From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: tarund18303@gmail.com
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/dp_link_caps: Validate max link rate
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2026 02:33:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260827023304.D8F7D1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260827022035.3442-1-tarund18303@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The newly added validation check in `max_link_limits_valid()` breaks existing KUnit tests in `intel_dp_link_test.c` because the mock `intel_dp` environment does not initialize `source_rates`.
--
commit 449b7e18bca4c6d9716f634b5437a3f267bbd539
Author: tarun-tarun143 <tarund18303@gmail.com>
drm/i915/dp_link_caps: Validate max link rate
This commit validates the maximum link rate against the source-supported rates
before using the limits to calculate allowed configurations. This prevents
unsupported link rates from being accepted as a maximum link limit.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_caps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_caps.c
> index 7b6cc6055da82..0934488153bbc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_caps.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_caps.c
> @@ -710,7 +710,10 @@ static bool max_link_limits_valid(struct intel_dp_link_caps *link_caps,
> !is_power_of_2(max_link_limits->lane_count))
> return false;
>
> - /* TODO: Validate max_link_limits->rate against the source supported rates. */
> + if (intel_dp_rate_index(link_caps->dp->source_rates,
> + link_caps->dp->num_source_rates,
> + max_link_limits->rate) < 0)
> + return false;
[Severity: Medium]
Does this change cause the KUnit tests in intel_dp_link_test.c to fail?
Looking at the mock environment initialization in intel_dp_link_test_init():
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/tests/intel_dp_link_test.c:intel_dp_link_test_init() {
/* Reset the dev state for each test. */
memset(&test_ctx.dev, 0, sizeof(test_ctx.dev));
...
intel_dp->link.caps = test_ctx.link_caps_ops->init(intel_dp);
}
The mock initialization zeroes the memory but does not populate source_rates
or num_source_rates, leaving them at 0 or NULL. As a result,
intel_dp_rate_index() will evaluate to -1 during the tests.
This causes unconditional test failures when setting max limits, for example
in verify_link_caps_for_order():
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/tests/intel_dp_link_test.c:verify_link_caps_for_order() {
...
KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, ops->set_max_limits(link_caps, &old_max_limits));
}
Could the mock environment be updated to provide valid source_rates so the
tests can successfully pass this new validation check?
>
> intel_dp_link_caps_get_forced_params(link_caps, &forced_params);
> allowed_configs = calc_allowed_config_filter(link_caps, link_caps->enabled_configs,
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260827022035.3442-1-tarund18303@gmail.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-27 2:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-27 2:20 [PATCH] drm/i915/dp_link_caps: Validate max link rate tarund18303
2026-08-27 2:33 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260827023304.D8F7D1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tarund18303@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox