dri-devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/ttm: do not check if list is empty in ttm_bo_force_list_clean, v2
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 12:55:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50B89E9E.8070904@vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50B88790.6010208@canonical.com>

On 11/30/2012 11:16 AM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 30-11-12 10:04, Thomas Hellstrom schreef:
>> On 11/30/2012 09:05 AM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>>> Just use the return error from ttm_mem_evict_first instead.
>>>
>>> Changes since v1:
>>> - Add warning if list is not empty, nothing else we can do here.
>> Marten, when this function is called, all cross-device reservers have been shut out with the TTM lock or whatever similar
>> mechanism is in place. It's a critical function that must succeed, unless there is a hardware failure to evict.
>>
>> As mentioned in the comments on the previous patch, ttm_bo_evict_first() may return 0 (OK) if it failed to reclaim the
>> trylock in cleanup_refs_and_unlock(), with the assumption that another process will destroy the bo anyway
>> (possibly at a later time which we know nothing about). The lru list needs to be empty when this function returns.
>>
>> This means we must either keep the while(list_empty) or perhaps better, retry instead of WARN if list_empty() is detected at the end of list.
> As long as evict_first returns 0, that function is called over and over again

Ah, ok. You're right.

Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellstrom<thellstrom@vmware.com>

      reply	other threads:[~2012-11-30 11:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-30  8:05 [PATCH] drm/ttm: do not check if list is empty in ttm_bo_force_list_clean, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2012-11-30  9:04 ` Thomas Hellstrom
2012-11-30 10:16   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2012-11-30 11:55     ` Thomas Hellstrom [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50B89E9E.8070904@vmware.com \
    --to=thellstrom@vmware.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox