From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Alex Hung <alex.hung@amd.com>, Melissa Wen <mwen@igalia.com>,
airlied@gmail.com, maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com,
mripard@kernel.org, simona@ffwll.ch, tzimmermann@suse.de
Cc: Simon Ser <contact@emersion.fr>,
Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>,
Chaitanya Kumar Borah <chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com>,
Xaver Hugl <xaver.hugl@kde.org>,
Pekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen@collabora.com>,
Louis Chauvet <louis.chauvet@bootlin.com>,
Matthew Schwartz <matthew.schwartz@linux.dev>,
John Harrison <John.Harrison@Igalia.com>,
Rodrigo Siqueira <siqueira@igalia.com>,
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, kernel-dev@igalia.com,
Rob Clark <robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@kernel.org>,
Abhinav Kumar <abhinav.kumar@linux.dev>,
Jessica Zhang <jesszhan0024@gmail.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/atomic: only add states of active or transient active colorops
Date: Fri, 29 May 2026 16:46:32 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4452e675c4853faf665b520a8932a960946206bb@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e8aaf4da-8fb6-4d6a-95d6-563ac0562b49@amd.com>
On Tue, 26 May 2026, Alex Hung <alex.hung@amd.com> wrote:
> On 5/26/26 08:17, Melissa Wen wrote:
>> Only consider affected colorop states those that are part of an active
>> color pipeline or a pipeline that is about to be activated or
>> deactivated in the same atomic commit, i.e., colorop is in the chain of
>> old/new plane color pipeline property. To cover color_pipeline
>> deactivation, remove the condition for plane_state->color_pipeline.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Melissa Wen <mwen@igalia.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
>> index 170de30c28ae..4fb3a23e862a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
>> @@ -812,6 +812,59 @@ static int drm_atomic_plane_check(const struct drm_plane_state *old_plane_state,
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +/*
>> + * This function walks old and new plane state color pipelines and adds all
>> + * colorops in use by @plane to the atomic configuration @state. This is useful
>> + * when an atomic commit needs to check all currently enabled or about to be
>> + * enabled colorop on @plane, e.g. when changing the mode. This also avoids
>> + * including colorop states that are not part of the atomic state.
>> + *
>> + * Returns:
>> + * 0 on success or can fail with -EDEADLK or -ENOMEM. When the error is EDEADLK
>> + * then the w/w mutex code has detected a deadlock and the entire atomic
>> + * sequence must be restarted. All other errors are fatal.
>> + */
>> +static int
>> +drm_atomic_add_pipeline_colorops(struct drm_atomic_commit *state,
>> + struct drm_plane *plane)
>> +{
>> + struct drm_colorop *colorop;
>> + struct drm_colorop_state *colorop_state;
>> + struct drm_plane_state *new_plane_state, *old_plane_state;
>> +
>> + new_plane_state = drm_atomic_get_new_plane_state(state, plane);
>> + old_plane_state = drm_atomic_get_old_plane_state(state, plane);
>> +
>> + if (WARN_ON(!new_plane_state || !old_plane_state))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + drm_dbg_atomic(plane->dev,
>> + "Adding old+new pipeline colorops for [PLANE:%d:%s]\n",
>> + plane->base.id, plane->name);
>> +
>> + for (colorop = new_plane_state->color_pipeline;
>> + colorop;
>> + colorop = colorop->next) {
>
> This for-loop is used 5 times in this patchset. How about a macro in
> drm_colorop.h?
>
> #define drm_for_each_colorop_in_pipeline(colorop, pipeline) \
> for ((colorop) = (pipeline); (colorop); (colorop) = (colorop)->next)
Is there a reason struct drm_colorop reinvents lists and doesn't have
struct list_head node?
BR,
Jani.
>
>> + colorop_state = drm_atomic_get_colorop_state(state, colorop);
>> + if (IS_ERR(colorop_state))
>> + return PTR_ERR(colorop_state);
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Same color pipeline as new; no point walking old. */
>> + if (new_plane_state->color_pipeline == old_plane_state->color_pipeline)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + for (colorop = old_plane_state->color_pipeline;
>> + colorop;
>> + colorop = colorop->next) {
>> + colorop_state = drm_atomic_get_colorop_state(state, colorop);
>> + if (IS_ERR(colorop_state))
>> + return PTR_ERR(colorop_state);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> static void drm_atomic_colorop_print_state(struct drm_printer *p,
>> const struct drm_colorop_state *state)
>> {
>> @@ -1591,11 +1644,9 @@ drm_atomic_add_affected_planes(struct drm_atomic_commit *state,
>> if (IS_ERR(plane_state))
>> return PTR_ERR(plane_state);
>>
>> - if (plane_state->color_pipeline) {
>> - ret = drm_atomic_add_affected_colorops(state, plane);
>> - if (ret)
>> - return ret;
>> - }
>> + ret = drm_atomic_add_pipeline_colorops(state, plane);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> }
>> return 0;
>> }
>> @@ -1607,10 +1658,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_atomic_add_affected_planes);
>> * @plane: DRM plane
>> *
>> * This function walks the current configuration and adds all colorops
>> - * currently used by @plane to the atomic configuration @state. This is useful
>> - * when an atomic commit also needs to check all currently enabled colorop on
>> - * @plane, e.g. when changing the mode. It's also useful when re-enabling a plane
>> - * to avoid special code to force-enable all colorops.
>> + * currently used by @plane to the atomic configuration @state. It's useful
>> + * when re-enabling a plane to avoid special code to force-enable all colorops.
>> *
>> * Since acquiring a colorop state will always also acquire the w/w mutex of the
>> * current plane for that colorop (if there is any) adding all the colorop states for
>
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-29 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-26 14:17 [PATCH 0/3] don't allow changes to inactive colorops Melissa Wen
2026-05-26 14:17 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/atomic: only add states of active or transient active colorops Melissa Wen
2026-05-26 23:02 ` Alex Hung
2026-05-29 13:46 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2026-06-01 9:24 ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2026-06-03 11:27 ` Melissa Wen
2026-06-09 17:23 ` John Harrison
2026-06-24 19:01 ` Harry Wentland
2026-06-24 20:06 ` John Harrison
2026-05-26 14:17 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/atomic: duplicate state of all colorops Melissa Wen
2026-05-26 14:17 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/atomic: reject colorop update from inactive color pipeline Melissa Wen
2026-05-26 23:04 ` Alex Hung
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4452e675c4853faf665b520a8932a960946206bb@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=John.Harrison@Igalia.com \
--cc=abhinav.kumar@linux.dev \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=alex.hung@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com \
--cc=contact@emersion.fr \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jesszhan0024@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-dev@igalia.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=louis.chauvet@bootlin.com \
--cc=lumag@kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=marijn.suijten@somainline.org \
--cc=matthew.schwartz@linux.dev \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=mwen@igalia.com \
--cc=pekka.paalanen@collabora.com \
--cc=robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=sean@poorly.run \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=siqueira@igalia.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
--cc=uma.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=xaver.hugl@kde.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox