From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Nicolas Frattaroli" <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] drm/panthor: Take reqs_lock in soft_reset for clearing pending_reqs
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 15:05:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260812150524.CE9841F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260812-panthor-cache-flush-fix-v4-3-751e32901898@collabora.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Timeout paths in GPU and PWR requests return early without clearing pending flags, permanently breaking subsequent requests.
--
--- Patch [3]: [PATCH v4 3/3] drm/panthor: Take reqs_lock in soft_reset for clearing pending_reqs ---
commit d885508a531cdec1cd82fefa1c02cfc762aa4b05
Author: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com>
drm/panthor: Take reqs_lock in soft_reset for clearing pending_reqs
This commit adds a missing lock around the clearing of pending_reqs in
panthor_gpu_soft_reset().
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_gpu.c
> index 55e33f145b40b..fb2702e1e0a2e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_gpu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_gpu.c
> @@ -424,7 +424,10 @@ int panthor_gpu_soft_reset(struct panthor_device *ptdev)
> return -ETIMEDOUT;
> }
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does returning early here permanently wedge
the state machine?
If a hardware timeout occurs, this path returns -ETIMEDOUT and bypasses the
cleanup of pending_reqs. Subsequent calls to panthor_gpu_soft_reset() will
then hit the drm_WARN_ON for GPU_IRQ_RESET_COMPLETED, skip issuing the actual
hardware command, and inevitably time out again.
Similar issues appear to exist in the timeout paths for
panthor_gpu_flush_caches() and panthor_pwr_reset() where early returns
bypass clearing the pending flags.
>
> - ptdev->gpu->pending_reqs = 0;
> + scoped_guard(spinlock, &ptdev->gpu->reqs_lock) {
> + ptdev->gpu->pending_reqs = 0;
> + }
> +
> return 0;
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260812-panthor-cache-flush-fix-v4-0-751e32901898@collabora.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-12 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-12 14:07 [PATCH v4 0/3] Rework panthor's cache flush and soft reset locking Nicolas Frattaroli
2026-08-12 14:07 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] drm/panthor: Add tracepoint for cache flushing Nicolas Frattaroli
2026-08-12 15:07 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-08-19 15:37 ` Steven Price
2026-08-20 10:58 ` Liviu Dudau
2026-08-12 14:07 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] drm/panthor: Revisit reqs_lock handling in flush/reset paths Nicolas Frattaroli
2026-08-19 15:37 ` Steven Price
2026-08-20 11:03 ` Liviu Dudau
2026-08-12 14:07 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] drm/panthor: Take reqs_lock in soft_reset for clearing pending_reqs Nicolas Frattaroli
2026-08-12 15:05 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-19 15:37 ` Steven Price
2026-08-20 11:06 ` Liviu Dudau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260812150524.CE9841F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox