dri-devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Maarten Lankhorst" <dev@lankhorst.se>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] drm/i915/display: Move vblank put until after critical section
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2026 07:34:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260702073427.939C71F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260702072154.171324-6-dev@lankhorst.se>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The fix for moving `drm_crtc_vblank_put()` out of the time-sensitive critical section was only applied to the legacy cursor update, leaving the identical anti-pattern in the main atomic update path.
--

commit 43066708128be1b281ea9a6a390e979ec4569021
Author: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>

    drm/i915/display: Move vblank put until after critical section

This commit moves drm_crtc_vblank_put() after the time-sensitive critical
section in intel_legacy_cursor_update() to avoid acquiring locks with
interrupts disabled. It also introduces a flag to defer putting the vblank
reference until programming is completed.

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cursor.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cursor.c
> index 88384dea868b4..68b44a00567e4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cursor.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cursor.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -922,8 +925,6 @@ intel_legacy_cursor_update(struct drm_plane *_plane,
>  		local_irq_disable();
>  
>  		intel_vblank_evade(&evade);
> -
> -		drm_crtc_vblank_put(&crtc->base);
>  	} else {
>  		local_irq_disable();
>  	}
> @@ -939,6 +940,9 @@ intel_legacy_cursor_update(struct drm_plane *_plane,
>  
>  	intel_psr_unlock(crtc_state);
>  
> +	if (has_vblank)
> +		drm_crtc_vblank_put(&crtc->base);
> +

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but should the same fix be applied
to the main atomic update path in intel_pipe_update_start()?

If the kernel parameter drm.vblankoffdelay < 0 is set, dropping the vblank
reference synchronously takes dev->vbl_lock inside vblank_disable_fn().
On PREEMPT_RT kernels, acquiring this spinlock (rt_mutex) with hardware
interrupts disabled causes a "BUG: sleeping function called from invalid
context" panic. Even on non-RT kernels, taking locks here causes jitter
that can disrupt hardware programming.

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc.c:intel_pipe_update_start() {
    ...
	local_irq_disable();

	crtc->debug.min_vbl = evade.min;
	crtc->debug.max_vbl = evade.max;
	trace_intel_pipe_update_start(crtc);

	scanline = intel_vblank_evade(&evade);

	drm_crtc_vblank_put(&crtc->base);
    ...
}

Could drm_crtc_vblank_put() also be moved out of the IRQ-disabled section
here?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260702072154.171324-1-dev@lankhorst.se?part=5

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-02  7:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-02  7:21 [PATCH 00/10] drm/intel/display: Changes required to make vblank evasion PREEMPT_RT safe Maarten Lankhorst
2026-07-02  7:21 ` [PATCH 01/10] drm/vblank_work: Add methods to schedule vblank_work in 2 stages Maarten Lankhorst
2026-07-02  7:32   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02  7:21 ` [PATCH 02/10] drm/vblank: Add a 2-stage version of drm_crtc_arm_vblank_event Maarten Lankhorst
2026-07-02  7:35   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02  7:21 ` [PATCH 03/10] drm/intel/display: Make intel_crtc_arm_vblank_event static Maarten Lankhorst
2026-07-10 14:20   ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-07-02  7:21 ` [PATCH 04/10] drm/intel/display: Convert vblank event handling to 2-stage arming Maarten Lankhorst
2026-07-02  7:37   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02  7:21 ` [PATCH 05/10] drm/i915/display: Move vblank put until after critical section Maarten Lankhorst
2026-07-02  7:34   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-02  7:21 ` [PATCH 06/10] drm/i915/display: Remove locking from intel_vblank_evade " Maarten Lankhorst
2026-07-02  7:36   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02  7:21 ` [PATCH 07/10] drm/i915/display: Handle vlv dsi workaround in scanline_in_safe_range too Maarten Lankhorst
2026-07-02  7:30   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02  7:21 ` [PATCH 08/10] drm/i915: Use preempt_disable/enable_rt() where recommended Maarten Lankhorst
2026-07-02  7:36   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02  7:21 ` [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915/display: Make get_vblank_counter use intel_de_read_fw() Maarten Lankhorst
2026-07-02  7:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 14:34   ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-07-02  7:21 ` [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915/display: Do not take uncore lock in i915_get_vblank_counter Maarten Lankhorst
2026-07-10 14:19   ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-07-10 14:43 ` [PATCH 00/10] drm/intel/display: Changes required to make vblank evasion PREEMPT_RT safe Ville Syrjälä

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260702073427.939C71F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=dev@lankhorst.se \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox