From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/xe: Don't unload the driver until all drm devices are freed
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 14:19:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260923141959.00D7A1F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260923140844.390822-3-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] xe: logic mismatch in xe_device_exit wait causes indefinite uninterruptible hang
--
commit b47bb26ab24e9f99fb3dd76c67cadc55ddf082fa
Author: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
drm/xe: Don't unload the driver until all drm devices are freed
This commit ensures the driver module is not unloaded until all DRM device
references are dropped by tracking a device count. It implements a module
unload wait mechanism using drm_dev_release_barrier() and a timeout check to
prevent executing code from a freed module.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1501,3 +1518,28 @@ struct xe_vm *xe_device_asid_to_vm(struct xe_device *xe, u32 asid)
>
> return vm;
> }
> +
> +/**
> + * xe_device_exit() - Device subsystem exit function.
> + *
> + * Exit function to be called at module unload time.
> + */
> +void xe_device_exit(void)
> +{
> + /*
> + * Wait for all devices to be freed. 20s is well above the typical
> + * maximum dma_fence signalling time, so warn and keep waiting if
> + * we're still not done by then, since it may indicate a leaked
> + * xe_device reference is stalling module unload.
> + */
> + if (!wait_var_event_timeout(&xe_device_count,
> + !atomic_read(&xe_device_count),
> + HZ * 20)) {
> + pr_warn("%s: Waiting for %d xe device(s) to be freed before unloading.\n",
> + DRIVER_NAME, atomic_read(&xe_device_count));
> + wait_var_event(&xe_device_count, !atomic_read(&xe_device_count));
[Severity: Medium]
The commit message mentions using a loop and printing a diagnostic every 10
seconds to avoid an indefinite, silent hang. However, this implementation
uses a single if block with a 20s timeout, followed by an unbounded
wait_var_event().
If an xe_device reference leak exists, won't this fallback to an indefinite
uninterruptible sleep and trigger the kernel's hung task watchdog?
> + }
> +
> + /* Wait for any driver release callbacks to complete */
> + drm_dev_release_barrier(®ular_driver);
> +}
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260923140844.390822-1-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-23 14:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-23 14:08 [PATCH 0/3] drm, drm/xe: Protect against premature module unloads Thomas Hellström
2026-09-23 14:08 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm: Provide a drm_dev_release_barrier() function to wait for device release callbacks Thomas Hellström
2026-09-23 14:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-23 14:08 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/xe: Don't unload the driver until all drm devices are freed Thomas Hellström
2026-09-23 14:19 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-23 14:08 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe: Route deferred xe_vma/xe_vm teardown off system_dfl_wq Thomas Hellström
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260923141959.00D7A1F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox