From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Emil Velikov Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Upstreaming the Android build and misc fixes Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 03:48:53 +0100 Message-ID: <53D5BA15.1020304@gmail.com> References: <1406485557-10638-1-git-send-email-emil.l.velikov@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-we0-f172.google.com (mail-we0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5ECA6E29F for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 19:49:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-we0-f172.google.com with SMTP id x48so6742354wes.3 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 19:49:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1406485557-10638-1-git-send-email-emil.l.velikov@gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" To: "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" Cc: emil.l.velikov@gmail.com List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org A few updates: - Naming the headers lists *_HEADERS caused autohell to hate us. Renamed to *_H_FILES - Including the platform Android.mk files individually is not the right way to do. One needs to construct an array/list of Android.mks and include it. - The series including the above fixes can be found in branch fixes+android over at https://github.com/evelikov/libdrm. -Emil On 27/07/14 19:25, Emil Velikov wrote: > Hello list, > > Recently I've had a go at the Anroid builds and I felt ... inspired that > there are (at least) two downstream repositories that have the relevant > Android build, yet all of them use 6+month old libdrm. > Making even builds a pain in the neck :'( > > Are there any objections if we get the android build upstream ? AFAICS > it's nicely isolated from everything else + I've managed to reuse all > the source/headers lists. > > Note that the series lacks a couple of patches from the downstream > repos, yet adds support for radeon, nouveau and freedreno :) > > The missing fixes are - s/mmap/mmap64/, dma-bufs support + other intel > specific "hacks". If people are happy with the series then we can take > a look at the final bits. > > > Cheers, > Emil >