From: Steven Newbury <steve@snewbury.org.uk>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
DRI mailing list <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Barnes, Jesse" <jesse.barnes@intel.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: drm-next i915 regression? ( was: Re: PCI resources above 4GB)
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:19:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F88360E.704@snewbury.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120413141305.GI4525@phenom.ffwll.local>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 13/04/12 15:13, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 03:08:36PM +0100, Steven Newbury wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 13/04/12 14:52, Steven Newbury wrote:
>>> On Fri, 13 Apr 2012, 14:26:19 BST, Steven Newbury
>>> <steve@snewbury.org.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
>>>>
>>>> On 13/04/12 13:49, Steven Newbury wrote:
>>>>> On 13/04/12 12:58, Steven Newbury wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's not stable, crashes soon after GMA comes up.
>>>>>>> (Could be unrelated breakage in linus/master? Probably
>>>>>>> not but I will verify.) I noticed the high
>>>>>>> allocations are occuring from the top of 64-bit
>>>>>>> address-space, whilst /proc/cpuinfo shows only 48 bits
>>>>>>> of virtual addressing. Could that be why..?
>>>>>> To reply to myself again, I should have said crashes
>>>>>> shortly after Xorg initialises using the intel driver, in
>>>>>> both cases! I'm building a kernel now without the patch
>>>>>> set to see if it's unrelated. If it still dies I'll try
>>>>>> applying your patch set to a branch without the changes
>>>>>> from linus/master... (should have done that anyway...)
>>>>>
>>>>> Okay, I instead created a branch from an older 3.4-rc1+
>>>>> kernel tree, running it now, and it seems to be stable.
>>>>> Something perhaps in the newer tree not playing nicely.
>>>>> I'll see if I can bisect it, or at least base of rc2 if
>>>>> that works... (I'm a little wary of crashing the system too
>>>>> much and losing my btrfs filesystem...)
>>>> rc2 is fine as well. Not sure what happened there, I need
>>>> to be more careful about keeping a clean tree to work from.
>>> I'm pretty sure the crash was a from a drm-next regression.
>>> I'll try bisecting it....
>> Sorry, posted too soon! Almost as I clicked on send it froze
>> again (using rc2 + for-pci-res-alloc ). I had problems with the
>> earlier patches re. X/i915 stability. Strange. I'll see if I
>> can track it down.
>
> Please upgrade to the latest version of Linus' upstream git. A few
> fixes for regressions in drm/i915 just landed there for -rc3.
> -Daniel
Okay. I'll try clean latest linus + for-pci-res-alloc. Will report back.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk+INg4ACgkQGcb56gMuC60pJgCfS/g2k3mzIqU34de/Y4wTvfCP
+hwAmQEEdgQ/y0QvDbPffNZ6izqs2Dce
=EGwB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-13 14:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1333968563.5678.19.camel@infinity>
[not found] ` <CAErSpo7hGvJSmq4U37XN9T7ZaYn55fyy9t3ER5BBCDdQ3XZxqw@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <4F84110E.3000400@snewbury.org.uk>
[not found] ` <CAE9FiQVHf_pcXUspOtLXx4XminmzdWja3Ra2Wh5jQRbfNOQ1eQ@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <4F8467AA.90305@snewbury.org.uk>
[not found] ` <CAE9FiQWaop0NE7ZJu6jVW3SnxLkOJ9hRKh4xMNk64XjCAMRMMw@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <4F848357.3060007@snewbury.org.uk>
[not found] ` <CAE9FiQXTgh3X4x+xD1T0ipsEbhbPtctYucfGeuWK=cq7kHeZ1Q@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <4F848E10.1090703@snewbury.org.uk>
[not found] ` <CAE9FiQXvwYrJhLi91VDVtD4+OOfbGQ1U20-Cap+8tBZUt7QCkA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <1334089568.4083.2.camel@Nokia-N900>
[not found] ` <CAE9FiQWnvB2VbBQQaEnDE0nf+Zwy6nyoGrEuVrUesQEzgYfbvA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <4F84A3EC.6030903@snewbury.org.uk>
2012-04-12 0:57 ` PCI resources above 4GB Yinghai Lu
2012-04-12 11:22 ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-12 16:07 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-04-12 16:40 ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-13 8:26 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-04-13 8:34 ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-13 11:45 ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-13 11:58 ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-13 12:49 ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-13 13:26 ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-13 13:52 ` drm-next i915 regression? ( was: Re: PCI resources above 4GB) Steven Newbury
2012-04-13 14:08 ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-13 14:13 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-04-13 14:19 ` Steven Newbury [this message]
2012-04-13 15:23 ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-13 15:49 ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-13 16:17 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-04-13 17:12 ` btrfs oops [was Re: drm-next i915 regression? ( was: Re: PCI resources above 4GB)] Steven Newbury
2012-04-13 17:38 ` drm-next i915 regression? ( was: Re: PCI resources above 4GB) Steven Newbury
2012-04-13 18:12 ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-13 21:51 ` Btrfs corruption Oops " Steven Newbury
2012-04-14 17:37 ` PCI resources above 4GB Steven Newbury
2012-04-14 18:05 ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-14 18:42 ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-14 19:08 ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-14 19:21 ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-14 20:48 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-04-15 10:19 ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-15 10:20 ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-15 11:37 ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-15 17:25 ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-15 17:31 ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-15 20:05 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-04-15 20:06 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-04-16 6:54 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-04-16 7:01 ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-16 17:29 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-04-18 7:21 ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-24 9:49 ` Steven Newbury
[not found] ` <4FB227D3.7090002@snewbury.org.uk>
[not found] ` <CAE9FiQX48eCS85eWMFxm6fCWgu2zwxvSywtQhsf-35WEvBfJVQ@mail.gmail.com>
2012-05-17 12:27 ` Steven Newbury
2012-05-17 12:34 ` Steven Newbury
2012-05-17 16:36 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-05-18 7:45 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-05-18 9:08 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-05-21 17:27 ` Steven Newbury
2012-05-29 23:19 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-06-01 23:06 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-04-15 3:21 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-04-15 10:18 ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-15 11:31 ` Steven Newbury
2012-04-12 16:29 ` Steven Newbury
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F88360E.704@snewbury.org.uk \
--to=steve@snewbury.org.uk \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jesse.barnes@intel.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox