From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Daniel Drake" <dan@reactivated.net>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/vc4: Set DRM DMA device directly from HVS and V3D
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2026 20:47:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260927204728.EF7251F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260927-drm-dma-device-2-v1-1-3230afcdc851@reactivated.net>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] drm/vc4: dma_free_wc() used with wrong device in vc4_bo_purge()
--
commit abd61016c96bce404abb5e31405d8c24a7acfb12
Author: Daniel Drake <dan@reactivated.net>
drm/vc4: Set DRM DMA device directly from HVS and V3D
vc4 uses of_dma_configure() during bind to set the DMA configuration of
the drm device by borrowing the configuration of one of its component
devices.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hvs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hvs.c
> index e715147d091ca..305770c87dcf0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hvs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hvs.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1662,6 +1663,19 @@ static int vc4_hvs_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, void *data)
> hvs->regset.nregs = ARRAY_SIZE(vc4_hvs_regs);
> }
>
> + if (vc4->gen >= VC4_GEN_6_C) {
> + ret = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(36));
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Use the HVS as the DRM device's DMA controller for buffer
> + * allocations if one has not already been configured.
> + */
> + if (drm_dev_dma_dev(drm) == drm->dev)
> + drm_dev_set_dma_dev(drm, dev);
[Severity: High]
Will this change lead to a DMA API regression in vc4_bo_purge()?
Looking at drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_bo.c, when a DMA allocation fails under
memory pressure, vc4_bo_userspace_cache_purge() calls vc4_bo_purge() to
reclaim memory from BOs marked as DONTNEED.
In vc4_bo_purge(), the memory is freed using the virtual aggregate device
instead of the newly configured DMA device:
static void vc4_bo_purge(struct drm_gem_object *obj)
{
...
dma_free_wc(dev->dev, obj->size, bo->base.vaddr, bo->base.dma_addr);
...
}
Since buffer objects are allocated using drm_gem_dma_create(), which now
uses the properly configured drm_dev_dma_dev(drm) device, bypassing GEM
helpers and explicitly calling dma_free_wc(dev->dev, ...) breaks the DMA
API contract.
This contract requires memory to be freed with the exact same device pointer
used for allocation. Using a different device guarantees IOMMU unmap failures,
as the aggregate device no longer has a matching DMA/IOMMU configuration.
Should vc4_bo_purge() be updated to use drm_dev_dma_dev(dev) instead of
dev->dev?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260927-drm-dma-device-2-v1-1-3230afcdc851@reactivated.net?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-27 20:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-27 19:33 [PATCH] drm/vc4: Set DRM DMA device directly from HVS and V3D Daniel Drake
2026-09-27 20:47 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260927204728.EF7251F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dan@reactivated.net \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox