* Re: -next: no resume from suspend
[not found] ` <16191961.j5ydKsJ3d3@vostro.rjw.lan>
@ 2013-01-14 12:53 ` Jiri Slaby
2013-01-16 9:20 ` Jani Nikula
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Slaby @ 2013-01-14 12:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: daniel.vetter, LKML, dri-devel, Linux PM mailing list
On 01/14/2013 01:56 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, January 14, 2013 11:11:52 AM Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> since friday's -next (the last known to be working is the last monday's)
>> I cannot resume from suspend. The last thing I see with
>> no_console_suspend is:
>> i915: No ACPI video bus found
>>
>> But I used to see the message always, so this is no difference. Any idea
>> before I start bisecting?
>
> Well, what's the next message you normally see with no_console_suspend?
[drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20080730 for 0000:00:02.0 on minor 0
Adding DRM and intel guys.
--
js
suse labs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: -next: no resume from suspend
2013-01-14 12:53 ` -next: no resume from suspend Jiri Slaby
@ 2013-01-16 9:20 ` Jani Nikula
2013-01-16 10:36 ` Jiri Slaby
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2013-01-16 9:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jiri Slaby, Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: daniel.vetter, LKML, dri-devel, Linux PM mailing list
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> wrote:
> On 01/14/2013 01:56 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Monday, January 14, 2013 11:11:52 AM Jiri Slaby wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> since friday's -next (the last known to be working is the last monday's)
>>> I cannot resume from suspend. The last thing I see with
>>> no_console_suspend is:
>>> i915: No ACPI video bus found
>>>
>>> But I used to see the message always, so this is no difference. Any idea
>>> before I start bisecting?
>>
>> Well, what's the next message you normally see with no_console_suspend?
>
> [drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20080730 for 0000:00:02.0 on minor 0
>
> Adding DRM and intel guys.
Hi Jiri, the dmesgs for both cases with drm.debug=0xe module param might
give us some clues.
Does it work without no_console_suspend?
BR,
Jani.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: -next: no resume from suspend
2013-01-16 9:20 ` Jani Nikula
@ 2013-01-16 10:36 ` Jiri Slaby
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Slaby @ 2013-01-16 10:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jani Nikula
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, daniel.vetter, LKML, dri-devel,
Linux PM mailing list
On 01/16/2013 10:20 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Hi Jiri, the dmesgs for both cases with drm.debug=0xe module param might
> give us some clues.
>
> Does it work without no_console_suspend?
Hi, no, it does not work either way. But what I found out with debug
enabled, that it's a completely different problem: in ACPI. The kernel
is spinning acpi_rs_get_aml_length. I'll report details without CCing
DRM people.
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-01-16 10:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <50F3D9E8.6040802@suse.cz>
[not found] ` <16191961.j5ydKsJ3d3@vostro.rjw.lan>
2013-01-14 12:53 ` -next: no resume from suspend Jiri Slaby
2013-01-16 9:20 ` Jani Nikula
2013-01-16 10:36 ` Jiri Slaby
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).