From: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
To: "Boris Brezillon" <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>,
"Liviu Dudau" <liviu.dudau@arm.com>,
"Adrián Larumbe" <adrian.larumbe@collabora.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Florent Tomasin <florent.tomasin@arm.com>,
Heinrich Fink <hfink@snap.com>,
kernel@collabora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 6/8] drm/panthor: Fix the logic that decides when to stop ticking
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2025 16:29:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50a6bd19-d8a7-4db5-b7c2-c4f0f52b6372@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251106144656.1012274-7-boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
On 06/11/2025 14:46, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> When we have multiple active groups with the same priority, we need to
> keep ticking for the priority rotation to take place. If we don't do
> that, we might starve slots with lower priorities.
>
> It's annoying to deal with that in tick_ctx_update_resched_target(),
> so let's add a ::stop_tick field to the tick context which is
> initialized to true, and downgraded to false as soon as we detect
> something that requires to tick to happen. This way we can complement
> the current logic with extra conditions if needed.
>
> Fixes: de8548813824 ("drm/panthor: Add the scheduler logical block")
> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_sched.c | 36 ++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_sched.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_sched.c
> index 1eba56e7360d..7b164228af7b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_sched.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_sched.c
> @@ -1882,6 +1882,7 @@ struct panthor_sched_tick_ctx {
> struct panthor_vm *vms[MAX_CS_PER_CSG];
> u32 as_count;
> bool immediate_tick;
> + bool stop_tick;
> u32 csg_upd_failed_mask;
> };
>
> @@ -1941,10 +1942,17 @@ tick_ctx_pick_groups_from_list(const struct panthor_scheduler *sched,
> if (!owned_by_tick_ctx)
> group_get(group);
>
> - list_move_tail(&group->run_node, &ctx->groups[group->priority]);
> ctx->group_count++;
> +
> + /* If we have more than one active group with the same priority,
> + * we need to keep ticking to rotate the CSG priority.
> + */
> if (group_is_idle(group))
> ctx->idle_group_count++;
> + else if (!list_empty(&ctx->groups[group->priority]))
> + ctx->stop_tick = false;
> +
> + list_move_tail(&group->run_node, &ctx->groups[group->priority]);
>
> if (i == ctx->as_count)
> ctx->vms[ctx->as_count++] = group->vm;
> @@ -1996,6 +2004,7 @@ tick_ctx_init(struct panthor_scheduler *sched,
> memset(ctx, 0, sizeof(*ctx));
> csgs_upd_ctx_init(&upd_ctx);
>
> + ctx->stop_tick = true;
> ctx->min_priority = PANTHOR_CSG_PRIORITY_COUNT;
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ctx->groups); i++) {
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ctx->groups[i]);
> @@ -2308,32 +2317,21 @@ static u64
> tick_ctx_update_resched_target(struct panthor_scheduler *sched,
> const struct panthor_sched_tick_ctx *ctx)
> {
> - /* We had space left, no need to reschedule until some external event happens. */
> - if (!tick_ctx_is_full(sched, ctx))
> - goto no_tick;
> + u64 resched_target;
>
> - /* If idle groups were scheduled, no need to wake up until some external
> - * event happens (group unblocked, new job submitted, ...).
> - */
> - if (ctx->idle_group_count)
> + if (ctx->stop_tick)
> goto no_tick;
>
> if (drm_WARN_ON(&sched->ptdev->base, ctx->min_priority >= PANTHOR_CSG_PRIORITY_COUNT))
> goto no_tick;
>
> - /* If there are groups of the same priority waiting, we need to
> - * keep the scheduler ticking, otherwise, we'll just wait for
> - * new groups with higher priority to be queued.
> - */
> - if (!list_empty(&sched->groups.runnable[ctx->min_priority])) {
> - u64 resched_target = sched->last_tick + sched->tick_period;
> + resched_target = sched->last_tick + sched->tick_period;
>
> - if (time_before64(sched->resched_target, sched->last_tick) ||
> - time_before64(resched_target, sched->resched_target))
> - sched->resched_target = resched_target;
> + if (time_before64(sched->resched_target, sched->last_tick) ||
> + time_before64(resched_target, sched->resched_target))
> + sched->resched_target = resched_target;
>
> - return sched->resched_target - sched->last_tick;
> - }
> + return sched->resched_target - sched->last_tick;
>
> no_tick:
> sched->resched_target = U64_MAX;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-06 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-06 14:46 [PATCH v1 0/8] drm/panthor: Misc scheduler fixes Boris Brezillon
2025-11-06 14:46 ` [PATCH v1 1/8] drm/panthor: Simplify group idleness tracking Boris Brezillon
2025-11-06 16:15 ` Steven Price
2025-11-06 14:46 ` [PATCH v1 2/8] drm/panthor: Don't try to enable extract events Boris Brezillon
2025-11-06 16:17 ` Steven Price
2025-11-06 14:46 ` [PATCH v1 3/8] drm/panthor: Fix the group priority rotation logic Boris Brezillon
2025-11-06 16:18 ` Steven Price
2025-11-06 16:30 ` Boris Brezillon
2025-11-06 14:46 ` [PATCH v1 4/8] drm/panthor: Fix the full_tick check Boris Brezillon
2025-11-06 16:20 ` Steven Price
2025-11-06 14:46 ` [PATCH v1 5/8] drm/panthor: Fix immediate ticking on a disabled tick Boris Brezillon
2025-11-06 16:23 ` Steven Price
2025-11-06 16:33 ` Boris Brezillon
2025-11-06 14:46 ` [PATCH v1 6/8] drm/panthor: Fix the logic that decides when to stop ticking Boris Brezillon
2025-11-06 16:29 ` Steven Price [this message]
2025-11-06 14:46 ` [PATCH v1 7/8] drm/panthor: Make sure we resume the tick when new jobs are submitted Boris Brezillon
2025-11-06 16:39 ` Steven Price
2025-11-06 14:46 ` [PATCH v1 8/8] drm/panthor: Kill panthor_sched_immediate_tick() Boris Brezillon
2025-11-06 16:44 ` Steven Price
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50a6bd19-d8a7-4db5-b7c2-c4f0f52b6372@arm.com \
--to=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=adrian.larumbe@collabora.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=florent.tomasin@arm.com \
--cc=hfink@snap.com \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox