From: Archit Taneja <archit@ti.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: Synchronization between a crtc mode_set and page_flip?
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 12:51:12 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <533E5D68.6040008@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140403212459.GR7225@phenom.ffwll.local>
On Friday 04 April 2014 02:54 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 02:28:32PM +0530, Archit Taneja wrote:
>> On Wednesday 02 April 2014 06:41 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 5:52 AM, Archit Taneja <archit@ti.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I was trying to figure out how we are supposed to manage synchronization
>>>> between a mode_set and a page_flip called on a crtc.
>>>>
>>>> Say, if a mode_set is immediately followed by a page_flip. The driver can't
>>>> process the page_flip straight away since the hardware is still completing
>>>> the mode_set.
>>>
>>> I guess setcrtc is expected to be synchronous(ish).. so a lot of
>>> userspace won't expect the first pageflip to fail with -EBUSY.
>>
>> Okay, thanks. I guess having setcrtc synchronous isn't that bad.
>
> Yeah, atm I think the rules are that pageflip can only return -EBUSY if
> there's still a pageflip ongoing. Everything else is presumed to be at
> least implicitly ordered, so if your hw can do async modesets then you
> need to synchronize. Also if there's still a pageflip outstanding you need
> to wait for that to complete in your set_config callback first (usually in
> the set_base or the crtc->disable/prepare hooks when using the crtc
> helpers).
Thanks for the info. I didn't realize that the prepare/commit hooks get
executed when using drm_crtc_helper_set_mode() for the set_config helper.
Rob,
We disable the crtc in prepare, and enable it in commit.
If setcrtc changes the mode, I don't see how apply worker can execute
prepare() -> mode_set() -> commit() hooks in a row for the crtc
drm_crtc_helper_set_mode(). We can't queue more than one 'apply' of the
same entity. So the latter queues are bound to get rejected, I see
omap_crtc_apply() bailing out for crtc's apply in this case.
I guess making prepare() and mode_set() wait for a vsync should fix
this. Or, combining mode_set and commit as a single queue to apply
should work too. Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Archit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-04 7:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-02 9:52 Synchronization between a crtc mode_set and page_flip? Archit Taneja
2014-04-02 13:11 ` Rob Clark
2014-04-03 8:58 ` Archit Taneja
2014-04-03 21:24 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-04-04 7:21 ` Archit Taneja [this message]
2014-04-04 11:54 ` Rob Clark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=533E5D68.6040008@ti.com \
--to=archit@ti.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox