From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Mukesh Ojha" <mukesh.ojha@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/11] drm: kmb: Use devm_of_reserved_mem_device_init()
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2026 20:31:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260902203137.1474A1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260902201640.2024648-8-mukesh.ojha@oss.qualcomm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The return value of kmb_initialize_clocks() is ignored in kmb_hw_init(), leading to potential hardware hangs.
- [High] Calling drm_atomic_helper_shutdown() after disabling clocks and PM runtime leads to hardware access on a powered-down device and a system hang.
- [High] Dereferencing an ERR_PTR during error handling of DSI initialization causes a kernel panic.
--
commit ce6024d25a2085ae8c8a68d80d92293c0cb8ad15
Author: Mukesh Ojha <mukesh.ojha@oss.qualcomm.com>
drm: kmb: Use devm_of_reserved_mem_device_init()
This commit updates the driver to use the devres-managed variant of
of_reserved_mem_device_init(), simplifying the error and removal paths by
removing manual cleanup calls.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/kmb/kmb_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/kmb/kmb_drv.c
> index 7c2eb1152fc2f..88fe377940f30 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/kmb/kmb_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/kmb/kmb_drv.c
> @@ -140,13 +140,12 @@ static int kmb_hw_init(struct drm_device *drm, unsigned long flags)
> /* Allocate LCD interrupt resources */
> irq_lcd = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but I noticed that just before this hunk in
kmb_hw_init(), the return value of kmb_initialize_clocks() is discarded:
/* Enable display clocks */
kmb_initialize_clocks(kmb, &pdev->dev);
/* Register irqs here - section 17.3 in databook
If kmb_initialize_clocks() fails, the driver proceeds with probe and will
eventually access unclocked MMIO registers during modeset. Can this lead to
synchronous external aborts and system hangs?
[ ... ]
> @@ -465,8 +459,6 @@ static void kmb_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> pm_runtime_put_sync(drm->dev);
> pm_runtime_disable(drm->dev);
>
> - of_reserved_mem_device_release(drm->dev);
> -
> /* Release clks */
> kmb_display_clk_disable(kmb);
>
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does the shutdown sequence
in kmb_remove() cause hardware access on a powered-down device?
Right after this hunk, the function completes with:
/* Unregister DSI host */
kmb_dsi_host_unregister(kmb->kmb_dsi);
drm_atomic_helper_shutdown(drm);
}
Since pm_runtime_disable() and kmb_display_clk_disable() are called prior to
drm_atomic_helper_shutdown(), atomic_disable callbacks will read and write
hardware registers while clocks are disabled. Will this cause a bus fault or
system hang during driver unbind?
[Severity: High]
This is also a pre-existing issue, but outside the diff in kmb_probe(), does
the error handling for kmb_dsi_init() cause an invalid pointer dereference?
If kmb_dsi_init() fails, it returns an ERR_PTR:
kmb->kmb_dsi = kmb_dsi_init(dsi_pdev);
if (IS_ERR(kmb->kmb_dsi)) {
drm_err(&kmb->drm, "failed to initialize DSI\n");
ret = PTR_ERR(kmb->kmb_dsi);
goto err_free1;
}
The error handling path unconditionally passes this ERR_PTR to
kmb_dsi_host_unregister(), which passes it to kmb_dsi_clk_disable(). This
dereferences the pointer when attempting to access kmb_dsi->clk_mipi:
drivers/gpu/drm/kmb/kmb_dsi.c:kmb_dsi_clk_disable() {
clk_disable_unprepare(kmb_dsi->clk_mipi);
Will this result in a kernel panic due to dereferencing the ERR_PTR on memory
allocation failure during initialization?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260902201640.2024648-1-mukesh.ojha@oss.qualcomm.com?part=7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-02 20:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-02 20:16 [PATCH v2 0/11] drm: Use devm_of_reserved_mem_device_init() Mukesh Ojha
2026-09-02 20:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/11] drm: logicvc: " Mukesh Ojha
2026-09-02 20:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 20:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/11] drm: hdlcd: " Mukesh Ojha
2026-09-02 20:16 ` [PATCH v2 3/11] drm: pl111: " Mukesh Ojha
2026-09-02 20:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 20:16 ` [PATCH v2 4/11] drm: komeda: " Mukesh Ojha
2026-09-02 20:16 ` [PATCH v2 5/11] drm: malidp: " Mukesh Ojha
2026-09-02 20:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 20:16 ` [PATCH v2 6/11] drm: ingenic: " Mukesh Ojha
2026-09-02 20:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 20:16 ` [PATCH v2 7/11] drm: kmb: " Mukesh Ojha
2026-09-02 20:31 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-02 20:16 ` [PATCH v2 8/11] drm: sun4i: " Mukesh Ojha
2026-09-02 20:16 ` [PATCH v2 9/11] drm: xlnx: zynqmp_dpsub: " Mukesh Ojha
2026-09-02 20:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 20:55 ` Laurent Pinchart
2026-09-02 20:16 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] drm: aspeed: " Mukesh Ojha
2026-09-02 20:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 20:16 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] drm: arcpgu: " Mukesh Ojha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260902203137.1474A1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mukesh.ojha@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox