From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Liu Ying Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] refactor some ldb related clocks Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 12:12:19 +0800 Message-ID: <52143E23.9080203@freescale.com> References: <1376987932-5540-1-git-send-email-Ying.Liu@freescale.com> <1376991823.4000.22.camel@pizza.hi.pengutronix.de> <52134030.4030502@freescale.com> <20130821015939.GD30533@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130821015939.GD30533@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Shawn Guo Cc: Philipp Zabel , kernel@pengutronix.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org On 08/21/2013 09:59 AM, Shawn Guo wrote: > Hi Ying, > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 06:08:48PM +0800, Liu Ying wrote: >>> While I admit to having introduced the combination of 1/3.5 fixed >>> divider and configurable 1/1,1/2 divder clocks to describe this >>> fractional divider for the reasons you state, I think the correct >>> solution would be to improve the table divider to support fractional >>> values and get rid of the virtual ldb_di_div_3_5 clocks, not >>> introduce more virtual clocks. >> >> Yes, it's good to support fractional values for the table divider(not sure if there is any plan for this). >> I see there is something similar in 'include/linux/sh_clk.h'. > > Yeah, I agree with Philipp on improving table divider to support > fractional values. Would you like to work on that? > > Shawn > I don't have a plan to work on that now. Liu Ying