From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: rh_king@163.com
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/amdgpu/dc: Avoid PSR AUX WARN on unhealthy eDP link
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 03:03:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260818030310.7AD131F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260818024219.2921012-1-rh_king@163.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Callers of `dpcd_set_link_settings()` ignore its return value, turning the new early aborts into a logic flaw that causes link training to fail or fall back to lower bandwidths on transient AUX errors.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v2] drm/amdgpu/dc: Avoid PSR AUX WARN on unhealthy eDP link ---
commit 3a9a75a9b46189406373e0f0c7bc3d7ed3668c23
Author: Kean Ren <rh_king@163.com>
drm/amdgpu/dc: Avoid PSR AUX WARN on unhealthy eDP link
This commit addresses a kernel warning caused by PSR AUX timeouts on an
unhealthy eDP link after resume. It adds early returns to
dpcd_set_link_settings() when DPCD writes fail, and adds a check for active
links in edp_setup_psr().
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/link/protocols/link_dp_training.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/link/protocols/link_dp_training.c
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/link/protocols/link_dp_training.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/link/protocols/link_dp_training.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1117,15 +1117,25 @@ enum dc_status dpcd_set_link_settings(
> link->dpcd_caps.max_ln_count.bits.POST_LT_ADJ_REQ_SUPPORTED;
> }
>
> + /* Bail out on the first DPCD write failure so callers can react and
> + * subsequent operations (e.g. PSR setup) do not keep poking an
> + * unhealthy AUX channel. Without this, a transient AUX/HPD glitch
> + * during resume leads to a cascade of DPCD errors and ultimately a
> + * WARN at dce_aux_transfer_raw() because AUX_SW_DONE never asserts.
> + */
> status = core_link_write_dpcd(link, DP_DOWNSPREAD_CTRL,
> - &downspread.raw, sizeof(downspread));
> - if (status != DC_OK)
> + &downspread.raw, sizeof(downspread));
> + if (status != DC_OK) {
> DC_LOG_ERROR("%s:%d: core_link_write_dpcd (DP_DOWNSPREAD_CTRL) failed\n", __func__, __LINE__);
> + return status;
> + }
[Severity: High]
By returning early here, do we cause link training to permanently fall back
to lower bandwidths if a transient AUX error occurs?
It looks like the callers of dpcd_set_link_settings() do not check its
return value. For example, in dp_perform_8b_10b_link_training():
else
dpcd_set_link_settings(link, lt_settings);
if (lt_settings->lttpr_mode == LTTPR_MODE_NON_TRANSPARENT) {
And similarly in dp_perform_128b_132b_link_training():
dpcd_set_link_settings(link, lt_settings);
if (result == LINK_TRAINING_SUCCESS) {
result = dp_perform_128b_132b_channel_eq_done_sequence(...);
If a transient error occurs on the first DPCD write, dpcd_set_link_settings()
now bails out early and skips critical configurations like DP_LANE_COUNT_SET
and DP_LINK_BW_SET.
Because the callers ignore the return value, they will blindly proceed with
clock recovery on a sink that was not fully configured. Does this guarantee
a CR lock failure, which triggers the driver's fallback logic to permanently
downgrade the link bandwidth?
Should the callers be updated to handle the error return from
dpcd_set_link_settings() so they can abort or retry properly?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260818024219.2921012-1-rh_king@163.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-18 3:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-17 3:16 [PATCH] drm/amdgpu/dc: Avoid PSR AUX WARN on unhealthy eDP link rh_king
2026-08-17 3:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 2:42 ` [PATCH v2] " rh_king
2026-08-18 3:03 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260818030310.7AD131F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=rh_king@163.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox