From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@kernel.org>
Cc: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] gpiolib: introduce gpio_name() helper
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2026 14:10:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260629141012.D45851F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260629135917.1308621-1-arnd@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Uncanceled timer in the probe error path leads to a Use-After-Free when the timer fires.
- [High] Uncanceled delayed work in the probe error path and early IRQ request lead to Use-After-Free.
- [High] The return value of extcon_rtk_type_c_edev_register() is assigned but never checked, leading to silent failures.
--
commit fd9fdd473dd5d54a8f94bae5e74133accbec590a
Author: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
gpiolib: introduce gpio_name() helper
Most remaining users of desc_to_gpio() only call it for printing debug
information.
Replace this with a new gpiod_name() helper that returns the
gpio_desc->name string after checking the gpio_desc pointer.
> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-rtk-type-c.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-rtk-type-c.c
> index 82b60b927e41a..fb57e9d7ddb63 100644
> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-rtk-type-c.c
> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-rtk-type-c.c
> @@ -1356,8 +1356,8 @@ static int extcon_rtk_type_c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> (int)PTR_ERR(gpio));
> } else {
> type_c->rd_ctrl_gpio_desc = gpio;
> - dev_dbg(dev, "%s get rd-ctrl-gpios (id=%d) OK\n",
> - __func__, desc_to_gpio(gpio));
> + dev_dbg(dev, "%s get rd-ctrl-gpios (id=%s) OK\n",
> + __func__, gpiod_name(gpio));
> }
> }
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but I noticed a potential use-after-free if
extcon_rtk_type_c_init() fails.
In extcon_rtk_type_c_probe(), the code requests an IRQ before the delayed
work is initialized:
ret = devm_request_irq(dev, type_c->irq, type_c_detect_irq, ...);
...
INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&type_c->delayed_work, host_device_switch);
ret = extcon_rtk_type_c_init(type_c);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, "%s failed to init type_c\n", __func__);
goto err;
}
Could an early interrupt schedule the uninitialized work?
Also, if extcon_rtk_type_c_init() fails, the code jumps to the err label
and returns without canceling the delayed work. Since the structure is
freed by devres, will this cause a use-after-free when the work executes?
[Severity: High]
This is also a pre-existing issue, but further down in the same function,
the return value of extcon_rtk_type_c_edev_register() is assigned to ret
but is not checked:
ret = extcon_rtk_type_c_edev_register(type_c);
create_debug_files(type_c);
return 0;
Could this mask a registration failure, since the function unconditionally
returns 0?
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/at91_udc.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/at91_udc.c
> index 5aa360ba4f039..0993136043870 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/at91_udc.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/at91_udc.c
> @@ -1896,8 +1896,8 @@ static int at91udc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> gpiod_to_irq(udc->board.vbus_pin),
> at91_vbus_irq, 0, driver_name, udc);
> if (retval) {
> - DBG("request vbus irq %d failed\n",
> - desc_to_gpio(udc->board.vbus_pin));
> + DBG("request vbus irq %s failed\n",
> + gpiod_name(udc->board.vbus_pin));
> goto err_unprepare_iclk;
> }
> }
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but there appears to be a missing timer cleanup
in the probe error path.
In at91udc_probe(), when vbus_polled is true, a timer is armed:
if (udc->board.vbus_polled) {
INIT_WORK(&udc->vbus_timer_work, at91_vbus_timer_work);
timer_setup(&udc->vbus_timer, at91_vbus_timer, 0);
mod_timer(&udc->vbus_timer,
jiffies + VBUS_POLL_TIMEOUT);
}
If usb_add_gadget_udc() fails later, the code jumps to err_unprepare_iclk
and returns without deleting the timer:
retval = usb_add_gadget_udc(dev, &udc->gadget);
if (retval)
goto err_unprepare_iclk;
...
err_unprepare_iclk:
clk_unprepare(udc->iclk);
err_unprepare_fclk:
clk_unprepare(udc->fclk);
return retval;
If the probe fails, devres will free the udc structure. Does this mean the
timer can still fire and access the freed udc memory, causing a
use-after-free?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260629135917.1308621-1-arnd@kernel.org?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-29 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-29 13:56 [PATCH] [RFC] gpiolib: introduce gpio_name() helper Arnd Bergmann
2026-06-29 14:10 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-29 15:23 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-06-29 15:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-06-29 15:29 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-06-29 15:48 ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-06-30 16:01 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-07-01 8:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260629141012.D45851F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox