From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Myeonghun Pak" <mhun512@gmail.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fbdev: sstfb: use managed PCI device enable
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 00:18:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260911001831.98D081F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260911000835.88909-1-mhun512@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Unregistering the framebuffer after tearing down hardware mappings creates an exploitable use-after-free/unmap race condition.
- [High] Hardware is left in an active, initialized state on probe error paths because `sst_shutdown()` is missing.
- [High] `__sst_wait_idle()` contains an unbounded busy loop that will silently hang the CPU if the device becomes unresponsive.
--
commit 9516997f46dea14ef20c216ac89acefd0aaf2e36
Author: Myeonghun Pak <mhun512@gmail.com>
fbdev: sstfb: use managed PCI device enable
This commit updates sstfb_probe() to use pcim_enable_device() instead of
pci_enable_device(). This ensures that the PCI device is automatically
disabled by the PCI core after a probe failure or driver removal. The driver
still explicitly releases its other resources.
> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/sstfb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/sstfb.c
> index 2745557822f76..039279feb5bf4 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/sstfb.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/sstfb.c
> @@ -1332,7 +1332,8 @@ static int sstfb_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
> return err;
>
> /* Enable device in PCI config. */
> - if ((err=pci_enable_device(pdev))) {
> + err = pcim_enable_device(pdev);
> + if (err) {
> printk(KERN_ERR "cannot enable device\n");
> return err;
> }
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but hardware is left in an active, initialized
state on probe error paths because sst_shutdown() is missing.
During sstfb_probe(), sst_init() is called to configure the hardware. If a
subsequent initialization step fails, the error path unwinds memory but omits
calling sst_shutdown():
drivers/video/fbdev/sstfb.c:sstfb_probe() {
...
if (!sst_init(info, par)) {
printk(KERN_ERR "sstfb: Init failed\n");
goto fail;
}
...
fail:
iounmap(info->screen_base);
...
}
Would this leave the PCI device fully active and configured, potentially
breaking system functionality like leaving VGA pass-through disabled?
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but unregistering the framebuffer after tearing
down hardware mappings creates an exploitable use-after-free/unmap race
condition.
If a user opens the framebuffer device, and then the driver is unbound,
sstfb_remove() unmaps the memory before unregistering the framebuffer:
drivers/video/fbdev/sstfb.c:sstfb_remove() {
...
iounmap(info->screen_base);
iounmap(par->mmio_vbase);
...
unregister_framebuffer(info);
...
}
Could a user then issue an ioctl (like SSTFB_SET_VGAPASS), which calls
sstfb_ioctl() and accesses the now-unmapped memory?
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but __sst_wait_idle() contains an unbounded
busy loop that could silently hang the CPU if the device becomes unresponsive.
__sst_wait_idle() is called repeatedly during device operation and waits for
the busy status to clear:
drivers/video/fbdev/sstfb.c:__sst_wait_idle() {
...
while(1) {
if (__sst_read(vbase, STATUS) & STATUS_FBI_BUSY) {
...
}
If the PCI device is removed (e.g., via surprise unplug) or fails, the MMIO
read will return ~0. Since STATUS_FBI_BUSY is BIT(7), the condition would
remain true indefinitely. Should there be a timeout or fallback here to
prevent a permanent kernel hang?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260911000835.88909-1-mhun512@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-11 0:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-11 0:08 [PATCH] fbdev: sstfb: use managed PCI device enable Myeonghun Pak
2026-09-11 0:18 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-12 16:09 ` Helge Deller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260911001831.98D081F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=mhun512@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).