From: "Tales A. Mendonça" <talesam@gmail.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: matthew.brost@intel.com, daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com,
stuart.summers@intel.com, julia.filipchuk@intel.com,
thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com,
jani.nikula@intel.com, navonjohnlukose@gmail.com,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Tales A. Mendonça" <talesam@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/3] drm/xe: fix GuC TLB invalidation ack stalls on ARL (Wa_22016122933)
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 13:35:50 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260917163553.1742580-1-talesam@gmail.com> (raw)
Hi,
v4 of the TLB invalidation ack stall fix for ARL, rebased on today's
drm-tip. Tracked in:
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/work_items/8678
Recap: on the standalone media GT of MTL/ARL the CPU reads stale cache
lines for data the GuC has already written. The visible symptom is TLB
invalidation acks appearing to stall for a near-constant ~2.3s. i915
works around this as Wa_22016122933; xe never inherited it. Patch 3
implements it, scoped like i915.
In v3 I asked two open questions in this cover letter. Since there was
no preference expressed, v4 makes the conservative choice in both cases
and documents the reasoning in the commit message, so the series is not
blocked on a decision:
1. CPU mapping: keeping XE_BO_FLAG_NEEDS_UC (uncached on both sides).
It is the tested configuration and no throughput difference against
the CPU-WC variant was measurable. Matching i915's exact CPU-WC +
GGTT-UC combination needs either a new BO flag or decoupling the
GGTT cache-mode selection from XE_BO_FLAG_NEEDS_UC; happy to add
that plumbing if parity is preferred.
2. Scope: covering the GuC-shared allocations (CTBs, log, ADS, SLPC,
engine activity), which is where the failures were observed. i915
additionally covers media-GT LRC/ring state; that can be a
follow-up if wanted.
Fixes:/Cc: stable are still left out, since MTL/ARL is require_force_probe
in xe. Also happy to add them.
Validation of patch 3 is now six weeks on two ARL machines (7d51 and
7dd1), across kernels 7.1.6, 7.1.8 and 7.2, with over 10M TLB
invalidations processed and zero ack stalls. Before the fix both
machines reproduced 20-60 stalls/day, every day, on two GuC firmware
versions. The 7dd1 machine, which could not survive a day of media
workloads on xe without a platform freeze, has been running xe full
time since 11 August with zero incidents.
Patches 1-2 are the diagnostics that made the investigation possible
and are unchanged since v3. checkpatch is clean on the series.
v3 -> v4:
- Rebased on drm-tip.
- Patch 3: resolved both open questions in the commit message instead
of leaving them for discussion; refreshed validation data.
Thanks,
Tales
Tales A. Mendonça (3):
drm/xe: Capture devcoredump on TLB invalidation timeout
drm/xe: Log when a timed out TLB invalidation ack finally arrives
drm/xe: Implement Wa_22016122933
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_devcoredump.c | 46 +++++++++++----------
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_devcoredump.h | 15 +++++--
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c | 16 +++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.h | 2 +
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads.c | 3 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c | 6 ++-
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_engine_activity.c | 6 ++-
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_log.c | 7 +++-
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c | 3 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tlb_inval.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tlb_inval_types.h | 17 ++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wa_oob.rules | 1 +
12 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
--
2.55.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-18 7:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-17 16:35 Tales A. Mendonça [this message]
2026-09-17 16:35 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] drm/xe: Capture devcoredump on TLB invalidation timeout Tales A. Mendonça
2026-09-17 16:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17 23:18 ` Tales A. Mendonça
2026-09-18 22:01 ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-21 18:06 ` Tales A. Mendonça
2026-09-17 16:35 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] drm/xe: Log when a timed out TLB invalidation ack finally arrives Tales A. Mendonça
2026-09-18 22:06 ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-21 5:30 ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-21 18:10 ` Tales A. Mendonça
2026-09-21 18:19 ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-17 16:35 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] drm/xe: Implement Wa_22016122933 Tales A. Mendonça
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260917163553.1742580-1-talesam@gmail.com \
--to=talesam@gmail.com \
--cc=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=julia.filipchuk@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=navonjohnlukose@gmail.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=stuart.summers@intel.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox