From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: oushixiong1025@163.com
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/sysfb: ofdrm: Fix integer overflow in fb_size calculation
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2026 10:54:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260825105430.3B60D1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260825104134.669676-1-oushixiong1025@163.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 4 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The driver accepts any non-zero `linebytes` from the Device Tree without ensuring it is at least as large as `width * bytes_per_pixel`.
- [High] The 64-bit result of `drm_format_info_min_pitch()` is silently truncated when assigned to the 32-bit `int linebytes` variable.
- [High] The `round_up(fb_size, PAGE_SIZE)` calculation can overflow to 0 on 32-bit systems, leading to an undersized memory mapping.
- [High] On 32-bit architectures with 64-bit physical addresses (PAE/LPAE), passing a 64-bit size to `ioremap` via `devm_ioremap` truncates it to a 32-bit `size_t`.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] drm/sysfb: ofdrm: Fix integer overflow in fb_size calculation ---
commit ad44f8947b62f451f5098acf1a574e6b16699aa6
Author: Shixiong Ou <oushixiong@kylinos.cn>
drm/sysfb: ofdrm: Fix integer overflow in fb_size calculation
The framebuffer size calculation fb_size = linebytes * height can
overflow when both values are large (e.g., 46341 * 46341 > INT_MAX).
Since linebytes and height are both int types, the multiplication is
performed as int * int, which results in undefined behavior on overflow.
Use check_mul_overflow() to detect and prevent this overflow, consistent
with the approach used in simpledrm.c and corebootdrm.c.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sysfb/ofdrm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sysfb/ofdrm.c
> index 819aed466727e..a6dc34b9ec0f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sysfb/ofdrm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sysfb/ofdrm.c
> @@ -913,7 +914,10 @@ static struct ofdrm_device *ofdrm_device_create(struct drm_driver *drv,
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> }
>
> - fb_size = linebytes * height;
> + if (check_mul_overflow(linebytes, height, &fb_size)) {
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does drm_format_info_min_pitch()
called earlier in this function return a 64-bit value that is silently truncated
when assigned to the 32-bit int linebytes variable?
if (!linebytes) {
linebytes = drm_format_info_min_pitch(format, 0, width);
if (drm_WARN_ON(dev, !linebytes))
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
}
If width is maliciously large (e.g., 0x40000001), the 64-bit result could be
truncated to 4, bypassing the !linebytes check and the new check_mul_overflow()
check.
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but is there a missing lower bound check for
linebytes in the same block above?
If the Device Tree provides a maliciously small but non-zero linebytes (e.g., 4),
it bypasses the !linebytes check. It would also pass the new
check_mul_overflow() check but could cause out-of-bounds memory writes
downstream when DRM plane updates write data based on the logical width.
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but on 32-bit systems where resource_size_t is
32-bit, could round_up(fb_size, PAGE_SIZE) computed later in this function
overflow and wrap around to 0?
fb_pgbase = round_down(fb_base, PAGE_SIZE);
fb_pgsize = fb_base - fb_pgbase + round_up(fb_size, PAGE_SIZE);
If fb_size is near U32_MAX, the overflow check succeeds, but this calculation
would result in an undersized memory mapping.
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but on 32-bit architectures with 64-bit physical
addresses (PAE/LPAE), does devm_ioremap() silently truncate the 64-bit size to a
32-bit size_t?
screen_base = devm_ioremap(&pdev->dev, mem->start, resource_size(mem));
Since check_mul_overflow() checks against the 64-bit resource_size_t fb_size, a
massive size wouldn't be caught there, and would be truncated here, leading to a
smaller mapping than the DRM core expects.
> + drm_err(dev, "framebuffer size exceeds maximum\n");
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> + }
>
> /*
> * Try to figure out the address of the framebuffer. Unfortunately, Open
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260825104134.669676-1-oushixiong1025@163.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-25 10:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-25 10:41 [PATCH] drm/sysfb: ofdrm: Fix integer overflow in fb_size calculation oushixiong1025
2026-08-25 10:54 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-26 6:59 ` Thomas Zimmermann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260825105430.3B60D1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=oushixiong1025@163.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox