Re: [PATCHv2 0/8] Upstreaming the Android build and misc fixes

[Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>]

Strange, I've explicitly made sure that it's rebased on top of libdrm/master.
I will give it another try in a moment.

FWIW, for Intel at least a mmap/mmap64 would be needed due to the bionic
shortage of their original implementation.

As mentioned earlier, I'm seeking for a few acked/reviewed-by and the rest of
the fixes will follow in due time. Can I consider this acked-by ?

Thanks for having a look
-Emil

On 31/07/14 16:33, Gore, Tim wrote:
> Ok, I still had to manually apply some of patch 3/8 as it was corrupted
> And would not apply, but after this I was able to build within one of 
> My android trees. I have not tested the resulting libraries yet, but the
> Overall build process seems ok.
> 
>   Tim
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Emil Velikov [mailto:emil.l.velikov@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2014 6:27 PM
>> To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>> Cc: Gore, Tim
>> Subject: [PATCHv2 0/8] Upstreaming the Android build and misc fixes
>>
>> Changes since the orignal posting:
>>  - Rebased on top of master.
>>  - Used _H_FILES for header lists (_HEADERS is a no-go with autotools)
>>  - Install the freedreno headers to {include_dir}/freedreno, similar to the
>> automake builds.
>>  - Correctly include $(hw)/Android.mk
>>
>> The series is also available at the fixes+android-v2 branch in
>> https://github.com/evelikov/libdrm.
>>
>> -Emil
>