From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Maarten Lankhorst" <dev@lankhorst.se>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] drm/i915/display: Move vblank put until after critical section
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2026 07:34:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260702073427.939C71F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260702072154.171324-6-dev@lankhorst.se>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The fix for moving `drm_crtc_vblank_put()` out of the time-sensitive critical section was only applied to the legacy cursor update, leaving the identical anti-pattern in the main atomic update path.
--
commit 43066708128be1b281ea9a6a390e979ec4569021
Author: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>
drm/i915/display: Move vblank put until after critical section
This commit moves drm_crtc_vblank_put() after the time-sensitive critical
section in intel_legacy_cursor_update() to avoid acquiring locks with
interrupts disabled. It also introduces a flag to defer putting the vblank
reference until programming is completed.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cursor.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cursor.c
> index 88384dea868b4..68b44a00567e4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cursor.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cursor.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -922,8 +925,6 @@ intel_legacy_cursor_update(struct drm_plane *_plane,
> local_irq_disable();
>
> intel_vblank_evade(&evade);
> -
> - drm_crtc_vblank_put(&crtc->base);
> } else {
> local_irq_disable();
> }
> @@ -939,6 +940,9 @@ intel_legacy_cursor_update(struct drm_plane *_plane,
>
> intel_psr_unlock(crtc_state);
>
> + if (has_vblank)
> + drm_crtc_vblank_put(&crtc->base);
> +
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but should the same fix be applied
to the main atomic update path in intel_pipe_update_start()?
If the kernel parameter drm.vblankoffdelay < 0 is set, dropping the vblank
reference synchronously takes dev->vbl_lock inside vblank_disable_fn().
On PREEMPT_RT kernels, acquiring this spinlock (rt_mutex) with hardware
interrupts disabled causes a "BUG: sleeping function called from invalid
context" panic. Even on non-RT kernels, taking locks here causes jitter
that can disrupt hardware programming.
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc.c:intel_pipe_update_start() {
...
local_irq_disable();
crtc->debug.min_vbl = evade.min;
crtc->debug.max_vbl = evade.max;
trace_intel_pipe_update_start(crtc);
scanline = intel_vblank_evade(&evade);
drm_crtc_vblank_put(&crtc->base);
...
}
Could drm_crtc_vblank_put() also be moved out of the IRQ-disabled section
here?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260702072154.171324-1-dev@lankhorst.se?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-02 7:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-02 7:21 [PATCH 00/10] drm/intel/display: Changes required to make vblank evasion PREEMPT_RT safe Maarten Lankhorst
2026-07-02 7:21 ` [PATCH 01/10] drm/vblank_work: Add methods to schedule vblank_work in 2 stages Maarten Lankhorst
2026-07-02 7:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 7:21 ` [PATCH 02/10] drm/vblank: Add a 2-stage version of drm_crtc_arm_vblank_event Maarten Lankhorst
2026-07-02 7:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 7:21 ` [PATCH 03/10] drm/intel/display: Make intel_crtc_arm_vblank_event static Maarten Lankhorst
2026-07-10 14:20 ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-07-02 7:21 ` [PATCH 04/10] drm/intel/display: Convert vblank event handling to 2-stage arming Maarten Lankhorst
2026-07-02 7:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 7:21 ` [PATCH 05/10] drm/i915/display: Move vblank put until after critical section Maarten Lankhorst
2026-07-02 7:34 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-02 7:21 ` [PATCH 06/10] drm/i915/display: Remove locking from intel_vblank_evade " Maarten Lankhorst
2026-07-02 7:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 7:21 ` [PATCH 07/10] drm/i915/display: Handle vlv dsi workaround in scanline_in_safe_range too Maarten Lankhorst
2026-07-02 7:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 7:21 ` [PATCH 08/10] drm/i915: Use preempt_disable/enable_rt() where recommended Maarten Lankhorst
2026-07-02 7:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 7:21 ` [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915/display: Make get_vblank_counter use intel_de_read_fw() Maarten Lankhorst
2026-07-02 7:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 14:34 ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-07-02 7:21 ` [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915/display: Do not take uncore lock in i915_get_vblank_counter Maarten Lankhorst
2026-07-10 14:19 ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-07-10 14:43 ` [PATCH 00/10] drm/intel/display: Changes required to make vblank evasion PREEMPT_RT safe Ville Syrjälä
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260702073427.939C71F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dev@lankhorst.se \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox