From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/omap: Rework the rotation-on-crtc hack
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 14:57:33 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <31291963.BFqn2rOcCK@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170731105419.6505-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Hi Daniel,
Thank you for the patch.
On Monday 31 Jul 2017 12:54:19 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> I want/need to rework the core property handling, and this hack is
> getting in the way. But since it's a non-standard propety only used by
s/propety/property/
> legacy userspace we know that this will only every be called from
> ioctl code. And never on some other free-standing state struct, where
> this old hack wouldn't work either.
>
> v2: don't forget zorder and get_property!
>
> v3: Shadow the legacy state to avoid locking issues in get_property
> (Maarten).
>
> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com
> Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_crtc.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_drv.h | 9 ++++
> 2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_crtc.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_crtc.c index 14e8a7738b06..fc8b25748f10
> 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_crtc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_crtc.c
> @@ -498,39 +498,34 @@ static void omap_crtc_atomic_flush(struct drm_crtc
> *crtc, spin_unlock_irq(&crtc->dev->event_lock);
> }
>
> -static bool omap_crtc_is_plane_prop(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> - struct drm_property *property)
> -{
> - struct drm_device *dev = crtc->dev;
> - struct omap_drm_private *priv = dev->dev_private;
> -
> - return property == priv->zorder_prop ||
> - property == crtc->primary->rotation_property;
> -}
> -
> static int omap_crtc_atomic_set_property(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> struct drm_crtc_state *state,
> struct drm_property *property,
> uint64_t val)
> {
> - if (omap_crtc_is_plane_prop(crtc, property)) {
> - struct drm_plane_state *plane_state;
> - struct drm_plane *plane = crtc->primary;
> -
> - /*
> - * Delegate property set to the primary plane. Get the plane
> - * state and set the property directly.
> - */
> -
> - plane_state = drm_atomic_get_plane_state(state->state, plane);
> - if (IS_ERR(plane_state))
> - return PTR_ERR(plane_state);
> + struct omap_drm_private *priv = crtc->dev->dev_private;
> + struct omap_crtc_state *omap_state = to_omap_crtc_state(state);
> + struct drm_plane_state *plane_state;
>
> - return drm_atomic_plane_set_property(plane, plane_state,
> - property, val);
> + /*
> + * Delegate property set to the primary plane. Get the plane
> + * state and set the property directly.
Nitpicking, you can reformat the comment to go towards the 80 columns limit.
> + */
> + plane_state = drm_atomic_get_plane_state(state->state, crtc->primary);
> + if (IS_ERR(plane_state))
> + return PTR_ERR(plane_state);
> +
> + if (property == crtc->primary->rotation_property) {
> + plane_state->rotation = val;
> + omap_state->rotation = val;
> + } else if (property == priv->zorder_prop) {
> + plane_state->zpos = val;
> + omap_state->zpos = val;
> + } else {
> + return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - return -EINVAL;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static int omap_crtc_atomic_get_property(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> @@ -538,20 +533,37 @@ static int omap_crtc_atomic_get_property(struct
> drm_crtc *crtc, struct drm_property *property,
> uint64_t *val)
> {
> - if (omap_crtc_is_plane_prop(crtc, property)) {
> - /*
> - * Delegate property get to the primary plane. The
> - * drm_atomic_plane_get_property() function isn't exported,
but
> - * can be called through drm_object_property_get_value() as
that
> - * will call drm_atomic_get_property() for atomic drivers.
> - */
> - return drm_object_property_get_value(&crtc->primary->base,
> - property, val);
> - }
> + struct omap_drm_private *priv = crtc->dev->dev_private;
> + struct omap_crtc_state *omap_state = to_omap_crtc_state(state);
> +
> + /*
> + * Remap to the plane rotation/zorder property. We can peek at the
plane
> + * state directly since holding the crtc locks gives you a read-lock
on
> + * the plane state.
Isn't this comment outdated ?
> + */
> + if (property == crtc->primary->rotation_property)
> + return omap_state->rotation;
> + else if (property == priv->zorder_prop)
> + return omap_state->zpos;
>
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> +static struct drm_crtc_state *
> +omap_crtc_duplicate_state(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> +{
> + struct omap_crtc_state *state;
> +
> + if (WARN_ON(!crtc->state))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + state = kmalloc(sizeof(*state), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (state)
> + __drm_atomic_helper_crtc_duplicate_state(crtc, &state->base);
No need to copy the zpos and rotation fields ?
> + return &state->base;
> +}
> +
> static const struct drm_crtc_funcs omap_crtc_funcs = {
> .reset = drm_atomic_helper_crtc_reset,
> .set_config = drm_atomic_helper_set_config,
> @@ -559,7 +571,7 @@ static const struct drm_crtc_funcs omap_crtc_funcs = {
> .page_flip = drm_atomic_helper_page_flip,
> .gamma_set = drm_atomic_helper_legacy_gamma_set,
> .set_property = drm_atomic_helper_crtc_set_property,
> - .atomic_duplicate_state = drm_atomic_helper_crtc_duplicate_state,
> + .atomic_duplicate_state = omap_crtc_duplicate_state,
> .atomic_destroy_state = drm_atomic_helper_crtc_destroy_state,
> .atomic_set_property = omap_crtc_atomic_set_property,
> .atomic_get_property = omap_crtc_atomic_get_property,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_drv.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_drv.h index 4bd1e9070b31..11703c174cd8
> 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_drv.h
> @@ -115,6 +115,15 @@ static inline void omap_fbdev_free(struct drm_device
> *dev) }
> #endif
>
> +struct omap_crtc_state {
> + /* must be first */
Capitalizing comments would be appreciated :-)
> + struct drm_crtc_state base;
> + /* shadow values for legacy userspace support */
> + unsigned int rotation;
> + unsigned int zpos;
> +};
> +#define to_omap_crtc_state(x) container_of(x, struct omap_crtc_state, base)
Could you please define this structure in omap_crtc.c, as it's internal to the
CRTC handling code ?
> struct videomode *omap_crtc_timings(struct drm_crtc *crtc);
> enum omap_channel omap_crtc_channel(struct drm_crtc *crtc);
> void omap_crtc_pre_init(void);
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-31 11:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-25 8:01 [PATCH 0/8] acquire ctx for everyone! Daniel Vetter
2017-07-25 8:01 ` [PATCH 1/8] drm/omap: Simplify the rotation-on-crtc hack Daniel Vetter
2017-07-25 8:47 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2017-07-25 9:24 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2017-07-31 11:48 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-07-31 11:56 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2017-07-31 10:54 ` [PATCH] drm/omap: Rework " Daniel Vetter
2017-07-31 11:57 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2017-07-31 12:45 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-07-31 13:30 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-07-31 15:42 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-08-01 5:59 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2017-08-01 10:20 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-08-02 8:02 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-08-02 13:20 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2017-08-04 9:57 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2017-08-04 10:02 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-08-07 9:24 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2017-08-07 9:56 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2017-08-07 10:20 ` [PATCH v7] " Maarten Lankhorst
2017-08-08 12:08 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2017-07-25 8:01 ` [PATCH 2/8] drm: Don't update property values for atomic drivers Daniel Vetter
2017-07-25 8:32 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2017-07-25 12:01 ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2017-08-11 22:20 ` [PATCH 2/8] " Laurent Pinchart
2017-08-14 7:25 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-08-14 10:32 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-08-14 14:09 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-07-25 8:01 ` [PATCH 3/8] drm: Handle properties in the core " Daniel Vetter
2017-07-25 9:36 ` Archit Taneja
2017-07-25 12:02 ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2017-07-25 8:01 ` [PATCH 4/8] drm: Nuke drm_atomic_helper_crtc_set_property Daniel Vetter
2017-07-25 9:38 ` Archit Taneja
2017-07-25 10:05 ` Philippe CORNU
2017-08-03 13:34 ` Thomas Hellstrom
2017-07-25 8:01 ` [PATCH 5/8] drm: Nuke drm_atomic_helper_plane_set_property Daniel Vetter
2017-07-25 9:38 ` Archit Taneja
2017-07-25 10:06 ` Philippe CORNU
2017-07-28 16:45 ` Liviu Dudau
2017-08-08 10:03 ` Vincent ABRIOU
2017-08-08 12:31 ` Laurent Pinchart
[not found] ` <20170725080122.20548-1-daniel.vetter-/w4YWyX8dFk@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-25 8:01 ` [PATCH 6/8] drm: Nuke drm_atomic_helper_connector_set_property Daniel Vetter
[not found] ` <20170725080122.20548-7-daniel.vetter-/w4YWyX8dFk@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-25 9:23 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2017-07-25 9:26 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-08-08 10:04 ` Vincent ABRIOU
2017-07-25 8:01 ` [PATCH 7/8] drm: Nuke drm_atomic_helper_connector_dpms Daniel Vetter
2017-07-25 8:04 ` Neil Armstrong
2017-07-25 8:59 ` Philipp Zabel
2017-07-25 9:30 ` Archit Taneja
2017-07-25 10:07 ` Philippe CORNU
2017-07-25 14:01 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-07-25 14:42 ` Shawn Guo
2017-07-26 19:00 ` Noralf Trønnes
2017-08-08 10:05 ` Vincent ABRIOU
2017-07-25 8:01 ` [PATCH 8/8] drm: Nuke drm_atomic_legacy_backoff Daniel Vetter
2017-07-25 9:36 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=31291963.BFqn2rOcCK@avalon \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox