Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] drm/panthor: Add vm_bind region with kbo range overlap check

[Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>]

On 29/06/2026 21:17, Adrián Larumbe wrote:
> When a VM is created, caller has to specify the range of the address space
> carve-out set aside for mapping kernel BO's. That means vm_bind mappings of
> UM-exposed BO's should not intersect with that region, but at the moment
> we're not checking this.
> 
> At first, I thought of giving these values to drm_gpuvm_init() through its
> reserve_{offset, range} arguments, but it turns out that is meant for VM
> address spans that are not managed through the usual drm_gpuvm split/merge
> circuit, so storing the end of the user VA range at VM creation time and
> doing a quick check in the vm_bind ioctl path was the simplest workaround.
> 
> Fixes: tag and reference the relevant sparse binding support commit.
> Fixes: 647810ec2476 ("drm/panthor: Add the MMU/VM logical block")
> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
> Signed-off-by: Adrián Larumbe <adrian.larumbe@collabora.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c
> index 31cc57029c12..94789777aac4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c
> @@ -310,6 +310,9 @@ struct panthor_vm {
>  		u64 end;
>  	} kernel_auto_va;
>  
> +	/** @user_va_range: Upper boundary of VAs VM users can map objects against. */
> +	u64 user_va_range;
> +
>  	/** @as: Address space related fields. */
>  	struct {
>  		/**
> @@ -2893,6 +2896,8 @@ panthor_vm_create(struct panthor_device *ptdev, bool for_mcu,
>  		va_range = full_va_range;
>  	}
>  
> +	vm->user_va_range = kernel_va_start;
> +
>  	mutex_init(&vm->mm_lock);
>  	drm_mm_init(&vm->mm, kernel_va_start, kernel_va_size);
>  	vm->kernel_auto_va.start = auto_kernel_va_start;
> @@ -2981,6 +2986,10 @@ panthor_vm_bind_prepare_op_ctx(struct drm_file *file,
>  	if (!IS_ALIGNED(op->va | op->size | op->bo_offset, vm_pgsz))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> +	/* We don't allow mappings that overlap with kbo's reserved range */
> +	if (op->va + op->size > vm->user_va_range)

This can overflow, although you partially handle this case in patch 4.
Can we simply move the overflow check from patch 4 here along with the
user_va_range check?

Thanks,
Steve

> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
>  	switch (op->flags & DRM_PANTHOR_VM_BIND_OP_TYPE_MASK) {
>  	case DRM_PANTHOR_VM_BIND_OP_TYPE_MAP:
>  		if (!(op->flags & DRM_PANTHOR_VM_BIND_OP_MAP_SPARSE)) {
>