dri-devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
Cc: media-ci@linuxtv.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Oliver Upton" <oupton@kernel.org>,
	"Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v8 08/14] swiotlb: Align shared IO TLB pools to the shared granule size
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 10:22:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260924102254.60C431F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260924100529.1398790-9-aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] mm: infinite loop in swiotlb_init_late() when remap fails
--

commit 9e7f1b72520615870ee21508117e4c5c7e0eb684
Author: Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>

swiotlb: Align shared IO TLB pools to the shared granule size
    
This commit aligns and sizes the early memblock pool to the common CoCo
shared granule, leaving the slot count unchanged. It replaces the default
and dynamic pool set_memory calls with helpers to keep alignment validation
and architecture dispatch centralized. Pages are intentionally leaked if
their private state cannot be restored safely.

> diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> index ded7016a46a71..394db93b7eb96 100644
> --- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> +++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -578,7 +578,7 @@ int swiotlb_init_late(size_t size, gfp_t gfp_mask,
>  		swiotlb_adjust_nareas(num_possible_cpus());
>  
>  retry:
> -	order = get_order(nslabs << IO_TLB_SHIFT);
> +	order = get_order(ALIGN(nslabs << IO_TLB_SHIFT, cc_shared_granule_size()));
>  	nslabs = SLABS_PER_PAGE << order;

[Severity: Medium]
If remap() fails later in this function, nslabs is halved and the code jumps
back to the retry label to try a smaller allocation:

kernel/dma/swiotlb.c:swiotlb_init_late() {
    ...
	if (remap)
		rc = remap(vstart, nslabs);
	if (rc) {
		free_pages((unsigned long)vstart, order);

		nslabs = ALIGN(nslabs >> 1, IO_TLB_SEGSIZE);
		if (nslabs < IO_TLB_MIN_SLABS)
			return rc;
		retried = true;
		goto retry;
	}
    ...
}

Does the new ALIGN macro at the retry label risk inflating the halved size
back to its original value if cc_shared_granule_size() is >= 2MB?

If so, this would restore nslabs to its original failing value, overriding
the shrinking mechanism and creating an infinite loop.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260924100529.1398790-1-aneesh.kumar@kernel.org?part=8

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-24 10:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-24 10:05 [RFC PATCH v8 00/14] coco: guest: Add a shared-granule allocator for host-shared memory Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-09-24 10:05 ` [RFC PATCH v8 01/14] mm: Add an allocator for CoCo shared memory Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-09-24 10:19   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-24 14:22     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-09-24 18:26       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-09-24 10:05 ` [RFC PATCH v8 02/14] mm: Zero memory during shared memory transitions Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-09-24 10:22   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-25 12:08   ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-09-24 10:05 ` [RFC PATCH v8 03/14] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Resolve the default NUMA node explicitly Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-09-24 10:19   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-24 10:05 ` [RFC PATCH v8 04/14] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Allocate shared tables using CoCo shared memory allocator Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-09-24 10:19   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-24 10:05 ` [RFC PATCH v8 05/14] dma-contiguous: Derive shared alignment from DMA attributes Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-09-24 10:05 ` [RFC PATCH v8 06/14] dma-pool: Allocate CoCo atomic pools using CoCo shared memory allocator Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-09-24 10:19   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-24 10:05 ` [RFC PATCH v8 07/14] dma-direct: Align CoCo shared DMA allocations to the shared granule size Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-09-24 10:05 ` [RFC PATCH v8 08/14] swiotlb: Align shared IO TLB pools " Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-09-24 10:22   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-24 10:05 ` [RFC PATCH v8 09/14] swiotlb: Reject misaligned restricted DMA pools for CoCo guests Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-09-24 10:05 ` [RFC PATCH v8 10/14] dma-buf: system_heap: Limit scatterlist entries to the buffer size Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-09-24 10:05 ` [RFC PATCH v8 11/14] dma-buf: system_heap: Allocate shared buffers using CoCo shared memory allocator Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-09-24 10:05 ` [RFC PATCH v8 12/14] swiotlb: Make rounded shared pool capacity allocatable Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-09-24 10:05 ` [RFC PATCH v8 13/14] mm: Assert CoCo shared allocations may sleep Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-09-24 10:05 ` [RFC PATCH v8 14/14] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Preallocate VPE L1 tables Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260924102254.60C431F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=media-ci@linuxtv.org \
    --cc=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox