dri-devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Rik van Riel" <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fbdev: bitblit: bound-check glyph index in bit_cursor()
Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2026 02:46:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260808024649.F07761F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260807221956.4e9dde5c@fangorn>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The bounds checking for glyph indices is missing in software rotation paths (fbcon_ccw.c, fbcon_cw.c, fbcon_ud.c), leaving them vulnerable to out-of-bounds heap reads.
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] fbdev: bitblit: bound-check glyph index in bit_cursor() ---
commit eb8c6b0049962d4bc836a2579e035e53104adf59
Author: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>

fbdev: bitblit: bound-check glyph index in bit_cursor()

This commit adds bounds checking for the glyph index in bit_cursor() to prevent
out-of-bounds reads when fetching glyphs. It addresses cases where the screen
buffer contains values larger than the current font's glyph count, which can
happen after a font resize or via malicious writes to /dev/vcsa.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/6a75205c.01d0871a.3a0d52.0032.GAE@google.com/
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=61b1db46218109869c14

> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/core/bitblit.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/core/bitblit.c
> index 65681dcc5930d..39f44258d793f 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/core/bitblit.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/core/bitblit.c
> @@ -273,9 +273,14 @@ static void bit_cursor(struct vc_data *vc, struct fb_info *info, bool enable,
>  	if (!vc->vc_font.data)
>  		return;
>  
> - 	c = scr_readw((u16 *) vc->vc_pos);
> +	c = scr_readw((u16 *) vc->vc_pos);
>  	attribute = get_attribute(info, c);
> -	src = vc->vc_font.data + ((c & charmask) * (w * vc->vc_font.height));
> +	c &= charmask;
> +
> +	/* Clamp to font size, same as bit_putcs_aligned() */
> +	if (c >= vc->vc_font.charcount)
> +		c = 0;
> +	src = vc->vc_font.data + (c * (w * vc->vc_font.height));

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but while checking the bounds for
the glyph index in bitblit.c is a great fix, could similar out-of-bounds
reads still occur in the software rotation paths?

Looking at the rotation code (fbcon_ccw.c, fbcon_cw.c, fbcon_ud.c), the bounds
checking appears to be missing entirely. For example, in fbcon_ccw.c:

drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbcon_ccw.c:ccw_cursor() {
    ...
    c = scr_readw((u16 *) vc->vc_pos);
    attribute = get_attribute(info, c);
    src = par->rotated.buf + ((c & charmask) * (w * vc->vc_font.width));
    ...
}

And in the putcs equivalents:

drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbcon_ccw.c:ccw_putcs_aligned() {
    ...
    src = par->rotated.buf + (scr_readw(s--) & charmask) * cellsize;
    ...
}

If a user loads a custom font with fewer than 256 or 512 glyphs (e.g., 100
glyphs), the rotation buffer par->rotated.buf is sized dynamically based on
charcount. If they then write an arbitrary 16-bit character index (e.g., 255)
to the screen buffer via /dev/vcsa using vcs_write(), these rotated blit
functions will mask the index with 0xff or 0x1ff and directly use it to index
par->rotated.buf. 

Without clamping against vc->vc_font.charcount, wouldn't this result in
reading past the end of the heap-allocated rotation buffer?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260807221956.4e9dde5c@fangorn?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-08  2:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-08  2:19 [PATCH] fbdev: bitblit: bound-check glyph index in bit_cursor() Rik van Riel
2026-08-08  2:46 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-08  5:44 ` Helge Deller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260808024649.F07761F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox