From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Esben Haabendal" <esben@geanix.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Fix problem with premature PLL locking
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2026 11:59:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260711115901.776051F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260711-ti-sn65dsi83-fixes-v1-2-d85eb5342b98@geanix.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [High] Missing SRCU read lock release in error path of sn65dsi83_atomic_enable().
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Missing SRCU read lock release in error path of sn65dsi83_reset_work().
--
--- Patch [2]: [PATCH 2/2] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Fix problem with premature PLL locking ---
commit 0c69248e520fff24e51d45bfab961991fbdb4267
Author: Esben Haabendal <esben@geanix.com>
drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Fix problem with premature PLL locking
This patch moves the PLL locking sequence from atomic_pre_enable to
atomic_enable. This ensures the DSI HS clock is running before attempting to
lock the PLL.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260120-mtkdsi-v1-1-b0f4094f3ac3@gmail.com/
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c
> index 32e9eadd7452f..e87bed3a6640b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -712,11 +697,24 @@ static void sn65dsi83_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> {
> struct sn65dsi83 *ctx = bridge_to_sn65dsi83(bridge);
> unsigned int pval;
> - int idx;
> + int idx, ret;
>
> if (!drm_bridge_enter(bridge, &idx))
> return;
>
> + /* Enable PLL */
> + regmap_write(ctx->regmap, REG_RC_PLL_EN, REG_RC_PLL_EN_PLL_EN);
> + usleep_range(3000, 4000);
> + ret = regmap_read_poll_timeout(ctx->regmap, REG_RC_LVDS_PLL, pval,
> + pval & REG_RC_LVDS_PLL_PLL_EN_STAT,
> + 1000, 100000);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(ctx->dev, "failed to lock PLL, ret=%i\n", ret);
> + /* On failure, disable PLL again and exit. */
> + regmap_write(ctx->regmap, REG_RC_PLL_EN, 0x00);
> + return;
[Severity: High]
Does this error path leak the SRCU read lock acquired by drm_bridge_enter()?
If the PLL lock fails and regmap_read_poll_timeout() returns an error, the
function returns immediately without calling drm_bridge_exit(idx).
This unreleased lock could cause subsequent calls to synchronize_srcu() to
hang during module unload or bridge unplug.
> + }
> +
> /* Clear all errors that got asserted during initialization. */
> regmap_read(ctx->regmap, REG_IRQ_STAT, &pval);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but I noticed a similar pattern in another
function in this file. Does sn65dsi83_reset_work() also leak the SRCU read
lock on failure?
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c:sn65dsi83_reset_work() {
if (!drm_bridge_enter(&ctx->bridge, &idx))
return;
...
ret = sn65dsi83_reset_pipe(ctx);
if (ret) {
dev_err(ctx->dev, "reset pipe failed %pe\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
return;
}
...
drm_bridge_exit(idx);
}
Like the atomic_enable path, if sn65dsi83_reset_pipe() fails, it appears to
return early without calling drm_bridge_exit(idx).
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260711-ti-sn65dsi83-fixes-v1-0-d85eb5342b98@geanix.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-11 11:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-11 11:51 [PATCH 0/2] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Various fixes Esben Haabendal
2026-07-11 11:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Support LVDS Channel B on SN65DSI84 Esben Haabendal
2026-07-11 11:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-11 11:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Fix problem with premature PLL locking Esben Haabendal
2026-07-11 11:59 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-11 12:26 ` Esben Haabendal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260711115901.776051F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=esben@geanix.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox