From: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, michal.wajdeczko@intel.com,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Use drm_dev_unplug()
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2019 10:11:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51c51c4d1a2facbc1dfb240b94377027e263872e.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <155445007634.8259.18397004914881394541@skylake-alporthouse-com>
On Fri, 2019-04-05 at 08:41 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Janusz Krzysztofik (2019-04-05 08:26:57)
> > From: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@intel.com>
> >
> > The driver does not currently support unbinding from a device which
> > is
> > in use. Since open file descriptors may still be pointing into
> > kernel
> > memory where the device structures used to be, entirely correct
> > kernel
> > panics protect the driver from being unbound as we should not be
> > unbinding it before those dangling pointers have been made safe.
> >
> > According to the documentation found inside
> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c,
> > drm_dev_unplug() should be used instead of drm_dev_unregister() in
> > order to make a device inaccessible to users as soon as it is
> > unpluged.
> > Follow that advice to make those possibly dangling pointers safe,
> > protected by DRM layer from a user who is otherwise left pointing
> > into
> > possibly reused kernel memory after the driver has been unbound
> > from
> > the device.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > index 9df65d386d11..66163378c481 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > @@ -1596,7 +1596,7 @@ static void i915_driver_unregister(struct
> > drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > i915_pmu_unregister(dev_priv);
> >
> > i915_teardown_sysfs(dev_priv);
> > - drm_dev_unregister(&dev_priv->drm);
> > + drm_dev_unplug(&dev_priv->drm);
>
> I think we may have our onion inverted here. We want to stop the
> users
> as the first step, then start removing the entries. (That will also
> nicely invert the order from register, which is what we typically
> expect).
>
> After calling i915_driver_unregister(); call i915_gem_set_wedged() to
> immediately (give or take external fences) cancel inflight
> operations.
OK, thanks. Do you prefer them squashed or as serparate patches?
Thanks,
Janusz
> -Chris
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-05 8:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-05 7:26 [PATCH] drm/i915: Use drm_dev_unplug() Janusz Krzysztofik
2019-04-05 7:41 ` Chris Wilson
2019-04-05 8:11 ` Janusz Krzysztofik [this message]
2019-04-05 8:24 ` Chris Wilson
2019-04-05 11:38 ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2019-04-15 9:29 ` Daniel Vetter
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-04-05 13:02 [PATCH 0/2] Stop users from using the device on driver unbind Janusz Krzysztofik
2019-04-05 13:02 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Use drm_dev_unplug() Janusz Krzysztofik
2019-04-15 9:32 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-04-18 14:51 ` [PATCH v2 0/1] Stop users from using the device on driver unbind Janusz Krzysztofik
2019-04-18 14:51 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] drm/i915: Use drm_dev_unplug() Janusz Krzysztofik
2019-04-05 13:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Mark GEM wedged right after marking device unplugged Janusz Krzysztofik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51c51c4d1a2facbc1dfb240b94377027e263872e.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).