dri-devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Honglei Huang" <honghuan@amd.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
	"Eugenio Perez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/4] drm/virtio-gpu: Add VIRTIO_GPU_CAPSET_ROCM capability
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 10:07:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260918100746.2BB741F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260918095940.2253018-2-honghuan@amd.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] virtio-gpu: premature UAPI exposure of unfinalized capability ID
- [Low] virtio-gpu: missing DRM UAPI alias for ROCM capability set
--

commit a394228d77eeafc9f1dcc36150380f8561f1ee49
Author: Honglei Huang <honghuan@amd.com>

drm/virtio-gpu: Add VIRTIO_GPU_CAPSET_ROCM capability

This commit adds a new GPU capability set VIRTIO_GPU_CAPSET_ROCM with ID 8 
to support ROCm compute workloads. The commit message notes that the 
matching virtio-gpu specification change is currently in progress.

> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_gpu.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_gpu.h
> index 4f530d90058c7..3d4dfadc9d789 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_gpu.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_gpu.h
> @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ struct virtio_gpu_cmd_submit {
>  #define VIRTIO_GPU_CAPSET_VENUS 4
>  #define VIRTIO_GPU_CAPSET_CROSS_DOMAIN 5
>  #define VIRTIO_GPU_CAPSET_DRM 6
> +#define VIRTIO_GPU_CAPSET_ROCM 8

[Severity: Medium]
Is it safe to expose this speculative capability ID to userspace before the
virtio-gpu specification is finalized?

The commit message states the specification change for ID 8 is in progress.
Because the Linux UAPI is frozen once released, exposing this ID now could
permanently commit the kernel to ID 8 for ROCm. If the OASIS virtio
technical committee assigns a different ID or rejects the proposal, would
this leave the Linux UAPI permanently incompatible with the standard?

[Severity: Low]
Also, should there be a corresponding DRM UAPI alias added for this capability
set?

Previous capability sets have matching definitions in virtgpu_drm.h, such as
VIRTGPU_DRM_CAPSET_VENUS and VIRTGPU_DRM_CAPSET_DRM. Without adding a similar
VIRTGPU_DRM_CAPSET_ROCM alias, userspace DRM clients relying on virtgpu_drm.h
for the DRM_IOCTL_VIRTGPU_GET_CAPS ioctl will lack the necessary constant to
query ROCm capabilities natively.

>  /* VIRTIO_GPU_CMD_GET_CAPSET_INFO */
>  struct virtio_gpu_get_capset_info {

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260918095940.2253018-1-honghuan@amd.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-18 10:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-18  9:59 [PATCH v8 0/4] virtio-gpu: Add userptr support for compute workloads Honglei Huang
2026-09-18  9:59 ` [PATCH v8 1/4] drm/virtio-gpu: Add VIRTIO_GPU_CAPSET_ROCM capability Honglei Huang
2026-09-18 10:07   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-18 10:13     ` Huang, Honglei
2026-09-18 11:27       ` Akihiko Odaki
2026-09-18 15:46         ` Huang, Honglei
2026-09-19  8:00           ` Akihiko Odaki
2026-09-18  9:59 ` [PATCH v8 2/4] drm/virtgpu api: add blob userptr resource Honglei Huang
2026-09-18 10:07   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 12:12   ` Akihiko Odaki
2026-09-18 15:48     ` Huang, Honglei
2026-09-18  9:59 ` [PATCH v8 3/4] drm/virtio: implement userptr support for zero-copy memory access Honglei Huang
2026-09-18 10:21   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-19  8:59   ` Akihiko Odaki
2026-09-24  9:25     ` Huang, Honglei
2026-09-26 10:17       ` Akihiko Odaki
2026-09-18  9:59 ` [PATCH v8 4/4] drm/virtio: wire blob ioctl creation to userptr objects Honglei Huang
2026-09-18 10:08   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-19 14:28   ` Akihiko Odaki
2026-09-24  9:33     ` Huang, Honglei
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-09-18  8:23 [PATCH v8 0/4] virtio-gpu: Add userptr support for compute workloads Honglei Huang
2026-09-18  8:23 ` [PATCH v8 1/4] drm/virtio-gpu: Add VIRTIO_GPU_CAPSET_ROCM capability Honglei Huang
2026-09-18  8:29   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18  7:55 [PATCH v8 0/4] virtio-gpu: Add userptr support for compute workloads Honglei Huang
2026-09-18  7:55 ` [PATCH v8 1/4] drm/virtio-gpu: Add VIRTIO_GPU_CAPSET_ROCM capability Honglei Huang
2026-09-18  8:07   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18  6:56 [PATCH v8 0/4] virtio-gpu: Add userptr support for compute workloads Honglei Huang
2026-09-18  6:56 ` [PATCH v8 1/4] drm/virtio-gpu: Add VIRTIO_GPU_CAPSET_ROCM capability Honglei Huang
2026-09-18  5:59 [PATCH v8 0/4] virtio-gpu: Add userptr support for compute workloads Honglei Huang
2026-09-18  5:59 ` [PATCH v8 1/4] drm/virtio-gpu: Add VIRTIO_GPU_CAPSET_ROCM capability Honglei Huang
2026-09-18  6:07   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260918100746.2BB741F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=honghuan@amd.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox