From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Johan Jonker" <jbx6244@gmail.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] drm/rockchip: rk3066_hdmi: convert to devm_drm_bridge_alloc() API
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2026 12:58:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260823125800.67E571F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dea8a038-577b-45da-bff3-703e9099b7e1@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Devres allocations in component bind() cause permanent initialization failure (-EBUSY) on probe deferral.
- [High] Active devm-managed IRQ and I2C handlers access hardware with the clock disabled after unbind(), causing a system crash.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v1] drm/rockchip: rk3066_hdmi: convert to devm_drm_bridge_alloc() API ---
commit 2ee09d3b212b24956cbceb44c6bf494785f5586d
Author: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>
drm/rockchip: rk3066_hdmi: convert to devm_drm_bridge_alloc() API
The function devm_drm_bridge_alloc() is the new API for allocating DRM
bridges. This conversion was missed during the initial conversion of all
bridges to the new API.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rk3066_hdmi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rk3066_hdmi.c
> index f28d6a883e099..39c65ee07caac 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rk3066_hdmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rk3066_hdmi.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -747,9 +746,10 @@ static int rk3066_hdmi_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master,
> int irq;
> int ret;
>
> - hdmi = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*hdmi), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!hdmi)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + hdmi = devm_drm_bridge_alloc(dev, struct rk3066_hdmi, bridge,
> + &rk3066_hdmi_bridge_funcs);
> + if (IS_ERR(hdmi))
> + return PTR_ERR(hdmi);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does using devm_ allocations in the
component bind() function cause a permanent failure on probe deferral?
rk3066_hdmi_bind() allocates devres-managed resources using the component
device, including devm_platform_ioremap_resource() right below this hunk.
Devres actions are tied to the device's probe/remove lifecycle, not the
component bind/unbind lifecycle.
If bind() fails, for example when rk3066_hdmi_register() returns -EPROBE_DEFER
due to missing CRTCs, the devres resources are not freed.
When the master DRM device retries probing and calls bind() again,
devm_platform_ioremap_resource() will attempt to request the same physical
memory region via request_mem_region(). Because the first request was never
released by devres, this fails with -EBUSY, preventing the display from ever
initializing.
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but can the active devm-managed IRQ and I2C
handlers access hardware with the clock disabled after unbind(), causing a
system crash?
In rk3066_hdmi_bind(), the HDMI IRQ handler and I2C adapter are registered
using devm_request_threaded_irq() and devm_i2c_add_adapter() on the component
device.
Because they are devres-managed on the component device's probe/remove
lifecycle, they are not removed when the master DRM device unbinds and calls
rk3066_hdmi_unbind().
In rk3066_hdmi_unbind(), the hardware bus clock is explicitly disabled:
clk_disable_unprepare(hdmi->hclk);
If an I2C transfer is initiated from userspace (via /dev/i2c-*), or if a
shared IRQ fires after the master is unbound, the still-active handlers
(rk3066_hdmi_i2c_xfer or rk3066_hdmi_hardirq) will execute and access HDMI
hardware registers. Accessing hardware registers while the clock is disabled
causes a synchronous external abort (bus fault), resulting in a kernel panic.
>
> hdmi->dev = dev;
> hdmi->drm_dev = drm;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/dea8a038-577b-45da-bff3-703e9099b7e1@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-23 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-23 12:47 [PATCH v1] drm/rockchip: rk3066_hdmi: convert to devm_drm_bridge_alloc() API Johan Jonker
2026-08-23 12:58 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-23 19:10 ` Heiko Stübner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260823125800.67E571F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jbx6244@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox