From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Kishore Batta" <kishore.batta@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/7] bus: mhi: Add QDU100 Sahara variant and firmware fallback
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2026 10:53:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260701105315.46E501F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260701-sahara_protocol_new_v2-v6-4-3a78362c4741@oss.qualcomm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 5 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [Medium] The firmware fallback mechanism inadvertently changes the behavior for existing AIC100 and AIC200 devices, bypassing their explicit allowlist and contradicting the commit message.
- [Low] The `dev_err` statement in the fallback error path uses a signed format specifier `%d` to print an unsigned 32-bit integer.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] A malicious or malfunctioning device can trigger a NULL pointer dereference or Use-After-Free by requesting an image transfer with `image_id` equal to `SAHARA_IMAGE_ID_NONE` (0xFFFFFFFF).
- [High] Missing cancellation of `read_data_work` during driver removal leads to a Use-After-Free of `context` and `context->firmware`.
- [High] Lockless concurrency between `fw_work` and `read_data_work` allows a device-triggered Use-After-Free during firmware streaming.
--
commit e80f9e2e7047bfa82528957f04343840159ae175
Author: Kishore Batta <kishore.batta@oss.qualcomm.com>
bus: mhi: Add QDU100 Sahara variant and firmware fallback
Extend the probe time variant selection to match the SAHARA MHI channel for
QDU100 devices. Add a firmware lookup fallback to provision images dynamically
if they aren't explicitly listed in the image table.
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/mhi/host/clients/sahara/sahara.c b/drivers/bus/mhi/host/clients/sahara/sahara.c
> index e339c67e236af..9adbd84859073 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/mhi/host/clients/sahara/sahara.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/mhi/host/clients/sahara/sahara.c
> @@ -189,6 +189,7 @@ static bool is_streaming(struct sahara_context *context)
>
> static int sahara_find_image(struct sahara_context *context, u32 image_id)
> {
> + char *fw_path;
> int ret;
>
> if (image_id == context->active_image_id)
> return 0;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but can a malicious or malfunctioning device
trigger a NULL pointer dereference or use-after-free here?
If a device requests an image transfer with image_id equal to
SAHARA_IMAGE_ID_NONE (0xFFFFFFFF), context->active_image_id is initialized and
reset to this value. sahara_find_image() would return success (0) without
acquiring firmware.
Later, sahara_read_data() unconditionally dereferences context->firmware->size,
which would be NULL or a dangling pointer.
[ ... ]
> @@ -201,8 +202,28 @@ static int sahara_find_image(struct sahara_context *context, u32 image_id)
> }
>
> if (image_id >= context->table_size || !context->image_table[image_id]) {
> - dev_err(&context->mhi_dev->dev, "request for unknown image: %d\n", image_id);
> - return -EINVAL;
> + if (!context->fw_folder) {
> + dev_err(&context->mhi_dev->dev,
> + "Request for unknown image: %u (no fw folder)\n", image_id);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
[Severity: Medium]
The commit message states this change does not affect behavior for existing
AIC100 and AIC200 devices. However, legacy AIC devices populate fw_folder at
probe time.
Since this check relies on !context->fw_folder instead of matching against the
SAHARA channel, will legacy AIC devices fall through to the VFS lookup via
firmware_request_nowarn() instead of immediately returning -EINVAL?
> +
> + fw_path = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "qcom/%s/%u",
> + context->fw_folder, image_id);
> + if (!fw_path)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + ret = firmware_request_nowarn(&context->firmware,
> + fw_path,
> + &context->mhi_dev->dev);
> + kfree(fw_path);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&context->mhi_dev->dev,
> + "request for unknown image: %d\n", image_id);
[Severity: Low]
Is %d the correct format specifier here? image_id is a u32, so if the
requested ID is greater than INT_MAX, it will be printed as a negative number.
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + context->active_image_id = image_id;
> + return 0;
> }
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does device teardown systematically omit
canceling read_data_work?
When the driver is unbound, sahara_mhi_remove() calls cancel_work_sync() for
fw_work and dump_work, but fails to cancel read_data_work. If read_data_work
is pending or executing, it can run after remove() returns, leading to a
use-after-free of the devres-managed context.
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but is there lockless concurrency between
fw_work and read_data_work that allows a device-triggered use-after-free?
During firmware streaming, sahara_read_data() schedules read_data_work. If a
device sends a SAHARA_END_OF_IMAGE_CMD immediately after a read request, the
command is processed by fw_work which calls sahara_release_image() to free
context->firmware.
Because these are independent work items without synchronization, could an
untrusted MHI device deliberately race the EOI command against the executing
streaming task?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260701-sahara_protocol_new_v2-v6-0-3a78362c4741@oss.qualcomm.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-01 10:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-01 10:37 [PATCH v6 0/7] Qualcomm Sahara protocol enhancements Kishore Batta
2026-07-01 10:37 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] Add documentation for Sahara protocol Kishore Batta
2026-07-01 10:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 4:46 ` Randy Dunlap
2026-07-13 7:20 ` Kishore Batta
2026-07-01 10:37 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] bus: mhi: Move Sahara protocol driver under MHI host client drivers Kishore Batta
2026-07-01 10:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 10:37 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] bus: mhi: Centralize Sahara firmware image table selection at probe time Kishore Batta
2026-07-01 10:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 10:37 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] bus: mhi: Add QDU100 Sahara variant and firmware fallback Kishore Batta
2026-07-01 10:53 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-09 6:19 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-07-13 7:25 ` Kishore Batta
2026-07-13 17:11 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-07-13 14:16 ` Kishore Batta
2026-07-13 16:19 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-07-01 10:37 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] bus: mhi: Load DDR training data using device serial number Kishore Batta
2026-07-01 10:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 6:21 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-07-13 7:27 ` Kishore Batta
2026-07-01 10:37 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] bus: mhi: Capture DDR training data via command mode Kishore Batta
2026-07-01 10:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 10:37 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] bus: mhi: Expose DDR training data via controller sysfs Kishore Batta
2026-07-01 10:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 6:57 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-07-13 7:30 ` Kishore Batta
2026-07-13 17:08 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260701105315.46E501F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kishore.batta@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox