dri-devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Prof. Dr. Klaus Kusche" <klaus.kusche@computerix.info>
To: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Feature request] Multiple X servers on one graphics card?
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 16:22:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E38083C.2060407@computerix.info> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADnq5_Puz01iSfhgkjc0_DsFUN5-nHbisf5y0Y9sPRVeFaoXow@mail.gmail.com>

On 2011-08-02 14:59, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Prof. Dr. Klaus Kusche
> <klaus.kusche@computerix.info>  wrote:
>> Hmmm, what's about the opposite approach?
>> To me, it sounds simpler and more logical when the kernel always creates
>> one device node per output (or maybe dynamically per connected output),
>> without any need for configuration or device assignment.
>
> You almost always have more connectors than display controllers (e.g.,
> you might have displayport, svideo, DVI-I and VGA, but only two
> display controllers so you can only use two of the connectors at any
> time).  Also certain combinations of connectors are not possible
> depending on the hw (e.g., the svideo and the VGA port may share the
> same DAC, so you can only use one or the other at the same time).

Hmmm, for my purposes I was only thinking about new, current hardware,
not about previous-generation cards, and only about digital outputs:

* The professional, high-quality solution would be ATI's FirePro 2460:
4 mini Displayports, all active at the same time, single slot
(passive cooling, < 20 W, so that's a great energy saver, too,
competing with thin and zero clients,
and it's silent and long-lived)

* The XFX HD-677X-Z5F3 most likely offers most ports per Euro and space:
5 mini Displayports, all active at the same time, single slot,
for less than 100 Euro

(this would result in 16/20 seats with any quad-crossfire mainboard
and 28/35 seats with some server mainboards if the BIOS is able
to assign addresses to 7 graphics cards)

Even the low-cost 6450 supports 3 and the 6570 supports 4
independent simultaneous outputs, so any ATI 6xxx card can drive
all its outputs at the same time
(and I believe that was also true for ATI 5xxx)
However, cards with 3 or 4 digital outputs are hard to find
in that price range... (XFX HD6570 is one of them)

But you're correct, my suggestion above needs to be refined:
One DRI device per display controller.

Klaus.

-- 
Prof. Dr. Klaus Kusche
Private address: Rainstraße 9/1, 88316 Isny, Germany
+49 7562 6211377 Klaus.Kusche@computerix.info http://www.computerix.info
Office address: NTA Isny gGmbH, Seidenstraße 12-35, 88316 Isny, Germany
+49 7562 9707 36 kusche@nta-isny.de http://www.nta-isny.de

  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-02 14:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-30 18:48 [Feature request] Multiple X servers on one graphics card? Prof. Dr. Klaus Kusche
2011-07-31 20:09 ` Dave Airlie
2011-08-01  8:14   ` Prof. Dr. Klaus Kusche
2011-08-01 19:41   ` Prof. Dr. Klaus Kusche
2011-08-01 19:47     ` Dave Airlie
2011-08-01 20:22       ` Alan Cox
2011-08-02  8:17         ` Prof. Dr. Klaus Kusche
2011-08-02 10:26           ` Alan Cox
2011-08-02 10:28             ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-08-02 11:10               ` Prof. Dr. Klaus Kusche
2011-08-02 15:27                 ` Michel Dänzer
2011-08-02 11:54             ` Prof. Dr. Klaus Kusche
2011-08-02 15:43         ` Christoph Bumiller
2011-08-02 12:59     ` Alex Deucher
2011-08-02 14:22       ` Prof. Dr. Klaus Kusche [this message]
2011-08-02 14:34         ` Alex Deucher
2011-08-02 15:28           ` Prof. Dr. Klaus Kusche
2011-08-02 15:48             ` Alex Deucher
2011-08-02 19:11               ` Prof. Dr. Klaus Kusche
2011-08-03 17:51                 ` Alex Deucher
2011-08-03 19:25                   ` Prof. Dr. Klaus Kusche
2011-08-02 23:31               ` Chi-Thanh Christopher Nguyen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-08-02 13:34 Tomasz Borowik
2011-08-03  6:35 Prof. Dr. Klaus Kusche

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E38083C.2060407@computerix.info \
    --to=klaus.kusche@computerix.info \
    --cc=alexdeucher@gmail.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox