dri-devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Andre Luiz Batista Bueno" <andrebueno.mac@gmail.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 RESEND] drm/amdgpu: deduplicate JPEG v5.0 interrupt routine
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2026 07:56:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260624075659.E17921F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260624033134.145561-1-andrebueno.mac@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Potential out-of-bounds array access when indexing `node_id_to_phys_map` with unvalidated `entry->node_id`.
--

commit 9ee6645118b792b4fedbe83c62cc09cc3bce36b1
Author: Andre Luiz Batista Bueno <andrebueno.mac@gmail.com>

drm/amdgpu: deduplicate JPEG v5.0 interrupt routine

This commit deduplicates identical interrupt processing routines in
jpeg_v5_0_1.c and jpeg_v5_0_2.c. It updates jpeg_v5_0_1_process_interrupt()
to be non-static and calls it directly from the jpeg_v5_0_2 interrupt
handlers to avoid code duplication.

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/jpeg_v5_0_1.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/jpeg_v5_0_1.c
> index 250316704dfac..2b8d8f4ca30d2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/jpeg_v5_0_1.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/jpeg_v5_0_1.c
> @@ -755,7 +755,7 @@ static int jpeg_v5_0_1_set_ras_interrupt_state(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>  
>  
>  
> -static int jpeg_v5_0_1_process_interrupt(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> +int jpeg_v5_0_1_process_interrupt(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>  					 struct amdgpu_irq_src *source,
>  					 struct amdgpu_iv_entry *entry)
>  {

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this function lack bounds checking on
entry->node_id before using it as an array index?

When the interrupt vector is read from the hardware-writeable IH ring,
entry->node_id can be an 8-bit value (0-255). Looking at how this is
handled inside jpeg_v5_0_1_process_interrupt():

int jpeg_v5_0_1_process_interrupt(...)
{
	u32 i, inst;

	i = node_id_to_phys_map[entry->node_id];
        ...
}

Could a malicious or malfunctioning PCIe device supply an interrupt vector
with a node_id >= NODEID_MAX (15), leading to an out-of-bounds read of up to
1020 bytes past the end of the node_id_to_phys_map array and a potential
kernel panic?

[ ... ]

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260624033134.145561-1-andrebueno.mac@gmail.com?part=1

      reply	other threads:[~2026-06-24  7:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-09  2:03 [PATCH V1 RESEND] drm/amdgpu: deduplicate JPEG v5.0 interrupt routine Andre Luiz Batista Bueno
2026-05-11 14:55 ` Alex Deucher
2026-06-11  2:40   ` [PATCH v2] " Andre Luiz Batista Bueno
2026-06-11 10:59     ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-24  3:30   ` [PATCH V2 RESEND] " Andre Luiz Batista Bueno
2026-06-24  7:56     ` sashiko-bot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260624075659.E17921F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrebueno.mac@gmail.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox