From: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
To: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Cc: Ajay Kumar <ajaykumar.rs@samsung.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, joshi@samsung.com,
ajaynumb@gmail.com, prashanth.g@samsung.com,
Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>,
seanpaul@chromium.org, daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
Subject: Re: [RFC V2 0/3] drm/bridge: panel and chaining
Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 16:44:36 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <536B35E4.10705@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <536B26FC.507@samsung.com>
Just re-sending with text mode. Sorry for this.
On 2014년 05월 08일 15:41, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> On 05/05/2014 09:52 PM, Ajay Kumar wrote:
>> This patchset is based on exynos-drm-next-todo branch of Inki Dae's tree at:
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/daeinki/drm-exynos.git
>>
>> I have just put up Rob's and Sean's idea of chaining up the bridges
>> in code, and have implemented basic panel controls as a chained bridge.
>> This works well with ptn3460 bridge chip on exynos5250-snow board.
>>
>> Still need to make use of standard list calls and figure out proper way
>> of deleting the bridge chain. So, this is just a rough version.
>
> As I understand this patchset tries to solve two things:
> 1. Implement panel as drm_bridge, to ease support for hardware chains:
> Crtc -> Encoder -> Bridge -> Panel
> 2. Add support to drm_bridge chaining, to allow software chains:
> drm_crtc -> drm_encoder -> drm_bridge -> drm_bridge,panel
>
> It is done using Russian doll schema, ops from the bridge calls the same
> ops from the next bridge and the next bridge ops can do the same.
>
> This schema means that all the bridges including the last one are seen
> from the drm core point of view as a one big drm_bridge. Additionally in
> this particular case, the first bridge (ptn3460) implements connector
> so it is hard to guess what is the location of the 2nd bridge in video
> stream chain, sometimes it is after the connector, sometimes before.
> All this is quite confusing.
>
> But if you look at the bridge from upstream video interface point of
> view it is just a panel, edp panel in case of ptn3460, ie ptn3460 on its
> video input side acts as a panel. On the output side it expects a panel,
> lvds panel in this case.
>
> So why not implement ptn3460 bridge as drm_panel which internally uses
> another drm_panel. With this approach everything fits much better.
> You do not need those (pre|post)_(enable|disable) calls, you do not need
> to implement connector in the bridge and you have a driver following
> linux driver model. And no single bit changed in drm core.
>
> I have implemented this way DSI/LVDS bridge, it was sent as RFC [1][2].
> It was not accepted as Inki preferred drm_bridge but as I see the
Yes, in above email threads, I disagreed to using drm_panel framework
for bridge device, especially, to implement connector/encoder to crtc
driver.
However, I thought that it'd be more generic way that lvds drivers use
driver-model, and the use of drm_panel infrastructure would be suitable
to doing this.
So my intention in turn, was that LVDS driver uses integrated drm_bridge
based on drm_panel infrastructure[1], and RFC patch[2] for it. This way
is same as your proposal in the point that LVDS and Panel drivers use
driver-model. The only different point is that LVDS driver has some ops
specific to LVDS device, not using existing ops of drm_panel commonly:
we may need to consider the characteristic of LVDS device.
[1]:http://www.spinics.net/lists/dri-devel/msg55555.html
[2]:http://www.spinics.net/lists/dri-devel/msg55658.html
Thanks,
Inki Dae
> problems with drm_bridges I have decide to attract attention to much
> more cleaner solution.
>
> [1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.devicetree/61559
> [2]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/27044
>
> Regards
> Andrzej
>
>
>>
>> Ajay Kumar (3):
>> [RFC V2 1/3] drm: implement chaining of drm bridges
>> [RFC V2 2/3] drm/bridge: add a dummy panel driver to support lvds bridges
>> [RFC V2 3/3] drm/bridge: ptn3460: support bridge chaining
>>
>> .../bindings/drm/bridge/bridge_panel.txt | 45 ++++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Kconfig | 6 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/bridge_panel.c | 240 +++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ptn3460.c | 21 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c | 13 +-
>> include/drm/bridge/bridge_panel.h | 37 ++++
>> include/drm/drm_crtc.h | 2 +
>> 8 files changed, 360 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/drm/bridge/bridge_panel.txt
>> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/bridge_panel.c
>> create mode 100644 include/drm/bridge/bridge_panel.h
>>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-08 7:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-05 19:52 [RFC V2 0/3] drm/bridge: panel and chaining Ajay Kumar
2014-05-05 19:52 ` [RFC V2 1/3] drm: implement chaining of drm bridges Ajay Kumar
2014-05-06 15:55 ` Sean Paul
2014-05-06 16:12 ` Rob Clark
2014-05-06 19:51 ` Ajay kumar
2014-05-06 19:45 ` Ajay kumar
2014-05-06 20:03 ` Sean Paul
2014-05-06 20:45 ` Ajay kumar
2014-05-05 19:52 ` [RFC V2 2/3] drm/bridge: add a dummy panel driver to support lvds bridges Ajay Kumar
2014-05-05 19:52 ` [RFC V2 3/3] drm/bridge: ptn3460: support bridge chaining Ajay Kumar
2014-05-06 15:54 ` Sean Paul
2014-05-06 20:03 ` Ajay kumar
2014-05-06 20:05 ` Sean Paul
2014-05-08 6:41 ` [RFC V2 0/3] drm/bridge: panel and chaining Andrzej Hajda
2014-05-08 7:31 ` Inki Dae
2014-05-08 7:44 ` Inki Dae [this message]
2014-05-08 10:52 ` Ajay kumar
2014-05-08 11:57 ` Inki Dae
2014-05-08 18:28 ` Rob Clark
2014-05-15 9:49 ` Thierry Reding
2014-05-08 10:26 ` Ajay kumar
2014-05-08 12:59 ` Andrzej Hajda
2014-05-08 16:37 ` Ajay kumar
2014-05-08 18:24 ` Rob Clark
2014-05-09 9:08 ` Andrzej Hajda
2014-05-09 13:59 ` Rob Clark
2014-05-09 15:05 ` Ajay kumar
2014-05-12 7:06 ` Andrzej Hajda
2014-05-12 12:45 ` Rob Clark
2014-05-13 11:09 ` Andrzej Hajda
2014-05-12 16:00 ` Sean Paul
2014-05-13 12:39 ` Andrzej Hajda
2014-05-15 10:32 ` Thierry Reding
2014-05-15 12:34 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-05-15 14:51 ` Ajay kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=536B35E4.10705@samsung.com \
--to=inki.dae@samsung.com \
--cc=a.hajda@samsung.com \
--cc=ajaykumar.rs@samsung.com \
--cc=ajaynumb@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=joshi@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=prashanth.g@samsung.com \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=seanpaul@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox