From: "Terje Bergström" <tbergstrom-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>,
"dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org"
<dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Stephen Warren <swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] gpu: host1x: handle the correct # of syncpt regs
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 11:47:08 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5342660C.3050703@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140407084124.GC25718@ulmo>
On 07.04.2014 11:41, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 11:34:22AM +0300, Terje Bergström wrote:
>> On 07.04.2014 11:18, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>> If I understand correctly there's no immediate need for this to go to
>>> stable kernels, nor for it to be queued for 3.15, right? That is the
>>> potential extra write isn't causing any harm on actual hardware, is it?
>>>
>>> In that case I'll queue this up for 3.16.
>>
>> The reads and writes would get ignored on 32-bit kernel. The change does
>> fix sync point behavior in 64-bit kernel, so it is fixing a real issue.
>
> Okay, but given that we don't support any 64 bit Tegra hardware upstream
> yet, 3.16 would still be enough, wouldn't it?
Sure, sounds good.
Terje
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-07 8:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-04 22:31 [PATCH V2] gpu: host1x: handle the correct # of syncpt regs Stephen Warren
2014-04-07 8:32 ` Terje Bergström
[not found] ` <1396650665-6992-1-git-send-email-swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-07 8:18 ` Thierry Reding
2014-04-07 8:34 ` Terje Bergström
[not found] ` <5342630E.90908-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-07 8:41 ` Thierry Reding
2014-04-07 8:47 ` Terje Bergström [this message]
2014-04-07 15:39 ` Stephen Warren
2014-04-14 20:53 ` Stephen Warren
2014-04-14 21:13 ` Thierry Reding
2014-04-22 7:15 ` Thierry Reding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5342660C.3050703@nvidia.com \
--to=tbergstrom-ddmlm1+adcrqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org \
--cc=swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox