From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Pan Chuang" <panchuang@vivo.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] accel: ethosu: Remove redundant dev_err()
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 11:06:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260710110650.C304E1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260710105937.409992-2-panchuang@vivo.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Calling `drm_sched_fini()` after `drm_sched_init()` fails causes a kernel panic due to uninitialized structures.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH 1/2] accel: ethosu: Remove redundant dev_err() ---
commit ab2aa317daa0785d0207a88d5d5b51fcef216f77
Author: Pan Chuang <panchuang@vivo.com>
accel: ethosu: Remove redundant dev_err()
This commit removes redundant driver-specific error logging after
devm_request_threaded_irq(), relying on the core IRQ code to automatically
log failures.
> diff --git a/drivers/accel/ethosu/ethosu_job.c b/drivers/accel/ethosu/ethosu_job.c
> --- a/drivers/accel/ethosu/ethosu_job.c
> +++ b/drivers/accel/ethosu/ethosu_job.c
> @@ -338,10 +338,8 @@ int ethosu_job_init(struct ethosu_device *edev)
[ ... ]
> - if (ret) {
> - dev_err(dev, "failed to request irq\n");
> + if (ret)
> return ret;
> - }
>
> edev->fence_context = dma_fence_context_alloc(1);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does the error handling path later in
ethosu_job_init() cause a kernel panic if drm_sched_init() fails?
If drm_sched_init() returns an error (for example, due to an out-of-memory
condition), the code jumps to the error label:
drivers/accel/ethosu/ethosu_job.c:ethosu_job_init() {
...
ret = drm_sched_init(&edev->sched, &args);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, "Failed to create scheduler: %d\n", ret);
goto err_sched;
}
...
err_sched:
drm_sched_fini(&edev->sched);
return ret;
}
At this point, the job_scheduled waitqueue inside drm_gpu_scheduler remains
completely zero-initialized. When drm_sched_fini() attempts to wake up tasks
by calling wake_up_all(&sched->job_scheduled), the zero-initialized list_head
means its next pointer is NULL. The list_empty() check incorrectly returns
false, and the subsequent list iteration dereferences the NULL pointer.
Could this lead to an immediate panic during device probe failures?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260710105937.409992-1-panchuang@vivo.com?part=1
next parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-10 11:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260710105937.409992-1-panchuang@vivo.com>
[not found] ` <20260710105937.409992-2-panchuang@vivo.com>
2026-07-10 11:06 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
[not found] ` <20260710105937.409992-3-panchuang@vivo.com>
2026-07-10 11:09 ` [PATCH 2/2] accel: rocket: Remove redundant dev_err() sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260710110650.C304E1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=panchuang@vivo.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox