From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Honglei Huang" <honghuan@amd.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
"Eugenio Perez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/4] drm/virtio-gpu: Add VIRTIO_GPU_CAPSET_ROCM capability
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 10:07:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260918100746.2BB741F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260918095940.2253018-2-honghuan@amd.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] virtio-gpu: premature UAPI exposure of unfinalized capability ID
- [Low] virtio-gpu: missing DRM UAPI alias for ROCM capability set
--
commit a394228d77eeafc9f1dcc36150380f8561f1ee49
Author: Honglei Huang <honghuan@amd.com>
drm/virtio-gpu: Add VIRTIO_GPU_CAPSET_ROCM capability
This commit adds a new GPU capability set VIRTIO_GPU_CAPSET_ROCM with ID 8
to support ROCm compute workloads. The commit message notes that the
matching virtio-gpu specification change is currently in progress.
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_gpu.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_gpu.h
> index 4f530d90058c7..3d4dfadc9d789 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_gpu.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_gpu.h
> @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ struct virtio_gpu_cmd_submit {
> #define VIRTIO_GPU_CAPSET_VENUS 4
> #define VIRTIO_GPU_CAPSET_CROSS_DOMAIN 5
> #define VIRTIO_GPU_CAPSET_DRM 6
> +#define VIRTIO_GPU_CAPSET_ROCM 8
[Severity: Medium]
Is it safe to expose this speculative capability ID to userspace before the
virtio-gpu specification is finalized?
The commit message states the specification change for ID 8 is in progress.
Because the Linux UAPI is frozen once released, exposing this ID now could
permanently commit the kernel to ID 8 for ROCm. If the OASIS virtio
technical committee assigns a different ID or rejects the proposal, would
this leave the Linux UAPI permanently incompatible with the standard?
[Severity: Low]
Also, should there be a corresponding DRM UAPI alias added for this capability
set?
Previous capability sets have matching definitions in virtgpu_drm.h, such as
VIRTGPU_DRM_CAPSET_VENUS and VIRTGPU_DRM_CAPSET_DRM. Without adding a similar
VIRTGPU_DRM_CAPSET_ROCM alias, userspace DRM clients relying on virtgpu_drm.h
for the DRM_IOCTL_VIRTGPU_GET_CAPS ioctl will lack the necessary constant to
query ROCm capabilities natively.
> /* VIRTIO_GPU_CMD_GET_CAPSET_INFO */
> struct virtio_gpu_get_capset_info {
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260918095940.2253018-1-honghuan@amd.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-18 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-18 9:59 [PATCH v8 0/4] virtio-gpu: Add userptr support for compute workloads Honglei Huang
2026-09-18 9:59 ` [PATCH v8 1/4] drm/virtio-gpu: Add VIRTIO_GPU_CAPSET_ROCM capability Honglei Huang
2026-09-18 10:07 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-18 10:13 ` Huang, Honglei
2026-09-18 11:27 ` Akihiko Odaki
2026-09-18 15:46 ` Huang, Honglei
2026-09-19 8:00 ` Akihiko Odaki
2026-09-18 9:59 ` [PATCH v8 2/4] drm/virtgpu api: add blob userptr resource Honglei Huang
2026-09-18 10:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 12:12 ` Akihiko Odaki
2026-09-18 15:48 ` Huang, Honglei
2026-09-18 9:59 ` [PATCH v8 3/4] drm/virtio: implement userptr support for zero-copy memory access Honglei Huang
2026-09-18 10:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-19 8:59 ` Akihiko Odaki
2026-09-24 9:25 ` Huang, Honglei
2026-09-26 10:17 ` Akihiko Odaki
2026-09-18 9:59 ` [PATCH v8 4/4] drm/virtio: wire blob ioctl creation to userptr objects Honglei Huang
2026-09-18 10:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-19 14:28 ` Akihiko Odaki
2026-09-24 9:33 ` Huang, Honglei
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-09-18 8:23 [PATCH v8 0/4] virtio-gpu: Add userptr support for compute workloads Honglei Huang
2026-09-18 8:23 ` [PATCH v8 1/4] drm/virtio-gpu: Add VIRTIO_GPU_CAPSET_ROCM capability Honglei Huang
2026-09-18 8:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 7:55 [PATCH v8 0/4] virtio-gpu: Add userptr support for compute workloads Honglei Huang
2026-09-18 7:55 ` [PATCH v8 1/4] drm/virtio-gpu: Add VIRTIO_GPU_CAPSET_ROCM capability Honglei Huang
2026-09-18 8:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 6:56 [PATCH v8 0/4] virtio-gpu: Add userptr support for compute workloads Honglei Huang
2026-09-18 6:56 ` [PATCH v8 1/4] drm/virtio-gpu: Add VIRTIO_GPU_CAPSET_ROCM capability Honglei Huang
2026-09-18 5:59 [PATCH v8 0/4] virtio-gpu: Add userptr support for compute workloads Honglei Huang
2026-09-18 5:59 ` [PATCH v8 1/4] drm/virtio-gpu: Add VIRTIO_GPU_CAPSET_ROCM capability Honglei Huang
2026-09-18 6:07 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260918100746.2BB741F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=honghuan@amd.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox