dri-devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Triet Hoang" <triet.hoang.dev@gmail.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] drm/rocket: Check allocations before use
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 09:45:30 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260817094530.E08781F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260817093142.975407-1-triet.hoang.dev@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 4 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] Critical NULL pointer dereference in `rocket_job_cleanup()` leading to kernel panic.
- [High] Memory leak of `scheds` array in `rocket_job_open` on success.
- [High] Fallible operations placed after `drm_sched_job_arm()` violate the strict DRM scheduler contract.
- [High] Ignored return value in `rocket_ioctl_submit()` silently swallows failed job submissions.
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v3] drm/rocket: Check allocations before use ---
commit e005f1f8daeacc5c010970453e21490c444073da
Author: Triet Hoang <triet.hoang.dev@gmail.com>

drm/rocket: Check allocations before use

This commit adds missing allocation failure checks for kvmalloc_array() in
rocket_job_push() and kmalloc_objs() in rocket_job_open(). If the
allocations fail, the code now returns -ENOMEM to prevent using null
pointers.

> diff --git a/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_job.c b/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_job.c
> index ac51bff39833f..24e1a61f71e7b 100644
> --- a/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_job.c
> +++ b/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_job.c
> @@ -192,6 +192,9 @@ static int rocket_job_push(struct rocket_job *job)
>  
>  	bos = kvmalloc_array(job->in_bo_count + job->out_bo_count, sizeof(void *),
>  			     GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!bos)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
>  	memcpy(bos, job->in_bos, job->in_bo_count * sizeof(void *));
>  	memcpy(&bos[job->in_bo_count], job->out_bos, job->out_bo_count * sizeof(void *));

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but can
rocket_acquire_object_fences() fail after drm_sched_job_arm() is called?

In rocket_job_push(), a job is armed via drm_sched_job_arm(), which
allocates its fence sequence numbers. Immediately after, a fallible
operation is called:

rocket_job_push() {
        ...
        drm_sched_job_arm(&job->base);
        job->inference_done_fence = dma_fence_get(&job->base.s_fence->finished);
        ret = rocket_acquire_object_fences(job->in_bos, job->in_bo_count,
                                           &job->base, false);
        if (ret)
                goto err_unlock;
        ...
}

If rocket_acquire_object_fences() fails, the job is aborted without being
pushed to the ring. Does this violate the DRM scheduler contract where
drm_sched_job_arm() is a point of no return? Aborting the job after it is
called creates permanent sequence number gaps.

[ ... ]

> @@ -499,7 +502,10 @@ int rocket_job_open(struct rocket_file_priv *rocket_priv)
>  	struct drm_gpu_scheduler **scheds = kmalloc_objs(*scheds,
>  							 rdev->num_cores);
>  	unsigned int core;
> -	int ret;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	if (!scheds)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
>  
>  	for (core = 0; core < rdev->num_cores; core++)
>  		scheds[core] = &rdev->cores[core].sched;
> @@ -509,9 +515,9 @@ int rocket_job_open(struct rocket_file_priv *rocket_priv)
>  				    scheds,
>  				    rdev->num_cores, NULL);
>  	if (WARN_ON(ret))
> -		return ret;
> +		kfree(scheds);
>  
> -	return 0;
> +	return ret;
>  }

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does rocket_job_open() leak the scheds
array on success when the device only has 1 scheduler?

When rdev->num_cores == 1, drm_sched_entity_init() intentionally does not
store the sched_list pointer in the entity. rocket_job_open() then returns
success without saving or freeing the scheds pointer.

Additionally, in rocket_job_close(), the cleanup path calls
kfree(entity->sched_list), which is a no-op when it is NULL, leaving the
array permanently leaked.

[Severity: Critical]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but can the cleanup path trigger
a NULL pointer dereference?

If a user submits a job with a malformed parameter and
rocket_ioctl_submit_job() fails early during rocket_copy_tasks(),
rocket_job_put() cleans up the partially initialized job. At this stage,
job->domain is still NULL.

rocket_job_cleanup() unconditionally calls the put function:

rocket_job_cleanup() {
        ...
        rocket_iommu_domain_put(job->domain);
        ...
}

Which then dereferences the pointer without a NULL check:

rocket_iommu_domain_put() {
        kref_put(&domain->kref, rocket_iommu_domain_destroy);
}

Should rocket_job_cleanup() or rocket_iommu_domain_put() verify the domain
pointer is valid before attempting to drop the reference?

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does rocket_ioctl_submit() silently drop
failed jobs?

If multiple jobs are submitted and one fails to process due to invalid BO
handles or memory allocation failures:

rocket_ioctl_submit() {
        ...
        for (i = 0; i < args->job_count; i++)
                rocket_ioctl_submit_job(dev, file, &jobs[i]);
        ...
}

The loop entirely ignores the return value of rocket_ioctl_submit_job(),
skips the failed job, and continues. The ioctl ultimately returns 0 to
userspace, which might leave userspace falsely believing all jobs were
successfully queued.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260817093142.975407-1-triet.hoang.dev@gmail.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-17  9:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-17  5:39 [PATCH] drm/rocket: Check allocations before use Triet Hoang
2026-08-17  5:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-17  7:20   ` [PATCH v2] " Triet Hoang
2026-08-17  7:35     ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-17  9:20     ` Markus Elfring
2026-08-17  9:31       ` [PATCH v3] " Triet Hoang
2026-08-17  9:45         ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-17  9:55         ` Markus Elfring
2026-08-17 11:22           ` Triet Hoang
2026-08-17  9:30     ` [PATCH v2] " Igor Paunovic
2026-08-17  9:53       ` Triet Hoang
2026-08-17 13:14       ` Triet Hoang
2026-08-17 14:01       ` [PATCH v4 1/2] " Triet Hoang
2026-08-17 14:01         ` [PATCH v4 2/2] drm/rocket: Keep scheduler allocation in rocket_file_priv Triet Hoang
2026-08-17 14:11           ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-17 17:06           ` Markus Elfring
2026-08-17 14:18         ` [PATCH v4 1/2] drm/rocket: Check allocations before use sashiko-bot
2026-08-17 16:40         ` Markus Elfring
2026-08-18  1:31           ` Triet Hoang
2026-08-18  5:48             ` [v4 " Markus Elfring
2026-08-18  6:21               ` [PATCH] " Triet Hoang
2026-08-17 14:28       ` [PATCH v2] " Triet Hoang
2026-08-18  1:55         ` Triet Hoang
2026-08-18  1:56         ` Triet Hoang
2026-08-18  4:15       ` [PATCH v5 1/2] " Triet Hoang
2026-08-18  4:15         ` [PATCH v5 2/2] drm/rocket: Keep scheduler allocation in rocket_file_priv Triet Hoang
2026-08-18  4:23           ` [PATCH v5] drm/rocket: Check allocations before use Triet Hoang
2026-08-19 16:35           ` [PATCH v5 2/2] drm/rocket: Keep scheduler allocation in rocket_file_priv Igor Paunovic
2026-08-18  4:32         ` [PATCH v5 1/2] drm/rocket: Check allocations before use sashiko-bot
2026-08-19 16:35         ` Igor Paunovic
2026-08-20  1:31           ` Triet Hoang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260817094530.E08781F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=triet.hoang.dev@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox