From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Rob Clark" <robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 10/16] drm/msm/gem: Extract bookkeeping init helper
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 21:22:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260717212237.A653C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260717204841.26120-11-robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [Low] Imported dma-buf objects are incorrectly placed into the unbacked LRU list instead of the pinned LRU list.
Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] Failure path in `msm_gem_import` incorrectly treats the imported object as a native object, erroneously freeing the exporter's `sg_table` and dropping page references, leading to a NULL pointer dereference.
--
--- Patch [10]: [PATCH v6 10/16] drm/msm/gem: Extract bookkeeping init helper ---
commit e9867494af3de09952793735c8d5be5dc88c19a0
Author: Rob Clark <robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com>
drm/msm/gem: Extract bookkeeping init helper
Clean up duplicated logic between import and new paths.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c
> index a358fb5ca6d73..961e22d3c7292 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c
> @@ -1233,10 +1233,21 @@ static int msm_gem_new_impl(struct drm_device *dev, uint32_t flags,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int msm_gem_init_bookkeeping(struct drm_gem_object *obj)
> +{
> + struct msm_drm_private *priv = obj->dev->dev_private;
> +
> + drm_gem_lru_move_tail(&priv->lru.unbacked, obj);
[Severity: Low]
Does this hardcode the unbacked LRU list for all callers? The previous
code for imported objects placed them in the pinned LRU. Will this now
route an imported, page-backed object into the unbacked LRU?
> +
> + mutex_lock(&priv->obj_lock);
> + list_add_tail(&to_msm_bo(obj)->node, &priv->objects);
> + mutex_unlock(&priv->obj_lock);
> +
> + return drm_gem_create_mmap_offset(obj);
> +}
[ ... ]
> @@ -1314,13 +1316,7 @@ struct drm_gem_object *msm_gem_import(struct drm_device *dev,
> goto fail;
> }
>
> - drm_gem_lru_move_tail(&priv->lru.pinned, obj);
> -
> - mutex_lock(&priv->obj_lock);
> - list_add_tail(&msm_obj->node, &priv->objects);
> - mutex_unlock(&priv->obj_lock);
> -
> - ret = drm_gem_create_mmap_offset(obj);
> + ret = msm_gem_init_bookkeeping(obj);
> if (ret)
> goto fail;
[Severity: Critical]
This is a pre-existing issue, but can this failure path lead to a NULL
pointer dereference and double-free?
If msm_gem_init_bookkeeping() fails (e.g. from -ENOSPC) and we take this
goto fail path, drm_gem_object_put(obj) will be called.
Because import_attach is still NULL at this point, msm_gem_free_object()
will see drm_gem_is_imported(obj) as false and treat it as a native
object:
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c:msm_gem_free_object() {
if (drm_gem_is_imported(obj)) {
...
} else {
msm_gem_vunmap(obj);
put_pages(obj);
}
}
This would free the exporter's sgt using sg_free_table() and kfree().
It would also call drm_gem_put_pages() which unconditionally dereferences
obj->filp:
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c:drm_gem_put_pages() {
mapping = file_inode(obj->filp)->i_mapping;
...
}
Since this object was initialized with drm_gem_private_object_init(),
obj->filp is NULL, causing a panic.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260717204841.26120-1-robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com?part=10
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-17 21:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-17 20:48 [PATCH v6 00/16] drm/msm: A couple lazy-vm fixes Rob Clark
2026-07-17 20:48 ` [PATCH v6 01/16] drm/msm: Fix barriers accessing ctx vm Rob Clark
2026-07-17 21:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 20:48 ` [PATCH v6 02/16] drm/msm: Rework queuelock Rob Clark
2026-07-17 21:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 20:48 ` [PATCH v6 03/16] drm/msm: Synchronize VM creation on ctxlock Rob Clark
2026-07-17 21:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 20:48 ` [PATCH v6 04/16] drm/msm: Synchronize set_sysprof " Rob Clark
2026-07-17 20:48 ` [PATCH v6 05/16] drm/msm: Move nr_cmds initialization Rob Clark
2026-07-17 21:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 20:48 ` [PATCH v6 06/16] drm/msm: Remove redundant SIZE_MAX check Rob Clark
2026-07-17 20:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 20:48 ` [PATCH v6 07/16] drm/msm/a6xx: Access VM directly in submit path Rob Clark
2026-07-17 21:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 20:48 ` [PATCH v6 08/16] drm/msm: Add helper to check for per-process pgtables VM Rob Clark
2026-07-17 20:48 ` [PATCH v6 09/16] drm/msm/gem: Remove useless locking in GEM import Rob Clark
2026-07-17 21:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 20:48 ` [PATCH v6 10/16] drm/msm/gem: Extract bookkeeping init helper Rob Clark
2026-07-17 21:22 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-17 20:48 ` [PATCH v6 11/16] drm/msm/gem: Set resv before exposing obj Rob Clark
2026-07-17 21:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 20:48 ` [PATCH v6 12/16] drm/msm/gem: Validate lazy VM in GEM_NEW Rob Clark
2026-07-17 21:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 20:48 ` [PATCH v6 13/16] drm/msm: Allow lazy VM creation to fail Rob Clark
2026-07-17 20:48 ` [PATCH v6 14/16] drm/msm: Don't fallback to shared VM for VM_BIND Rob Clark
2026-07-17 21:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 20:48 ` [PATCH v6 15/16] drm/msm: Fix per-process-pgtables check Rob Clark
2026-07-17 20:48 ` [PATCH v6 16/16] drm/msm: Fixup invalid overflow check Rob Clark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260717212237.A653C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox