From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Andi Shyti" <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915/gt: Fix request use-after-free in heartbeat()
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2026 23:08:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260830230808.D88131F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260830225708.3959691-1-andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] heartbeat() dereferences the local pointer `rq` without holding a strong reference, making it vulnerable to a Use-After-Free if intel_engine_park_heartbeat() concurrently clears the shared pointer.
--
commit aa7ae2412e3834bb064c9442f0f96ffd0058a8ae
Author: Shuangpeng Bai <shuangpeng.kernel@gmail.com>
drm/i915/gt: Fix request use-after-free in heartbeat()
This commit addresses a request use-after-free in heartbeat() by using cmpxchg
to manage the detached systole reference and replacing direct struct accesses
with a local pointer.
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260808184302.1509585-1-shuangpeng.kernel@gmail.com
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_heartbeat.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_heartbeat.c
> index 6424ecce8bcbe..fc6c53c93cf57 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_heartbeat.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_heartbeat.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -152,9 +160,11 @@ static void heartbeat(struct work_struct *wrk)
> if (rq) {
> if (i915_request_completed(rq))
> i915_request_put(rq);
> - else
> - engine->heartbeat.systole = rq;
> + /* Keep a newer pulse that raced with the detached systole. */
> + else if (cmpxchg(&engine->heartbeat.systole, NULL, rq))
> + i915_request_put(rq);
> }
> + rq = READ_ONCE(engine->heartbeat.systole);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does heartbeat() safely dereference rq
without holding a strong reference?
If userspace toggles sysfs heartbeat intervals, intel_engine_park_heartbeat()
can execute concurrently, clearing the shared pointer and dropping the
reference:
intel_engine_park_heartbeat() {
...
rq = xchg(&engine->heartbeat.systole, NULL);
if (rq)
i915_request_put(rq);
...
}
Since rq is loaded locklessly here without a reference bump, could this
result in a Use-After-Free later in heartbeat() when accessing
rq->emitted_jiffies?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260830225708.3959691-1-andi.shyti@linux.intel.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-30 23:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-30 22:57 [PATCH v2] drm/i915/gt: Fix request use-after-free in heartbeat() Andi Shyti
2026-08-30 23:08 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260830230808.D88131F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=andi.shyti@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox