From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Boris Brezillon" <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/12] drm/panthor: Fix unplug in the reset path
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2026 16:01:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260804160125.5B8021F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260804-panthor-unplug-fixes-v1-12-abbbd2d41b13@collabora.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Concurrent execution of device removal and a failing reset work causes an unrecoverable AB-BA cross-thread deadlock.
--
--- Patch [12]: [PATCH 12/12] drm/panthor: Fix unplug in the reset path ---
commit cac1a79672cc7dc4544f4f69a02f107969842cb8
Author: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
drm/panthor: Fix unplug in the reset path
We can't use disable_work_sync() if panthor_device_unplug() is called
from the reset work or we'll deadlock. Pass a from_reset_work bool to
the panthor_device_unplug() function and lower the disable_work_sync()
to a disable_work() in that case.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_device.c
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_device.c
> @@ -189,13 +192,16 @@ static void panthor_device_reset_work(struct work_struct *work)
> panthor_hw_soft_reset(ptdev);
> panthor_hw_l2_power_on(ptdev);
> panthor_mmu_post_reset(ptdev);
> - ret = panthor_fw_post_reset(ptdev);
> + if (ptdev->reset.fake_failure)
> + ret = -EIO;
> + else
> + ret = panthor_fw_post_reset(ptdev);
> atomic_set(&ptdev->reset.pending, 0);
> panthor_sched_post_reset(ptdev, ret != 0);
> drm_dev_exit(cookie);
>
> if (ret) {
> - panthor_device_unplug(ptdev);
> + panthor_device_unplug(ptdev, true);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this sequence still leave an AB-BA
deadlock if driver removal runs concurrently with a failing reset work?
If CPU1 is running driver removal via panthor_remove(), it calls
panthor_device_unplug(..., false). This acquires ptdev->unplug.lock
earlier in the function.
If CPU2 is running panthor_device_reset_work(), it holds the SRCU
read lock via drm_dev_enter().
CPU1 then blocks in drm_dev_unplug() waiting for active SRCU readers.
CPU2 encounters a reset error, calls drm_dev_exit() (releasing SRCU),
and unblocks CPU1.
CPU1 continues in panthor_device_unplug() and blocks in
disable_work_sync() waiting for the reset work to finish (since it
holds ptdev->unplug.lock and from_reset_work is false):
CPU1:
panthor_remove()
panthor_device_unplug(ptdev, false)
mutex_lock(&ptdev->unplug.lock);
...
drm_dev_unplug(&ptdev->base);
...
disable_work_sync(&ptdev->reset.work);
Meanwhile, CPU2 proceeds to the error handling path and calls
panthor_device_unplug(ptdev, true). This attempts to acquire
ptdev->unplug.lock, but CPU1 already holds it:
CPU2:
panthor_device_reset_work()
...
if (ret)
panthor_device_unplug(ptdev, true)
mutex_lock(&ptdev->unplug.lock);
Could this cause both threads to hang indefinitely?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260804-panthor-unplug-fixes-v1-0-abbbd2d41b13@collabora.com?part=12
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-04 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-04 10:09 [PATCH 00/12] drm/panthor: Fix the unplug logic Boris Brezillon
2026-08-04 10:09 ` [PATCH 01/12] drm/panthor: Disable reset work before unplug Boris Brezillon
2026-08-04 10:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 10:46 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-08-04 10:09 ` [PATCH 02/12] drm/panthor: Further delay reset work enablement Boris Brezillon
2026-08-04 10:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 10:09 ` [PATCH 03/12] drm/panthor: Move the debugfs initialization to panthor_device.c Boris Brezillon
2026-08-04 12:50 ` Liviu Dudau
2026-08-04 10:09 ` [PATCH 04/12] drm/panthor: Flush the cleanup_wq before destroying the drm_device Boris Brezillon
2026-08-04 10:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 10:09 ` [PATCH 05/12] drm/panthor: Drop unused vm argument passed to panthor_vm_prepare_sync_only_op_ctx() Boris Brezillon
2026-08-04 10:09 ` [PATCH 06/12] drm/panthor: Split panthor_vm Boris Brezillon
2026-08-04 10:09 ` [PATCH 07/12] drm/panthor: Add fine-grained restrictions on VMs Boris Brezillon
2026-08-04 13:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 10:09 ` [PATCH 08/12] drm/panthor: Check AS state before disabling Boris Brezillon
2026-08-04 10:09 ` [PATCH 09/12] drm/panthor: Don't pre-allocate VMAs or page tables when preparing a full VM unmap Boris Brezillon
2026-08-04 10:09 ` [PATCH 10/12] drm/panthor: Make the VM cleanup path more robust against UAF Boris Brezillon
2026-08-04 15:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 10:09 ` [PATCH 11/12] drm/panthor: Make the unplug logic more robust Boris Brezillon
2026-08-04 15:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 10:09 ` [PATCH 12/12] drm/panthor: Fix unplug in the reset path Boris Brezillon
2026-08-04 16:01 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260804160125.5B8021F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox