5_0_1.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/jpeg_v5_0_1.c
> @@ -755,7 +755,7 @@ static int jpeg_v5_0_1_set_ras_interrupt_state(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>
>
>
> -static int jpeg_v5_0_1_process_interrupt(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> +int jpeg_v5_0_1_process_interrupt(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> struct amdgpu_irq_src *source,
> struct amdgpu_iv_entry *entry)
> {
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this function lack bounds checking on
entry->node_id before using it as an array index?
When the interrupt vector is read from the hardware-writeable IH ring,
entry->node_id can be an 8-bit value (0-255). Looking at how this is
handled inside jpeg_v5_0_1_process_interrupt():
int jpeg_v5_0_1_process_interrupt(...)
{
u32 i, inst;
i = node_id_to_phys_map[entry->node_id];
...
}
Could a malicious or malfunctioning PCIe device supply an interrupt vector
with a node_id >= NODEID_MAX (15), leading to an out-of-bounds read of up to
1020 bytes past the end of the node_id_to_phys_map array and a potential
kernel panic?
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260624033134.145561-1-andrebueno.mac@gmail.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-24 7:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-09 2:03 [PATCH V1 RESEND] drm/amdgpu: deduplicate JPEG v5.0 interrupt routine Andre Luiz Batista Bueno
2026-05-11 14:55 ` Alex Deucher
2026-06-11 2:40 ` [PATCH v2] " Andre Luiz Batista Bueno
2026-06-11 10:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-24 3:30 ` [PATCH V2 RESEND] " Andre Luiz Batista Bueno
2026-06-24 7:56 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260624075659.E17921F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=andrebueno.mac@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox