* Re: -next: no resume from suspend [not found] ` <16191961.j5ydKsJ3d3@vostro.rjw.lan> @ 2013-01-14 12:53 ` Jiri Slaby 2013-01-16 9:20 ` Jani Nikula 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Jiri Slaby @ 2013-01-14 12:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: daniel.vetter, LKML, dri-devel, Linux PM mailing list On 01/14/2013 01:56 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, January 14, 2013 11:11:52 AM Jiri Slaby wrote: >> Hi, >> >> since friday's -next (the last known to be working is the last monday's) >> I cannot resume from suspend. The last thing I see with >> no_console_suspend is: >> i915: No ACPI video bus found >> >> But I used to see the message always, so this is no difference. Any idea >> before I start bisecting? > > Well, what's the next message you normally see with no_console_suspend? [drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20080730 for 0000:00:02.0 on minor 0 Adding DRM and intel guys. -- js suse labs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: -next: no resume from suspend 2013-01-14 12:53 ` -next: no resume from suspend Jiri Slaby @ 2013-01-16 9:20 ` Jani Nikula 2013-01-16 10:36 ` Jiri Slaby 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Jani Nikula @ 2013-01-16 9:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jiri Slaby, Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: daniel.vetter, LKML, dri-devel, Linux PM mailing list On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> wrote: > On 01/14/2013 01:56 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Monday, January 14, 2013 11:11:52 AM Jiri Slaby wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> since friday's -next (the last known to be working is the last monday's) >>> I cannot resume from suspend. The last thing I see with >>> no_console_suspend is: >>> i915: No ACPI video bus found >>> >>> But I used to see the message always, so this is no difference. Any idea >>> before I start bisecting? >> >> Well, what's the next message you normally see with no_console_suspend? > > [drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20080730 for 0000:00:02.0 on minor 0 > > Adding DRM and intel guys. Hi Jiri, the dmesgs for both cases with drm.debug=0xe module param might give us some clues. Does it work without no_console_suspend? BR, Jani. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: -next: no resume from suspend 2013-01-16 9:20 ` Jani Nikula @ 2013-01-16 10:36 ` Jiri Slaby 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Jiri Slaby @ 2013-01-16 10:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jani Nikula Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, daniel.vetter, LKML, dri-devel, Linux PM mailing list On 01/16/2013 10:20 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: > Hi Jiri, the dmesgs for both cases with drm.debug=0xe module param might > give us some clues. > > Does it work without no_console_suspend? Hi, no, it does not work either way. But what I found out with debug enabled, that it's a completely different problem: in ACPI. The kernel is spinning acpi_rs_get_aml_length. I'll report details without CCing DRM people. thanks, -- js suse labs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-01-16 10:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <50F3D9E8.6040802@suse.cz>
[not found] ` <16191961.j5ydKsJ3d3@vostro.rjw.lan>
2013-01-14 12:53 ` -next: no resume from suspend Jiri Slaby
2013-01-16 9:20 ` Jani Nikula
2013-01-16 10:36 ` Jiri Slaby
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).