From: Thomas Hellstrom <thomas@shipmail.org>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] drm/vmwgfx: remove use of fence_obj_args
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 09:55:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5088F08D.2020802@shipmail.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <507830D7.1090703@canonical.com>
On 10/12/2012 05:01 PM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> It's always hardcoded to the same value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_buffer.c | 7 ++-----
> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_execbuf.c | 15 ++-------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_resource.c | 4 ----
> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_buffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_buffer.c
> index 9826fbc..da12922 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_buffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_buffer.c
> @@ -318,19 +318,16 @@ static int vmw_sync_obj_flush(void *sync_obj, void *sync_arg)
>
> static bool vmw_sync_obj_signaled(void *sync_obj, void *sync_arg)
> {
> - unsigned long flags = (unsigned long) sync_arg;
> return vmw_fence_obj_signaled((struct vmw_fence_obj *) sync_obj,
> - (uint32_t) flags);
> + DRM_VMW_FENCE_FLAG_EXEC);
>
> }
>
> static int vmw_sync_obj_wait(void *sync_obj, void *sync_arg,
> bool lazy, bool interruptible)
> {
> - unsigned long flags = (unsigned long) sync_arg;
> -
> return vmw_fence_obj_wait((struct vmw_fence_obj *) sync_obj,
> - (uint32_t) flags,
> + DRM_VMW_FENCE_FLAG_EXEC,
> lazy, interruptible,
> VMW_FENCE_WAIT_TIMEOUT);
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_execbuf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_execbuf.c
> index 30654b4..e5775a0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_execbuf.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_execbuf.c
> @@ -71,7 +71,6 @@ static void vmw_resource_to_validate_list(struct vmw_sw_context *sw_context,
> */
> static int vmw_bo_to_validate_list(struct vmw_sw_context *sw_context,
> struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
> - uint32_t fence_flags,
> uint32_t *p_val_node)
> {
> uint32_t val_node;
> @@ -87,15 +86,12 @@ static int vmw_bo_to_validate_list(struct vmw_sw_context *sw_context,
>
> val_buf = &sw_context->val_bufs[val_node];
> if (unlikely(val_node == sw_context->cur_val_buf)) {
> - val_buf->new_sync_obj_arg = NULL;
> val_buf->bo = ttm_bo_reference(bo);
> list_add_tail(&val_buf->head, &sw_context->validate_nodes);
> ++sw_context->cur_val_buf;
> }
>
> - val_buf->new_sync_obj_arg = (void *)
> - ((unsigned long) val_buf->new_sync_obj_arg | fence_flags);
> - sw_context->fence_flags |= fence_flags;
> + sw_context->fence_flags |= DRM_VMW_FENCE_FLAG_EXEC;
>
> if (p_val_node)
> *p_val_node = val_node;
> @@ -313,7 +309,6 @@ static int vmw_query_bo_switch_prepare(struct vmw_private *dev_priv,
> cid_to_add = sw_context->cur_query_cid;
> ret = vmw_bo_to_validate_list(sw_context,
> sw_context->cur_query_bo,
> - DRM_VMW_FENCE_FLAG_EXEC,
> NULL);
> if (unlikely(ret != 0))
> return ret;
> @@ -322,7 +317,6 @@ static int vmw_query_bo_switch_prepare(struct vmw_private *dev_priv,
>
> ret = vmw_bo_to_validate_list(sw_context,
> dev_priv->dummy_query_bo,
> - DRM_VMW_FENCE_FLAG_EXEC,
> NULL);
> if (unlikely(ret != 0))
> return ret;
> @@ -346,7 +340,6 @@ static int vmw_query_bo_switch_prepare(struct vmw_private *dev_priv,
> &sw_context->query_list);
> ret = vmw_bo_to_validate_list(sw_context,
> dev_priv->dummy_query_bo,
> - DRM_VMW_FENCE_FLAG_EXEC,
> NULL);
> if (unlikely(ret != 0))
> return ret;
> @@ -465,8 +458,7 @@ static int vmw_translate_guest_ptr(struct vmw_private *dev_priv,
> reloc = &sw_context->relocs[sw_context->cur_reloc++];
> reloc->location = ptr;
>
> - ret = vmw_bo_to_validate_list(sw_context, bo, DRM_VMW_FENCE_FLAG_EXEC,
> - &reloc->index);
> + ret = vmw_bo_to_validate_list(sw_context, bo, &reloc->index);
> if (unlikely(ret != 0))
> goto out_no_reloc;
>
> @@ -1290,12 +1282,9 @@ void vmw_execbuf_release_pinned_bo(struct vmw_private *dev_priv,
>
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&validate_list);
>
> - pinned_val.new_sync_obj_arg = (void *)(unsigned long)
> - DRM_VMW_FENCE_FLAG_EXEC;
> pinned_val.bo = ttm_bo_reference(dev_priv->pinned_bo);
> list_add_tail(&pinned_val.head, &validate_list);
>
> - query_val.new_sync_obj_arg = pinned_val.new_sync_obj_arg;
> query_val.bo = ttm_bo_reference(dev_priv->dummy_query_bo);
> list_add_tail(&query_val.head, &validate_list);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_resource.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_resource.c
> index da3c6b5..0ca3e1c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_resource.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_resource.c
> @@ -833,8 +833,6 @@ int vmw_surface_do_validate(struct vmw_private *dev_priv,
> if (srf->backup) {
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&val_list);
> val_buf.bo = ttm_bo_reference(srf->backup);
> - val_buf.new_sync_obj_arg = (void *)((unsigned long)
> - DRM_VMW_FENCE_FLAG_EXEC);
> list_add_tail(&val_buf.head, &val_list);
> ret = ttm_eu_reserve_buffers(&val_list);
> if (unlikely(ret != 0))
> @@ -966,8 +964,6 @@ int vmw_surface_evict(struct vmw_private *dev_priv,
>
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&val_list);
> val_buf.bo = ttm_bo_reference(srf->backup);
> - val_buf.new_sync_obj_arg = (void *)(unsigned long)
> - DRM_VMW_FENCE_FLAG_EXEC;
> list_add_tail(&val_buf.head, &val_list);
> ret = ttm_eu_reserve_buffers(&val_list);
> if (unlikely(ret != 0))
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
For the series:
Reviewed-By: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-25 7:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-12 15:01 [PATCH 1/4] drm/vmwgfx: remove use of fence_obj_args Maarten Lankhorst
2012-10-25 7:55 ` Thomas Hellstrom [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5088F08D.2020802@shipmail.org \
--to=thomas@shipmail.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).