From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Lorenzo Stoakes" <ljs@kernel.org>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/13] mm/mlock: convert mlock code to use vma_flags_t
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2026 19:12:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260711191222.9CB171F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260711-b4-vma-flags-mm-v2-11-0fa2357d5431@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Page table walk callbacks trigger an infinite loop when pte_offset_map_lock() fails.
--
--- Patch [11]: [PATCH v2 11/13] mm/mlock: convert mlock code to use vma_flags_t ---
commit 4497d6e0c6929dd585b156beb8ad3252bc077a68
Author: Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>
mm/mlock: convert mlock code to use vma_flags_t
Replace use of the legacy vm_flags_t flags with vma_flags_t values
throughout the mlock logic. No functional change intended.
> diff --git a/mm/mlock.c b/mm/mlock.c
> index 34ffa954006fb..efa6716e4dfbd 100644
> --- a/mm/mlock.c
> +++ b/mm/mlock.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ static int mlock_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
> folio = pmd_folio(*pmd);
> if (folio_is_zone_device(folio))
> goto out;
> - if (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED)
> + if (vma_test(vma, VMA_LOCKED_BIT))
> mlock_folio(folio);
> else
> munlock_folio(folio);
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but while reviewing this function, I
noticed a potential infinite loop in mlock_pte_range().
When pte_offset_map_lock() returns NULL (for example, when encountering a
non-present PMD migration entry during concurrent THP migration), the callback
sets ACTION_AGAIN and returns 0:
start_pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vma->vm_mm, pmd, addr, &ptl);
if (!start_pte) {
walk->action = ACTION_AGAIN;
return 0;
}
Does this cause walk_pmd_range() to continuously retry without yielding the
CPU?
Because the function returns 0, it entirely bypasses the cond_resched()
call at the end of mlock_pte_range(). Meanwhile, ACTION_AGAIN instructs
walk_pmd_range() to jump to its retry label and re-process the exact same
PMD.
Could an unprivileged user space process trigger a soft or hard CPU lockup
by calling mlock() on a memory range during a concurrent migration?
I also noticed this exact same pattern appears in other page walk callbacks
that return 0 with ACTION_AGAIN when pte_offset_map_lock() fails, such as
queue_folios_pmd(), mincore_pte_range(), smaps_pte_range(),
pagemap_pmd_range(), gather_pte_stats(), clear_refs_pte_range(), and
pagemap2_pte_range().
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260711-b4-vma-flags-mm-v2-0-0fa2357d5431@kernel.org?part=11
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-11 19:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260711-b4-vma-flags-mm-v2-0-0fa2357d5431@kernel.org>
[not found] ` <20260711-b4-vma-flags-mm-v2-4-0fa2357d5431@kernel.org>
2026-07-11 19:02 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] mm: update generic_get_unmapped_area[_topdown]() to use vma_flags_t sashiko-bot
[not found] ` <20260711-b4-vma-flags-mm-v2-11-0fa2357d5431@kernel.org>
2026-07-11 19:12 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
[not found] ` <20260711-b4-vma-flags-mm-v2-13-0fa2357d5431@kernel.org>
2026-07-11 19:14 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] mm/mremap: convert mremap code " sashiko-bot
[not found] ` <20260711-b4-vma-flags-mm-v2-8-0fa2357d5431@kernel.org>
2026-07-11 21:02 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] mm: introduce vma_get_page_prot() and use it sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260711191222.9CB171F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox