From: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zboszor@pr.hu>
To: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
Cc: Maling list - DRI developers <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: DPM on Radeon HD6570
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 19:49:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5214FDC1.8010400@pr.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADnq5_Px5G1qCY3obgJ=DB+bZA+HuHNE91UuqVkp63Ja8fDPbQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
thanks for your response.
2013-08-21 17:39 keltezéssel, Alex Deucher írta:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Boszormenyi Zoltan <zboszor@pr.hu> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I read this Phoronix article:
>> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=amd_hd6000_dpm&num=1
>>
>> Congrats to the progress achieved so far.
>>
>> However, I can see an interesting deviation for HD6570 from the
>> observed trend of other chips.
>>
>> r600g can reach 80+ percent of the performance of Catalyst
>> for most HD6xxx chips except for 6570, where the performance
>> is around 10-20 percent.
>>
>> Do you have a theory about this difference?
>> Maybe DPM doesn't work as intended on HD6570?
>>
> Are you seeing the same results on your board? If so are the results
> roughly the same with dpm enabled vs. disabled? If so I doubt there
> is a problem with dpm. On older dGPUs like this one dpm won't really
> improve performance since the cards come up with relatively high
> clocks by default. It's mainly for saving power when the GPU is idle.
I have enabled dpm:
$ cat /proc/cmdline
BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-3.11.0-0.rc6.git0.1.fc20.x86_64
root=UUID=00df37a2-be3d-46fe-963a-ca08977fc5f6 ro quiet rhgb radeon.audio=1 radeon.dpm=1
LANG=hu_HU.UTF-8
I have just tried "openarena 0.8.5" again with forced "low" performance.
Results is 26.87fps with low performance, 59.40-59.70fps with forced high
performance.
>
>> I have this kind of video card, so I wanted to test it myself.
>> The exact model of my card is:
>> http://www.sapphiretech.com/presentation/product/?cid=1&gid=3&sgid=1087&pid=1176&psn=&lid=1&leg=0#
>>
> Note that a lot of 6570 cards, including yours use DD3 memory rather
> than GDDR5 so they will have fairly limited memory bandwidth.
I know. The 6570 tested by Phoronix must be GDDR5
but it's not mentioned specifically.
Best regards,
Zoltán Böszörményi
>
> Alex
>
>> I have installed kernel 3.11-rc6 on Fedora 19 using this koji kernel:
>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=457463
>>
>> I haven't tested Catalyst but my r600g results mostly match
>> the ones in the article even with a different CPU.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Zoltán Böszörményi
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dri-devel mailing list
>> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-21 17:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-21 14:31 DPM on Radeon HD6570 Boszormenyi Zoltan
2013-08-21 15:39 ` Alex Deucher
2013-08-21 17:49 ` Boszormenyi Zoltan [this message]
2013-08-21 17:55 ` Alex Deucher
2013-08-21 19:05 ` Boszormenyi Zoltan
2013-08-21 16:30 ` Grigori Goronzy
2013-08-21 17:56 ` Boszormenyi Zoltan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5214FDC1.8010400@pr.hu \
--to=zboszor@pr.hu \
--cc=alexdeucher@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox