From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Brajesh Gupta" <brajesh.gupta@imgtec.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] drm/imagination: Fix double call to drm_sched_entity_fini()
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 09:52:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260630095216.498D61F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260630-b4-sched_fix-v5-1-2a84cbf18bfe@imgtec.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 4 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] Exposing a partially initialized context via `xa_alloc` allows concurrent destruction, leading to a NULL pointer dereference or Use-After-Free.
- [Critical] Concurrent execution of `pvr_submit_jobs` and `pvr_context_destroy` leads to leaked jobs, contexts, and Use-After-Free vulnerabilities.
- [High] Use-After-Free of `ctx->fw_obj` in the `pvr_context_create` error path when `xa_alloc` fails.
- [High] ABBA deadlock between pvr_queue_device_pre_reset() and the DRM scheduler run job worker.
--
commit 98944fa2f1c44497ea7e4317dca4599e33e19c35
Author: Brajesh Gupta <brajesh.gupta@imgtec.com>
drm/imagination: Fix double call to drm_sched_entity_fini()
This commit prevents a double call to drm_sched_entity_fini() during context
destruction by only calling it in the pvr_context_create() failure path. The
prior logic incorrectly triggered entity destruction from both pvr_queue_kill()
and pvr_queue_destroy().
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/imagination/pvr_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/imagination/pvr_context.c
> index eba4694400b5a..b6f9e078315dc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/imagination/pvr_context.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/imagination/pvr_context.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -349,7 +351,7 @@ int pvr_context_create(struct pvr_file *pvr_file, struct drm_pvr_ioctl_create_co
> pvr_fw_object_destroy(ctx->fw_obj);
>
> err_destroy_queues:
> - pvr_context_destroy_queues(ctx);
> + pvr_context_destroy_queues(ctx, true);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this error path lead to a use-after-free
if context handles or memory are exhausted?
If xa_alloc() fails earlier in pvr_context_create(), the error path jumps to
err_destroy_fw_obj, which calls pvr_fw_object_destroy(ctx->fw_obj). This frees
the firmware object but leaves the pointer in ctx->fw_obj intact.
Execution then falls through to err_destroy_queues, which calls
pvr_context_destroy_queues() -> pvr_queue_destroy() ->
pvr_queue_cleanup_fw_context().
Since queue->ctx->fw_obj is non-NULL, pvr_queue_cleanup_fw_context() will call
pvr_fw_structure_cleanup() on the already-freed pointer, causing a
use-after-free:
drivers/gpu/drm/imagination/pvr_queue.c:pvr_queue_cleanup_fw_context() {
if (!queue->ctx->fw_obj)
return 0;
return pvr_fw_structure_cleanup(queue->ctx->pvr_dev, ...);
}
Could ctx->fw_obj be set to NULL after destruction, or could this cleanup logic
be restructured to avoid accessing the freed pointer?
[Severity: Critical]
This is also a pre-existing issue, but does the successful creation path
expose a partially initialized context to userspace?
In pvr_context_create(), after successfully allocating a handle via xa_alloc(),
the context handle is immediately visible to userspace:
drivers/gpu/drm/imagination/pvr_context.c:pvr_context_create() {
err = xa_alloc(&pvr_file->ctx_handles, &args->handle, ctx,
xa_limit_32b, GFP_KERNEL);
if (err)
goto err_destroy_fw_obj;
spin_lock(&pvr_dev->ctx_list_lock);
list_add_tail(&ctx->file_link, &pvr_file->contexts);
...
}
If a concurrent thread guesses the newly allocated handle and calls
pvr_ioctl_destroy_context() before list_add_tail() completes, it will
find the context, remove it, and drop its reference. This triggers
pvr_context_release(), which calls list_del(&ctx->file_link). Since
ctx->file_link is still NULL, this dereferences a NULL pointer.
If list debugging catches it, the original thread might still access
the freed context to add it to the list, leading to a use-after-free.
Should the context be fully initialized and added to the list before it
is exposed via xa_alloc()?
>
> err_free_ctx_id:
> /*
[ ... ]
> @@ -384,7 +386,7 @@ pvr_context_release(struct kref *ref_count)
> spin_unlock(&pvr_dev->ctx_list_lock);
>
> xa_erase(&pvr_dev->ctx_ids, ctx->ctx_id);
> - pvr_context_destroy_queues(ctx);
> + pvr_context_destroy_queues(ctx, false);
> pvr_fw_object_destroy(ctx->fw_obj);
> kfree(ctx->data);
> pvr_vm_context_put(ctx->vm_ctx);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/imagination/pvr_queue.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/imagination/pvr_queue.c
> index 7ed60e1c1a866..941c017399fc3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/imagination/pvr_queue.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/imagination/pvr_queue.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1439,11 +1439,12 @@ void pvr_queue_kill(struct pvr_queue *queue)
> /**
> * pvr_queue_destroy() - Destroy a queue.
> * @queue: The queue to destroy.
> + * @cleanup_queue_entity: Whether to cleanup the queue entity.
> *
> * Cleanup the queue and free the resources attached to it. Should be
> * called from the context release function.
> */
> -void pvr_queue_destroy(struct pvr_queue *queue)
> +void pvr_queue_destroy(struct pvr_queue *queue, bool cleanup_queue_entity)
> {
> if (!queue)
> return;
> @@ -1453,7 +1454,8 @@ void pvr_queue_destroy(struct pvr_queue *queue)
> mutex_unlock(&queue->ctx->pvr_dev->queues.lock);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does taking pvr_dev->queues.lock here or
during GPU reset risk a deadlock with the scheduler's run job worker?
During a GPU reset, pvr_queue_device_pre_reset() takes queues.lock and
then calls pvr_queue_stop() -> drm_sched_stop() -> drm_sched_wqueue_stop(),
which waits for the currently executing scheduler job to finish:
drivers/gpu/drm/imagination/pvr_queue.c:pvr_queue_device_pre_reset() {
mutex_lock(&pvr_dev->queues.lock);
list_for_each_entry(queue, &pvr_dev->queues.idle, node)
pvr_queue_stop(queue, NULL);
...
}
Concurrently, if the scheduler is executing drm_sched_run_job_work() ->
pvr_queue_run_job() -> pvr_queue_submit_job_to_cccb() ->
pvr_queue_update_active_state(), it will try to acquire the same queues.lock:
drivers/gpu/drm/imagination/pvr_queue.c:pvr_queue_update_active_state() {
mutex_lock(&pvr_dev->queues.lock);
pvr_queue_update_active_state_locked(queue);
mutex_unlock(&pvr_dev->queues.lock);
}
This creates a scenario where the reset path holds queues.lock and waits for
the job worker to finish, while the job worker is blocked trying to acquire
queues.lock. Can this deadlock be avoided?
>
> drm_sched_fini(&queue->scheduler);
> - drm_sched_entity_fini(&queue->entity);
> + if (cleanup_queue_entity)
> + drm_sched_entity_fini(&queue->entity);
[Severity: Critical]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does killing the queue entity
early lead to leaked jobs and a use-after-free if jobs are still being pushed?
In pvr_context_destroy(), if another thread is simultaneously executing
pvr_submit_jobs(), it might hold a valid reference to the context. However,
pvr_context_destroy() calls pvr_context_kill_queues(), which forcibly destroys
the scheduler entity before the context is actually released:
drivers/gpu/drm/imagination/pvr_context.c:pvr_context_destroy() {
pvr_context_kill_queues(ctx);
/* Release the reference held by the handle set. */
pvr_context_put(ctx);
}
This destroys the DRM scheduler entity via drm_sched_entity_destroy(), which
also frees entity->stats.
Meanwhile, the concurrent thread in pvr_submit_jobs() can proceed to push jobs
to this destroyed entity:
drivers/gpu/drm/imagination/pvr_job.c:pvr_submit_jobs() {
...
for (i = 0; i < args->jobs_count; i++) {
pvr_queue_job_arm(jobs[i]);
}
...
}
pvr_queue_job_arm() -> drm_sched_job_arm() will access the freed entity->stats
via drm_sched_entity_stats_get(), causing a use-after-free. Additionally, the
pushed jobs are permanently leaked, which in turn leaks the context they hold a
reference to.
Should the entity destruction be deferred until the context reference count
reaches zero?
>
> if (WARN_ON(queue->last_queued_job_scheduled_fence))
> dma_fence_put(queue->last_queued_job_scheduled_fence);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260630-b4-sched_fix-v5-1-2a84cbf18bfe@imgtec.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-30 9:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-30 9:25 [PATCH v5] drm/imagination: Fix double call to drm_sched_entity_fini() Brajesh Gupta
2026-06-30 9:52 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260630095216.498D61F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=brajesh.gupta@imgtec.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox