From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>
To: phasta@kernel.org,
"Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>,
tursulin@ursulin.net, matthew.brost@intel.com,
sumit.semwal@linaro.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] dma-buf: add dma_fence_was_initialized function v2
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2026 12:47:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <275a55e8-543e-466d-a6a1-84776e763024@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <307d764629d7c5d2704b7897c8c0c32c1ef4ce33.camel@mailbox.org>
On 02. 09. 26, 9:03, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> On Wed, 2026-09-02 at 08:56 +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> On 02. 09. 26, 8:52, Philipp Stanner wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2026-08-28 at 10:32 +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>>>> On 28. 08. 26, 9:46, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>>>>> What helps is indeed the revert back to:
>>>>>
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_release.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_release.c
>>>>> @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ qxl_release_free(struct qxl_device *qdev,
>>>>> idr_remove(&qdev->release_idr, release->id);
>>>>> spin_unlock(&qdev->release_idr_lock);
>>>>>
>>>>> - if (dma_fence_was_initialized(&release->base)) {
>>>>> + if (release->base.ops) {
>>>>
>>>> Crap, the flags simple got garbage from previous freed buffer, so:
>>>> - release = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> + release = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
>>>>
>>>> fixes this of course. Patch coming.
>>>>
>>>> Now, the ops and initialized are either both set or unset:
>>>> qxl_release_free 1: release->base.ops=0x0 initialized=0 id=6 type=2
>>>> qxl_release_free 1: release->base.ops=qxl_fence_ops initialized=1 id=2
>>>> type=0
>>>>
>>>> Unlike before.
>>>>
>>>> FTR release->base.ops were NULLed after that kmalloc. Unlike
>>>> release->base.flags.
>>>
>>> You're saying that QXL is re-using that fence if it were uninitialized?
>>
>> Sort of. The fence was dropped and freed. Then a new memory was
>> allocated. And garbage from that allocation was used -- it might be the
>> old (freed) fence. Or anything else freed previously. Simply garbage.
>
>
> Maybe even dma_fence_init() should zero out the memory for maximum
> robustness.
That would not help as dma_fence_init() is called too late or not at all
here...
dma_fence_init() is called late as the driver wants to call
dma_fence_was_initialized() to distinguish the cases when the init was
called and when not.
> We do that in drm_sched at a few places.
>
> Opinions? @Christian?
--
js
suse labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-02 10:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-20 10:54 Independence for dma_fences! v6 Christian König
2026-01-20 10:54 ` [PATCH 1/9] dma-buf: add dma_fence_was_initialized function v2 Christian König
2026-01-20 11:33 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2026-07-13 8:58 ` Jiri Slaby
2026-07-14 7:53 ` Philipp Stanner
2026-07-14 8:43 ` Philipp Stanner
2026-08-19 8:59 ` Jiri Slaby
2026-08-19 12:33 ` Philipp Stanner
2026-08-19 12:51 ` Philipp Stanner
2026-08-28 7:29 ` Jiri Slaby
2026-08-28 7:46 ` Jiri Slaby
2026-08-28 8:32 ` Jiri Slaby
2026-09-02 6:52 ` Philipp Stanner
2026-09-02 6:56 ` Jiri Slaby
2026-09-02 7:03 ` Philipp Stanner
2026-09-02 10:47 ` Jiri Slaby [this message]
2026-01-20 10:54 ` [PATCH 2/9] dma-buf: protected fence ops by RCU v5 Christian König
2026-01-20 10:54 ` [PATCH 3/9] dma-buf: detach fence ops on signal v2 Christian König
2026-01-20 10:54 ` [PATCH 4/9] dma-buf: abstract fence locking Christian König
2026-01-20 10:54 ` [PATCH 5/9] dma-buf: inline spinlock for fence protection v4 Christian König
2026-01-20 11:41 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2026-01-21 8:48 ` Christian König
2026-01-21 9:03 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2026-01-27 4:56 ` kernel test robot
2026-01-20 10:54 ` [PATCH 6/9] dma-buf/selftests: test RCU ops and inline lock v2 Christian König
2026-01-20 10:54 ` [PATCH 7/9] dma-buf: use inline lock for the stub fence v2 Christian König
2026-01-21 9:29 ` Philipp Stanner
2026-01-20 10:54 ` [PATCH 8/9] dma-buf: use inline lock for the dma-fence-array Christian König
2026-01-20 10:54 ` [PATCH 9/9] dma-buf: use inline lock for the dma-fence-chain Christian König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=275a55e8-543e-466d-a6a1-84776e763024@kernel.org \
--to=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=phasta@kernel.org \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=tursulin@ursulin.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox