From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Juergen Gross" <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/32] agp/nvidia: Stop using 32-bit MSR interfaces
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2026 06:25:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260629062527.B615C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260629060526.3638272-22-jgross@suse.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but there is a memory leak of the ioremap virtual memory area on suspend/resume.
- [High] This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but an ignored initialization error on resume leads to a guaranteed NULL pointer dereference in the hardware TLB flush path.
- [High] This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but a missing break in a timeout loop causes a soft lockup if the hardware fails to complete a TLB flush.
--
commit 809ee345f7a00dcaa6e844219a8b666a3f9ffadb
Author: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
agp/nvidia: Stop using 32-bit MSR interfaces
This commit replaces the deprecated 32-bit MSR interfaces rdmsr() and wrmsr()
with their 64-bit equivalents in the NVIDIA AGP driver. This is part of a
planned removal of the 32-bit variants.
> diff --git a/drivers/char/agp/nvidia-agp.c b/drivers/char/agp/nvidia-agp.c
> index 4787391bb6b4f..3e760bc00afaa 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/agp/nvidia-agp.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/agp/nvidia-agp.c
[ ... ]
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but I noticed a potential memory
leak on suspend/resume.
Does this code leak the vmap area leading to vmalloc space exhaustion after
repeated suspend/resume cycles?
drivers/char/agp/nvidia-agp.c:nvidia_configure() {
...
/* map aperture */
apbase_phys = pci_resource_start(agp_bridge->dev, AGP_APERTURE_BAR);
nvidia_private.aperture =
(volatile u32 __iomem *) ioremap(apbase_phys, 33 * PAGE_SIZE);
...
}
Because the driver defines no suspend hook:
drivers/char/agp/nvidia-agp.c:
...
static DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(agp_nvidia_pm_ops, NULL, agp_nvidia_resume);
...
The previous ioremap allocation is never unmapped via iounmap() when the
system suspends.
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but I spotted a potential NULL pointer
dereference in the hardware TLB flush path.
Could a failure in nvidia_configure() during resume lead to a kernel crash?
drivers/char/agp/nvidia-agp.c:agp_nvidia_resume() {
...
/* reconfigure AGP hardware again */
nvidia_configure();
return 0;
}
The return value of nvidia_configure() is ignored. If ioremap fails during
resume, nvidia_configure() returns -ENOMEM and nvidia_private.aperture
remains NULL.
Later, when nvidia_tlbflush() is called, it unconditionally dereferences
nvidia_private.aperture:
drivers/char/agp/nvidia-agp.c:nvidia_tlbflush() {
...
/* flush TLB entries */
for (i = 0; i < 32 + 1; i++)
temp = readl(nvidia_private.aperture+(i * PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(u32)));
...
}
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but the timeout loop in
nvidia_tlbflush() appears to be missing a break statement.
Can this cause a soft lockup if the hardware fails to complete a TLB flush?
drivers/char/agp/nvidia-agp.c:nvidia_tlbflush() {
...
end = jiffies + 3*HZ;
do {
pci_read_config_dword(nvidia_private.dev_1,
NVIDIA_1_WBC, &wbc_reg);
if (time_before_eq(end, jiffies)) {
printk(KERN_ERR PFX
"TLB flush took more than 3 seconds.\n");
}
} while (wbc_reg & nvidia_private.wbc_mask);
...
}
If the hardware enters an unexpected state and the timeout expires, the code
prints an error message but lacks a break statement to exit the loop, which
could trap the kernel in an infinite loop.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260629060526.3638272-1-jgross@suse.com?part=21
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-29 6:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-29 6:04 [PATCH 00/32] x86/msr: Drop 32-bit MSR interfaces Juergen Gross
2026-06-29 6:05 ` [PATCH 21/32] agp/nvidia: Stop using " Juergen Gross
2026-06-29 6:25 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-29 6:05 ` [PATCH 22/32] fbdev/geode: " Juergen Gross
2026-06-29 6:05 ` [PATCH 31/32] treewide: convert rdmsrq() from a macro to an inline function Juergen Gross
2026-06-29 6:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-29 6:52 ` [PATCH 00/32] x86/msr: Drop 32-bit MSR interfaces Arnd Bergmann
2026-06-29 7:01 ` Jürgen Groß
2026-06-29 8:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-06-29 8:15 ` Jürgen Groß
2026-06-29 8:38 ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-06-30 20:06 ` H. Peter Anvin
2026-06-29 11:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2026-06-30 18:59 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-07-01 8:33 ` Jürgen Groß
2026-07-02 10:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2026-07-02 11:03 ` Juergen Gross
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260629062527.B615C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox